Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: Reliability and error analysis

References 

1. Buck C, Dameron F, Dow MJ, Skowlund HV. Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a bubble goniometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1959;40:390–392
   • MEDLINE
2. Trott PH, Pearcy MJ, Ruston SA, Fulton I, Brien C. Three-dimensional analysis of active cervical motion: the effect of age and gender. Clin Biomech. 1996;11:201–206
3. Zylbergold RS, Piper MC. Cervical spine disorders: a comparison of three types of traction. Spine. 1985;10:867–871
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Shirley FR, O'Connor P, Robinson ME, MacMillan M. Comparison of lumbar range of motion using three measurement devices in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 1994;19:779–783
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Poussa M, Mellin G. Spinal mobility and posture in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at three stages of curve magnitude. Spine. 1992;17:757–760
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Nilsson N, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J. Lasting changes in passive range of motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996;19:165–168
   • MEDLINE
7. Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, Bracke M, Day R, Pastrick M. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:338–340
   • MEDLINE
8. Dvorak J, Antinnes J, Panjabi M, Loustalot D, Bonomo M. Age and gender related normal motion of the cervical spine. Spine. 1992;17:393–398
9. Wong A, Nansel D. Comparisons between active vs. passive endrange assessments in subjects exhibiting cervical range of motion asymmetries. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:159–163
   • MEDLINE
10. Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, Bogard CL, Hallman HO, Carey JR. Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. Phys Ther. 1992;72:770–780
    • MEDLINE
11. In: 4th ed.  Doege TC editors. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1993;
12. Mayer TG, Kondraske G, Beals SB, Gatchel RJ. Spinal range of motion: accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Spine. 1997;22:1976–1984
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Reliability of the American Medical Association guidelines' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for wholeperson impairment rating. Spine. 1999;24:262–268
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
14. Beers Y. Introduction to the theory of error. 2nd Ed. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, Inc; 1958;
15. Norman GR, McGregor M. Letter to editor. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;8:484–485
16. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales-a practical guide to their development and use. In: Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989;p. 79–105
17. Chen J, Solinger AB, Poncet JF, Lantz CA. Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine. 1999;24:1571–1578
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Lantz CA, Chen J, Buch D. Clinical validity and stability of active and passive cervical range of motion with regard to total and unilateral uniplanar motion. Spine. 1999;24:1082–1089
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
19. Solinger AB, Chen J, Lantz CA. Coupled cervical motions: correlations with primary motions, repeatabilities, and indications of sensitivity to loading shifts and patterns. In: Symposium Proceedings WFC 5th Biennial Congress; 1999 May 17–22; Auckland, New Zealand. Toronto: WFC; 1999;