Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 449-456, September 2001

Rating specific chiropractic technique procedures for common low back conditions

  • Meridel I. Gatterman, DC

      Affiliations

    • Chiropractic Physicians and Consultants Group, Portland, Ore.
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit reprint requests to: Meridel Gatterman, DC, 13735 Brazee Court, Portland, OR 97238.
  • ,
  • Robert Cooperstein, DC

      Affiliations

    • Palmer College of Chiropractic West, San Jose, Calif.
  • ,
  • Charles Lantz, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Director of Research, Life University College of Chiropractic, Marietta, Ga.
  • ,
  • Stephen M. Perle, DC

      Affiliations

    • Chiropractic Department, University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic, Bridgeport, Conn.
  • ,
  • Michael J. Schneider, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Received 5 May 2000

Abstract 

Objective: To rate specific chiropractic technique procedures used in the treatment of common low back conditions.

Design and Methods: A panel of chiropractors rated specific chiropractic technique procedures for their effectiveness in the treatment of common low back conditions, based on the quality of supporting evidence after systematic literature reviews and expert clinical opinion. Statements related to the rating process and clinical practice were then developed through a facilitated nominal consensus process.

Results: For most low back conditions presented in this study, the three procedures rated most effective were high-velocity, low- amplitude (HVLA) with no drop table (side posture), distraction technique, and HVLA prone with drop table assist. The three rated least effective were upper cervical technique, non-thrust reflex/low force, and lower extremity adjusting. The four conditions rated most amenable to chiropractic treatment were noncomplicated low back pain, sacroiliac joint dysfunction, posterior joint/subluxation, and low back pain with buttock or leg pain.

Conclusions: The ratings for the effectiveness of chiropractic technique procedures for the treatment of common low back conditions are not equal. Those procedures rated highest are supported by the highest quality of literature. Much more evidence is necessary for chiropractors to understand which procedures maximally benefit patients for which conditions.

Key Indexing Terms:: Chiropractic, Low Back Pain, Practice Guidelines, Consensus Methodology

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by a grant from the National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance Corporation, administered by the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research.

PII: S0161-4754(01)75655-2

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 449-456, September 2001