Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 457-466 , September 2001

Efficacy of spinal manipulation for chronic headache: A systematic review

  • Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research, Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, Minn.
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit reprint requests to: Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD, Department of Research, Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, North-western Health Sciences University, 2501 W. 84th St, Bloomington, MN. 55431
    • Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD, holds the Greenawalt Research Chair, funded through an unrestricted grant from Foot Levelers, Inc.
    • ,
  • Willem J.J. Assendelft, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of General Practice, Academic Medisch Centrum, The Netherlands.
    • ,
  • Roni Evans, DC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research, Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, Minn.
    • ,
  • Mitchell Haas, DC

      Affiliations

    • Center for Outcomes Studies, Western States Chiropractic College, Portland, Ore.
    • ,
  • Lex Bouter, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Vrije Universiteit, The Netherlands.

Received 15 June 2000 ,Revised 2 August 2000

References 

  1. Rasmussen BK. Epidemiology of headache. Cephalalgia. 1995;15:45–68
  2. Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Simon D, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of tension-type headache. JAMA. 1998;279:381–383
  3. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Celentano DD, Reed ML. Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. JAMA. 1992;267:64–69
  4. Business and Health Special Report: Controlling headache costs. Montvale (NJ): Medical Econo Pub; 1992;
  5. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998;280:1569–1575
  6. Haldeman S, Phillips RB. Spinal manipulative therapy in the management of low back pain. In:  Frymoyer JW,  Ducker TB,  Hadler NM,  Kostuik JP,  Weinstein JN,  Whitecloud TS editor. The adult spine: principles and practice. New York: Raven Press; 1991;p. 1581–1605
  7. Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, Meeker WC, Shekelle PG. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of literature. Spine. 1996;21:1746–1760
  8. Slavin RE. Best-evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:9–18
  9. Slavin RE. Best-evidence synthesis: an alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educ Res. 1986;15:5–11
  10. Spitzer WO, Lawrence V, Dales R, Hill G, Archer MC, Clark P, et al. Links between passive smoking and disease: a best-evidence synthesis. A report of the Working Group on Passive Smoking. Clin Invest Med. 1990;13:17–46
  11. Report of the Quebec Task Force. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Spine. 1987;12:S1–S59
  12. Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML. In: Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications; 1981;p. 10–55
  13. Cohen J. In: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988;p. 8–14
  14. Friedman H. Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its estimation. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:245–251
  15. Hedges LV, Olkin I. In: Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; 1985;p. 2–46286-306
  16. Koes BW, Assendelft WJ, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG. Spinal manipulation and mobilization for back and neck pain: a blinded review. BMJ. 1991;303:1298–1303
  17. Assendelft WJ, Koes BW, Geert JMG, van der Heijden MS, Bouter LM. The effectiveness of chiropractic for treatment of low back pain: an update and attempt at statistical pooling. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996;19:499–507
  18. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12
  19. Bigos S, Bowyer O, Braen G, Brown K, Deyo R, Haldeman S. Acute low back problems in adults. In: Clinical Practice Guideline Number 14. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994;
  20. Stude DE, Sweere JJ. A holistic approach to severe headache symptoms in a patient unresponsive to regional manual therapy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996;19:202–207
  21. Lewit K. Ligament pain and anteflexion headache. Eur Neurol. 1971;5:365–378
  22. Vernon H. Chiropractic manipulative therapy in the treatment of headaches: a retrospective and prospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1982;5:109–112
  23. Turk Z, Ratkolb O. Mobilization of the cervical spine in chronic headaches. Manual Med. 1987;3:15–17
  24. Wight JS. Migraine: a statistical analysis of chiropractic treatment. ACA J Chiro. 1978;15:28–32
  25. Droz JM, Crot F. Occipital headaches. Ann Swiss Chiro Assoc. 1985;8:127–135
  26. Mennell JM. The validation of the diagnosis “joint dysfunction” in the synovial joints of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990;13:7–12
  27. Jirout J. Comments regarding the diagnosis and treatment of dysfunctions in the C2-C3 segment. Manual Med. 1985;2:16–17
  28. Schoensee SK, Jensen G, Nicholson G, Gossman M, Katholi C. The effect of mobilization on cervical headaches. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21:184–196
  29. Mootz RD, Dhami MSI, Hess JA, Cook RD, Schorr DB. Chiropractic treatment of chronic episodic tension-type headache in male subjects: a case series analysis. J Can Chiro Assoc. 1994;38:152–159
  30. Rose P. Statistical analysis of chiropractic patients. Bull Eur Chiro J. 1978;12:21–22
  31. Whittingham W, Ellis WB, Molyneux TP. The effect of manipulation (toggle recoil technique) for headaches with upper cervical joint dysfunction: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994;17:369–375
  32. Stodolny J, Chmielewski H. Manual therapy in the treatment of patients with cervical migraine. J Manual Med. 1989;4:49–51
  33. Hoyt WH, Shaffer F, Bard DA, Benesler JS, Blankenhorn GD, Gray JH, et al. Osteopathic manipulation in the treatment of muscle-contraction headache. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1979;78:322–325
  34. Howe DH, Newcombe RG, Wade MT. Manipulation of the cervical spine—a pilot study. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983;33:574–579
  35. Bove G, Nilsson N. Spinal manipulation in the treatment of episodic tension-type headache: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998;280:1576–1579
  36. Boline PD, Kassak K, Bronfort G, Nelson C, Anderson AV. Spinal manipulation vs. amitriptyline for the treatment of chronic tension-type headaches: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:148–154
  37. Nilsson N, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J. The effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:326–330
  38. Parker GB, Tupling H, Pryor DS. A controlled trial of cervical manipulation of migraine. Aust N Z J Med. 1978;8:589–593
  39. Nelson CF, Bronfort G, Evans R, Boline P, Goldsmith C, Anderson AV. The efficacy of spinal manipulation, amitriptyline and the combination of both therapies for the prophylaxis of migraine headaches. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:511–519
  40. Jensen OK, Nielsen FF, Vosmar L. An open study comparing manual therapy with the use of cold packs in the treatment of post-traumatic headache. Cephalalgia. 1990;10:241–250
  41. Bitterli J, Graf R, Robert F, Adler R, Mumenthaler M. Zur Objektivierung der manualtherapeutischen Beeinflußßarkeit des spondylogenen Kopfschmerzes. Nervenarzt. 1977;48:259–262
  42. Parker GB, Pryor DS, Tupling H. Why does migraine improve during a clinical trial? Further results from a trial of cervical manipulation for migraine. Aust N Z J Med. 1980;10:192–198
  43. Nilsson N. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:435–440
  44. Leboeuf-Yde C, Hennius B, Rudberg B, Leufvenmark P, Thunman M. Side effects of chiropractic treatment: a prospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:511–515
  45. Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG. Complications of spinal manipulation: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Fam Pract. 1996;42:475–480
  46. Nelson CF. The tension headache, migraine headache continuum: a hypothesis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994;17:156–167
  47. Featherstone HJ. Migraine and muscle contraction headaches: a continuum. Headache. 1985;25:194–198
  48. Bogduk N. Headaches and the cervical spine. Cephalalgia. 1984;4:7–8
  49. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–S189
  50. Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95:2S–4S
  51. Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B, Silverman B, Schroeder B, Reitman D, et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clin Trials. 1981;2:31–49
  52. Moher D, Jadad A, Tugwell P. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: current issues and future directions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12:195–208
  53. Spitzer WO. Meta-meta-analysis: unanswered questions about aggregating data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:103–107
  54. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, Shachter RD. In: The statistical synthesis of evidence: meta-analysis by the confidence profile method. Orlando (FL): Academic Press; 1992;p. 35–108351-366
  55. Victor N. “The challenge of meta-analysis”: discussion. Indications and contra-indications for meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:5–8
  56. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in healthcare from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:167–171
  57. Feinstein AR. Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:71–79
  58. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA. 1990;263:1385–1389
  59. Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Ryan G, Clifton J, Buckingham L, Willan A, et al. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies. JAMA. 1993;269:2749–2753
  60. Rosenthal R. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:638–641
  61. Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H. Publication bias and clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials. 1987;8:343–353
  62. Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, Juni P, Klassen T, Le Lorier J, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet. 1996;347:363–366
  63. Gregoire G, Derderian F, Le Lorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias?. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:159–163
  64. Moher D, Jadad AR, Nichol G, Penman M, Tugwell P, Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Controlled Clin Trials. 1995;16:62–73
  65. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415
  66. Juniper EF. Quality of life questionnaires: does statistically significant = clinically important?. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;102:16–17
  67. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH, Singer J, Goldsmith CH, Hutchinson BG, Milner RA, et al. Agreement among reviewers of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:91–98
  68. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Knipschild PG. Balneotherapy and quality assessment: interobserver reliability of the Maastricht criteria list and the need for blinded quality assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:335–341
  69. Berlin JA, Miles GC, Cirigliano MD, Goldman DR, Horowitz DA. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analy-ses? Results of a randomized trial. Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1997;29:
  70. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408–412
  71. Waddell G, Feder G, McIntosh A, Hutchinson A. In: Clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1996;p. 1–35

 This study was funded by the Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, Minn.

PII: S0161-4754(01)99423-0

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 24, Issue 7 , Pages 457-466 , September 2001

Article Tools