Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 25, Issue 6 , Pages 403-415, July 2002

Guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis by densitometric methods

Centro Biomédico Indiana, Nápoles, México. E-mail: fcodiez@prodigy.net.mx

Received 30 July 2001; received in revised form 1 October 2001

Abstract 

Background: Osteoporosis is a major health hazard for postmenopausal women and elderly people. Local, national, and international organizations developed clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is the most important risk factor for fragility fractures. Bone densitometry is the best method to measure BMD in an individual. Many risk factors contribute to the development of osteoporosis and increase the fracture risk independently from BMD. Guidelines must be comprehensive, factual, simple to implement, and should provide the clinician, patients, governments, and payers with the best evidence available. Objectives: The objectives of this article were to review national and international guidelines to establish a congruent set of parameters that may aid the clinician in the decision-making process for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Data Sources: An online search of several databases provided 18 guidelines for this review. Comparison among the guidelines was made on 10 different aspects: format, focus, significance of hip and vertebral body fractures, primary diagnostic considerations, BMD measurement technology, interpretation, reporting and follow-up, equipment reliability and quality control, risk factors considered, and methodologic quality of the guidelines. Tables were created for easier comparison on the aspects covered and supported by each guideline. Results: None of the guidelines reviewed fulfills all the requirements of good clinical practice guidelines. Conclusions: Further works should finally provide all those interested with a more complete and thorough set of guidelines based on the best evidence available. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:403-15)

Keywords:  Osteoporosis, Risk Factors, Fractures, Bone Densitometry, Guidelines

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Submit reprint requests to: Dr. Francisco Díez, Centro Biomédico Indiana, Indiana #188, Col. A. Nápoles, México, Mexico, D.F. 03818

PII: S0161-4754(02)00017-9

doi:10.1067/mmt.2001.126126

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 25, Issue 6 , Pages 403-415, July 2002