Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 25, Issue 8 , Pages 504-510, October 2002

Internal forces sustained by the vertebral artery during spinal manipulative therapy

  • Bruce P. Symons, DC
  • ,
  • Tim Leonard
  • ,
  • Walter Herzog, PhDc

      Affiliations

    • aPhD student, Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Canada.b Research Technologist, Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Canada.c Professor and Associate Dean of Research, Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Canada.

Abstract 

Background: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has been established as a clinically effective modality for the management of several musculoskeletal disorders. One major issue with the use of SMT is its safety, especially with respect to neck manipulation and the risk of stroke in the vertebrobasilar system. Objectives: Our objectives were to quantify the strains and forces sustained by the vertebral artery (VA) in situ during SMT. Study Design: This was a cadaveric study. Methods: Six VAs were obtained from 5 unembalmed postrigor cadavers. The cephalad/distal (C0-C1) and caudad/proximal (C6-subclavian artery) loops of the VA were carefully exposed and instrumented with a pair of piezoelectric ultrasonographic crystals. The strains between each crystal pair were recorded during range of motion testing and diagnostic tests and during a variety of SMT procedures. The VA was then dissected free and strained on a materials testing machine until mechanical failure occurred. Results: SMT performed on the contralateral side of the cervical spine resulted in an average strain of 6.2% ± 1.3% to the distal (C0-C1) loop of the VA and a 2.1% ± 0.4% strain to the proximal (C6) loop. These values were similar to or lower than the strains recorded during diagnostic and range of motion testing. Failure testing demonstrated that the VAs could be stretched to 139% to 162% of their resting length before mechanical failure occurred. Therefore the strains sustained by the VA during SMT represent approximately one ninth of the strain at mechanical failure. Conclusions: SMT resulted in strains to the VA that were almost an order of magnitude lower than the strains required to mechanically disrupt it. We conclude that under normal circumstances, a single typical (high-velocity/low-amplitude) SMT thrust is very unlikely to mechanically disrupt the VA. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:504-10)

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by grants from the Canadian Chiropractic Association and the Chiropractic Foundation for Spinal Research.

PII: S0161-4754(02)00048-9

doi:10.1067/mmt.2002.127076

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 25, Issue 8 , Pages 504-510, October 2002