Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 25, Issue 6 , Pages 423-425 , July 2002

References 

  1. Cates JR, Young DN, Gurriero DJ, Jahn WT, Armine JP, Korbett AB, et al.  Evaluating the quality of clinical practice guidelines. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:170
  2. Rome P. Usages of chiropractic terminology in the literature: 296 ways to say “subluxation”: complex issues for the vertebral subluxation. Chiropr Tech. 1996;8:49
  3. Keating JC. A critical look at the subluxation hypothesis [letter]. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990;13:350
  4. World Health Organization . The first ten years of the World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO; 1958;
  5. Blanks RHI, Schuster TL, Dobson M. A retrospective assessment of Network care using a survey of self-reported health, wellness and quality of life. J Vertebral Subluxation Res. 1997;1:15
  6. Coulter ID, Hurwitz EL, Aronow HU, et al.  Chiropractic patients in a comprehensive home-based geriatric assessment, follow-up and health promotion program. Topics Clin Chiropr. 1996;3:46
  7. Rupert RL, Manello D, Sandefur R. Maintenance care: health promotion services administered to US chiropractic patients aged 65 or older, part II. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:10
  8. Rupert RL. A survey of practice patterns and the health promotion and prevention attitudes of US chiropractors. Maintenance care: part I. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:1
  9. Miller S. Survey says?. Chiroviewpresents.comFebruary 6 2002; Available at Accessed
  10. Smith R. Where is the wisdom? The poverty of medical evidence [editorial]. Brit Med J. 1991;303:798
  11. Huxley A. Point counter-point. Quoted in Smith RF: Prelude to Science In: New York: Scribners; 1975;p. 8

PII: S0161-4754(02)70018-3

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 25, Issue 6 , Pages 423-425 , July 2002