« Previous
Next »
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 27, Issue 3
, Pages 186-196
, March 2004
Effect of a Back Belt on Reaching Postures
References
-
.
Perspective on lifting belts for material handling.
In:
Karwowski W, Salvendy G editor. Ergonomics in manufacturing. Norcross (GA): Engineering and Management Press; 1998;
-
.
Should industrial workers wear abdominal belts? Prescription based on the recent literature.
Int J Ind Ergon. 1999;23:633–636
-
.
Update on the use of back belts in industry: more data—same conclusions.
In:
Karwowski W, Marras W editor. Occupational Ergonomics Handbook. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1999;p. 1353–1658
- . Effect of belt pressure and breath held on trunk electromyography. Spine. 2002;27:282–290
- . Lumbar vertebral angles and back muscle loading with belts. Ind Health. 1999;37:390–397
- . Lumbar spine stability can be augmented with an abdominal belt and/or increased intra-abdominal pressure. Eur Spine J. 1999;8:388–395
- . Does a back support have a positive biomechanical effect?. Appl Ergon. 1996;27:201–205
- . The effectiveness of weight-belts during multiple repetitions of the squat exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24:603–609
-
.
Effects of abdominal belts on intra-abdominal pressure, intramuscular pressure in the erector spinae muscles and myoelectrical activities of trunk muscles.
Clin Biomech. 1999;14:79–87
- . The effect of an abdominal belt on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure during squat lifts. Ergonomics. 1990;33:147–160
- . EMG recordings of abdominal and back muscles in various standing postures: validation of a biomechanical model on sacroiliac joint stability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8:205–214
- . Effects of a lifting belt on spine moments and muscle recruitments after unexpected sudden loading. Spine. 2000;25:1569–1578
- . Passive stiffness of the lumbar torso in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Effect of belt wearing and breath holding. Spine. 1994;19:696–704
- . The effect of lumbar belts on isolated lumbar muscle. Strength and dynamic capacity. Spine. 1995;20:68–73
- . The effect of lumbar support belts on isometric force production during a simulated lift. J Occup Rehabil. 1995;5:131–143
- . The effect of back belts on lumbar muscle fatigue. Spine. 1995;20:1271–1278
- . The effect of wearing a back belt on spine kinematics during asymmetric lifting of large and small boxes. Spine. 2001;26:1794–1798
- . The effect of industrial back belts and breathing technique on trunk and pelvic coordination during a lifting task. Spine. 1999;24:1124–1130
- . The effect of lifting belt use on multijoint motion and load bearing during repetitive and asymmetric lifting. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:57–64
- . Physiological effects of back belt wearing during asymmetric lifting. Appl Ergon. 2001;32:541–547
- . Wearing an abdominal belt increases diastolic blood pressure. J Occup Environ Med. 1996;38:925–927
-
.
Effects of industrial back supports on physiological demand, lifting style and perceived exertion.
Int J Ind Ergon. 1996;17:445–453
-
.
The role of lifting belts in manual lifting.
Int J Ind Ergon. 1988;2:259–266
- . The effect of a back belt on torso motion—survey in an express package delivery company. Ind Health. 1997;35:235–242
- The effect of back belt use on isometric lifting force and fatigue of the lumbar paraspinal muscles. Spine. 1998;23:2104–2109
- . Trunk muscle use during pulling tasks: effects of a lifting belt and footing conditions. Hum Factors. 1998;40:159–172
-
.
Belt effects on lumbar sagittal angles.
Clin Biomech. 2000;15:79–82
- . A prospective study of back belts for prevention of back pain and injury. JAMA. 2000;284:2727–2732
-
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Workplace use of back belts. Cincinnati (OH): NIOSH; 1994. DHHS (NIOSH) No. 94-122.
-
Acute low back problems in adults. Clinical practice guideline no. 14. Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994;
AHCPR Publication No. 95-0642
- . Mechanisms of action of lumbar supports. Spine. 2000;25:2103–2113
- . Postural dynamics: clinical and empirical implications. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:340–349
-
.
In: Energetics of human activity. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2000;p. 6
- . Energy cost and stride duration variability at preferred transition gait speed between walking and running. Can J Appl Physiol. 1996;21:471–480
-
.
Postural adaptation for altered environments, tasks and intentions.
In:
Winters JM, Crago PE editor. Biomechanics and neural control of posture and movement. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2000;p. 267–281
- . Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses. Nature. 1981;292:239–240
- . Mechanical and muscular factors affecting the efficiency of human movement. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17:326–331
-
Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997;25:1365–1379
- . Theories of musculoskeletal injury causation. Ergonomics. 2001;44:17–47
-
.
Two problems in the calibration of critical action boundaries. Paper presented at: 11th International Conference on Perception and Action; 2001. Storrs Connecticut: University of Connecticut, June 25–29; 2001;
-
.
The coordination dynamics of learning: theoretical structure and experimental agenda.
In:
Swinnen S, Heuer H, Massion J, Casaer P, et al. editor. Interlimb coordination—neural, dynamical, and cognitive constraints. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994;p. 461–490
-
.
How do task characteristics affect the transitions between seated and standing reaches?.
Ecological Psychol. 2001;13:245–274
-
SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6. 4th ed. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc; 1990. p. 891–996
-
.
Mechanics of the intervertebral disc.
In:
Ghosh P editors. The biology of the intervertebral disc. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 1988;p. 39–71
- . Occupational low back disorder causation and control. Ergonomics. 2000;43:880–902
- . Working with low back pain: workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40:627–638
-
.
Predictors of occupational low back disability: implications for secondary prevention.
J Occup Eviron Med. 1999;41:1024–1031
☆ This study was partially funded by a grant from Back-A-Line. D. Smith has received fellowship support from the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (FCER).
PII: S0161-4754(03)00250-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.12.028
© 2004 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 27, Issue 3
, Pages 186-196
, March 2004
