Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 375-380, July 2004

Electromyographic Responses of Paraspinal Muscles to Postural Disturbance with Special Reference to Scoliotic Children

  • Claude Perret, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Laboratory of Psychophysiology (UFR7), University Paris 8, and Institut Franco-Europe de Chiropractique, France
  • Jean Robert, DC

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationJean Robert, DC, 2 Micheli-du-Crest, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
    • Director, Swiss Institute of Chiropractic, Bern, Switzerland

Received 26 February 2001; received in revised form 29 March 2001; accepted 19 March 2003.

Abstract 

Background

Electromyographic (EMG) responses of erector spinae to a postural perturbation have been described and interpreted as an unloading reflex. Moreover, these responses have been found clearly and constantly abnormal in subjects presenting a progressive idiopathic scoliosis when compared with responses observed in subjects presenting a nonprogressive scoliosis or in normal subjects.

Objective

To investigate responses to obtain more precise information on their components, on their origin, and on their variations in scoliotic children.

Subjects

Thirteen scoliotic children, with 3 cases of fast progressive idiopathic scoliosis, as well as 3 healthy subjects.

Setting

The study was carried out at the Swiss Institute of Chiropractic in Bern Switzerland.

Methods

The subjects were standing on a specially constructed platform that could be suddenly tilted either to the right or to the left. Thoracic and lumbar paraspinal muscle activity was recorded with pairs of self-adhesive surface bipolar EMG electrodes. The responses were analyzed to detect components and study their time course and relative amplitude in successive trials; characteristics common to different subjects were looked for.

Results

The presence of short-latency responses and later activities following a postural perturbation was confirmed. In a given subject, these components vary in amplitude and time course from one trial to another. On the other hand, the differences found across subjects are not significantly different from those found within the various subjects.

Conclusion

Our results exhibit some differences with previous data. They lead to a different neurophysiological interpretation and they indicate that the stimulus and the responses need more precise analysis before being used as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in evolutive scoliosis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by a grant from the European Chiropractors' Union (ECURF).

PII: S0161-4754(04)00096-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.05.001

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 27, Issue 6 , Pages 375-380, July 2004