| | The Neuroarticular Lesion in the Elderly: A Condensed Literature ReviewReceived 21 August 2002; received in revised form 1 October 2002; accepted 29 October 2002. Abstract ObjectiveThis condensed literature review was performed to show how inappreciably known are the aging effects of the neuromuscular system, especially the neuroarticular function. To give a needed perspective on the aging process of the musculoskeletal system of a rapidly aging population that is all-important to the chiropractor. Data SourcesAn online search of several databases (MEDLINE and MANTIS) provided several guidelines for review. Comparison among the guidelines was made on different aspects: format, focus, significance of aging of the neuroarticular process, and primary diagnostic considerations. For brevity, no tables were cited for comparisons on the aspects covered and supported by the references. Data SynthesisCondensed literature review from abstracts and full-length articles were used to establish the review conclusions. ResultsThe data and information found in this literature search are insufficient to draw primary conclusions about the aging process and the neuroarticular complex. ConclusionIt may be simply concluded that there needs to be additional concentrated research in the area of the neuroarticular process and the lesion that occurs at some point in time to a significant majority of individuals. As a large portion of chiropractic patients are elderly, this perspective should be read by all chiropractors. There were several criteria in mind when the project began, especially to improve the chiropractic care of the aged patient, to review and to develop needed data, and to understand the neuroarticular process involvement. This article was to accomplish the understanding and build interest in the degeneration ramifications in the neuroarticular complex of the elderly. This interest may stimulate more attention on the subject with an extensive literature search of the topic and additional research needed. Introduction  There are many theories about the aging process, but as yet, none fully explain the underlying mechanism and mystery of how and why we age. By 2050, it is estimated that 30% of the world's population will be 65 years or older.1 Along with this knowledge comes the realization that age-related neurodegenerative disorders will become more prevalent, yet not nearly as common as musculoskeletal disorders. Musculoskeletal impairments are among the most endemic and symptomatic health problems of middle and old age.2, 3, 4 The clinician is often presented with a fine line between the diagnosis of a subclinical disease process and normal aging effects. The combination of muscular weakness and central nervous system (CNS) degenerative change increases the susceptibility for injury. For some elderly people, a severe decline of their mobility results in institutionalization and a loss of independence. Retaining independence is important in light of our rapidly aging population. Data from the United States Bureau of Census has indicated that between 1990 and 2010, the number of people 45 years of age or older will likely increase by more than 40 million from approximately 82 million to 124 million. The neuroarticular complex5 has multiple interrelated tissue components, each of which may undergo changes associated with the aging process, producing different tissue characteristics in normal or pathologic states. A variety of theories have been postulated to explain the characteristic effects and process of aging. One theory, the “wear-and-tear” theory,6 maintains that the human body simply wears out with use as any complex piece of machinery does. Another theory, the “waste-product” theory,6 proposes that damaging waste products build up on a cellular level and interfere with metabolic functioning. A third theory, the “autoimmune” theory,6 holds that the body's immune system, which is normally directed to defend against foreign substances, begins to attack the body's own cells; the body ages because it can no longer distinguish between its own cells and foreign invaders. According to yet another view, the “free radical” theory, highly reactive chemical fragments of metabolism in the body called free radicals may cause aging by destroying other essential body chemicals and cells.7, 8 The underlying pathology inducing free radical production may be ischemia. Aging may be an entirely intrinsic process, according to the programmed cellular senescence theory, ie, there may be a genetic reproduction program which is spelled out at conception in the DNA within the fertilized egg, and cellular division eventually runs out of replacement cells so that body functions simply end. Normal differentiated cells have a limited capacity for division, referred to as “programmed cellular senescence.”9 This senescent program can be accelerated by combined system degeneration. It has been demonstrated that undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells can proliferate quickly and can differentiate and produce a new tissue matrix rapidly. When undifferentiated mesenchymal cells divide, some of these cells become the precursors for differentiated cells, which include fibroblasts, osteoblasts, myoblasts, and chondrocytes. It was postulated that similar changes often occur in other articular and periarticular tissues. A loss of the mesenchymal stem cell population within the cartilaginous and subchondral articular matrix allows for incomplete repair and additional increased risk for pathologic loading sequelae. It has been suggested by Hayflick10 that cells possess a biologic clock that dictates their life span. Hayflick10 found that normal human fibroblasts grown in culture divide regularly until they cover the entire surface of the culture flask. Normal cultured human fibroblasts can double only a limited number of times (about 50) over a period of 7 to 9 months. Starting at around the 35th passage, their rate of division begins to slow down; eventually, they stop dividing and die. Fibroblasts from older human donors double significantly fewer times than those obtained from young human embryos. The number of cell doublings is roughly related to the age of the donor cells. This indicates that the number of passages is roughly related to the longevity of the species. Thus, in the fibroblast, the longevity-limiting biologic clock seems to be located in the nucleus. These and other studies indicate that at least some aspects of aging are intrinsic and/or genetic. Whether the programmed senescence of the fibroblast can be applied to the various tissues of the joint motion segment remains to be seen. A slightly different view of aging as a natural consequence is the notion that the body may have specific genetic control centers in the brain that control the aging process. Although each of the above theories is different, each may introduce us, to some extent, to the overall aging process. Discussion  Most physical changes relating to aging are not visible to the naked eye; they occur at the cytoarchitectural and metabolic levels of the body. In this online literature search, I have found it difficult to get the needed data relevant to the aging neuroarticular complex. I did, however, find abundant engaging data pertinent to the subject. While analyzing the data by format, focus, significance, and some of the diagnostic considerations, I was able to draw some limited conclusions from this information, which I would like to discuss. The Aging of the Neuroreceptor Population The aging of the neuroreceptor population is seen in the neurarticular complex and related modulating centers associated with reflex and motor control, wherein various neurochemical changes have been observed in the nervous tissue of both aged animals and humans.11 Among the changes noted are alterations in neurotransmitters, their metabolites, and the enzymes involved in their synthesis and degradation. Najlerahim et al11 indicated there was age-related alteration in excitatory amino acid neurotransmission in their animal studies. The hippocampus and cerebellum failed to show significant age-related changes in uptake of D-[3H]aspartate. Uptake of D-[3H]aspartate decreased significantly in the neurocortex (20%), striate nuclei (29%), nucleus basalis (26%), amygdala (19°/a), and thalamus (16%) in the middle-aged rats as compared with young rats, but the changes were not progressive with age. The release of glutamate from the nucleus basalis was unaltered during the aging process. Donzanti and Ung12 report that alterations in neurotransmitter amino acid content in the aging rat striatum are subregionally dependent. These findings demonstrate specific striatal subregional changes in neurotransmitter amino acid content as a function of aging. In a study by Albert13 on aging epidemiology, it was found that, even among successfully aging, healthy individuals, there is wide variability in structural and functional decline. Test results show, rather conclusively, that there is progressive deterioration in cognitive ability with age related to specific changes in the brain. This suggests, contrary to what we all were taught, that this is probably not the result of substantial neuronal loss in the cortex. It is more related to specific nuclei where there are changes in neuron numbers with age, such as the basal forebrain, and in changes in synaptic organization, in conductivity, and in neurotransmitter levels that are reflected by these morphologic measurements.13 Humans and other primates show a significant loss in brain weight and an increase in DNA with senescence. By age 80, total brain protein is reduced by 10% to 30%. Concomitantly, there is a progressive increase in total DNA, presumably caused by proliferation of glial cells (gloss), and only a slight increase in water content. Lipid constituents (neural fats, cerebrosides, and phosphatides) decrease minimally with age.14 Age-related alterations in the synthesis and degradation of neurotransmitters and their receptors could explain some of the characteristics of senescence; blood flow to the brain is reduced by 20% in the elderly, which may contribute to the previously mentioned physiologic changes and the following changes in the 70+-year-old group: altered mood, appetite, sleep pattern, neuroendocrine functions, motor activity, and memory. Chronology of Loss of the Neuroreceptive Field in the Elderly Encapsulated receptors, such as Pacini's and Meissner's corpuscles, display age-related changes involving both the capsule as well as the structure of their nerve terminals.15 In a study by Bolton et al,16 it was noted that there was an apparent loss of Meissner's corpuscles from the fingers and toes in the aged population studied. This contributed to significantly less perception to mechanical stimulation on the palms and thumbs in elderly subjects (aged 60 to 70 years) as compared with young individuals (aged 20 to 36 years). In another study by Swash and Fox,17 it was reported that the muscle spindle capsule thickens and there are subsequently fewer intrafusal muscle fibers noted in the elderly. This has significant ramifications relative to the modulation of the gamma intrafusal system and subsequent muscle tonus and the modulation of the central state of the alpha motor neuronal pool. There is a progressive impairment of touch-pressure perception, which approaches a fourfold reduction in males over age 40.18 Postural changes in the elderly have been ascribed to a loss of proprioceptive receptors from ligaments and muscles, leaving primarily visual cues as to the vertical position of the head and neck in space. Regardless of reference to age, it is certain that there is loss of the neuroreceptive field in the elderly and aged population and that this loss may begin as early as age 50. This age-dependant loss of receptors reduces the ability of the human nervous system to coordinate and interpret the interactions of the individual with his or her environment. The sensory receptors of the nervous system provide a link with the outside world. Neurosensory changes that influence functioning, activities, response to stimuli, and perception of the world do occur with age, and this deficit significantly reduces the protective neuromuscular reflexes of the aged individual. At the present time, research studies of the articular complex have been conducted primarily postmortem, with the average age of specimens being 60 to 65 years.19 It follows, then, that more should be known about the damaged and diseased motor systems than the normal one. It is precisely because so little is known of normal functional anatomy that problems arise interpreting the data and results of studies of “aging” versus “degeneration.” Kirkaldy-Willis20 suggests there is considerable evidence to support the point of view that aging and degenerative changes are not synonymous and that degenerative changes do not appear unless the joint has been damaged by trauma of some type. For the most part, joints in healthy active elderly individuals prove to be just as strong in torsion or compression as younger ones.21 Further, degenerated joints appear to be stiffer than normal but fail before healthier ones.22 Pineda et al23 have attempted to develop a histological grading of articular age. These recent studies have demonstrated the development with aging of advanced glycosylated end products (ie, degenerative cross-linked end products of nonenzymatic glycosylation), involving a variety of intracellular and extracellular proteins. Proposed pathogenic mechanisms involving diffuse forms of injury, such as microvascular injury resulting in ganglionic ischemia, would be less favored, because the damage is apparently preferential to selected subpopulations of nerve terminals while sparing others. Both experimental animals and human subjects develop ultrastructural features of neuroaxonal dystrophy involving presynaptic nerve terminals in prevertebral, but not paravertebral, sympathetic ganglia as a function of age.24, 25 Aging in the neuroreceptor population is evidenced by a reduction of about 80% in the number of Meissner's corpuscles between birth and old age; the number of nerves supplying each corpuscle is also reduced; and the nerve endings are confined to the deep end of the core. Interestingly, while the number of Meissner's corpuscles is greatly reduced as one ages, there is also evidence that the Pacincian receptors increase in cell volume as one ages. The Intervertebral Disk No musculoskeletal tissue undergoes more dramatic age-related changes than the intervertebral disk.26 These changes have become even more evident with the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. One of the most common complaints from the elderly person is the reporting of localizing stiffness and discomfort in the back region. This may, in part, be attributed to the aging characteristics of the intervertebral disk. The increase of collagen cross-links through nonenzymatic glycosylation (glycation) or mechanisms of lipid peroxidation in the intervertebral disk, more importantly, may alter their mechanical properties and contribute to tissue degeneration.27 Age-related defective diffusion mechanism at the vertebral end plate-annular interface provides a basis for the loss of structural integrity of the disk.28 With advancing age, permeability of the end plates decreases.29 The majority of these changes occur within the nucleus pulposus and the transitional region between the nucleus and inner annular fibers near the center of the disk. The collagen of the intervertebral disk not only increases in quantity but also changes in nature. The fibril diameter of collagen in the nucleus pulposus increases, such that the type II collagen of the nucleus starts to resemble the type I collagen of the annulus fibrosus.30 With age, the ratio of keratin sulfate to chondroitin sulfate in the nucleus increases to well above the level found in the annulus.31 Declining nutrition to the chondrocyte population is a critical variable responsible for changes in the cells in the center of the disk and in their matrices.32 Morphologic studies have shown that cell types and the number of viable cells change dramatically with age in the central regions of the disk.33 The fraction of hexosamine in the total dry weight of disk tissue decreases with age, while the collagen content increases in the nucleus.34, 35, 36 Aging chondrocytes change their patterns of synthesis to produce different, more variable matrix proteoglycans.20 Cracking and fissuring of the annular fibers of the intervertebral disk has been demonstrated in young adults. This is accompanied by a loss of the intradiskal water content, as well as a decrease in proteoglycan density. The water content drops from over 85% in preadolescence to about 70% to 75% in middle age.37 This subsequently results in intervertebral disk desiccation and a loss of structural dimensions to include diminished vertical height. This increases the risk for abnormal facet cartilaginous loading. One of the most critical factors in the early decline of the nuclear fiber matrices appears to be that of a progressive malnutrition state near the center of the disk. The cells within the center of the disk matrix are dependent on the passive diffusion of nutrients through the subchondral end plate and from the blood supply at the periphery of the annular fibers. Disorders which may contribute to altered periannular and subchondral blood flow typically seen in the elderly person include vascular disease, chronic smoking, diabetes, and cardiac disease. Between the second and the seventh decades, the anteroposterior diameter of the lumbar disk increases by about 10% in women and 2% in men, and there is about a 10% decrease in the height of most disks. As well, the upper and lower surfaces of the disk increase in convexity, a change which occurs at the expense of the shape of the vertebral bodies.37 Older lumbar spines show a greater amount of creep and hysteresis, with a greater “set” after creep deformation and a decreased range of motion.38 The greater hysteresis seen in older spines is probably due to the decreased water-binding capacity of the intervertebral disk. Less able to attract water, these disks take longer to resume their original configuration and structure after deformation.39 Vertebral End Plate In the subchondral bone of the end plate, vascular channels are gradually occluded, resulting in a decrease in the permeability of the end plate region for nutrients to the disk. Between the ages of 20 and 65, the end plate becomes thinner.40 Moreover, the central portion of the vertebral end plate is rendered more liable to fracture in the presence of excessive compressive loads applied to the disk. Microfractures can be found in the end plates and vertical trabecula of vertebral bodies in greater frequency relative to increasing age.26, 41 Lacking support from the underlying bone, the vertebral end plates deform by microfracture and gradually bow into the vertebral body, imparting a concave shape to the superior and inferior surfaces of the vertebral body.42 With age, the strength of the vertebral end plate decreases and becomes susceptible to compressive loading.43 The vertebral end plates are more likely than the annulus to fail under compression because the tensile strength of the annulus is greater than that of the vertebrae.44 The Zygapophyseal Joints During the third decade of life, there is a significant increase in hydration of facet cartilage, which increases more during the fourth decade and remains high throughout adulthood.45 This overall increase in hydration is attributed to the frequent presence of severe fibrillation on the facet joint cartilage after the age of 30 years.45 The articular cartilage and subchondral bone of the anterior, coronal third of the zygapophyseal joint shows changes that are likely to be related to loading of this part of the joint in flexion. The sagittally oriented two thirds of the lumbar joints show age changes which reflect shearing type forces imparted to the articular cartilage through the fibrous capsule.46 Some fibers of the multifidus muscle insert into the fibrous capsule of the zygapophyesal joint. Multifidus atrophy or other pathology will result in abnormal loading characteristics of the facet cartilage surface and contribute to degeneration. Just as abnormal joint stresses produce a characteristic degenerative pathology, lack of joint stress or immobility produces accelerated joint deterioration.47 The effects of stress deprivation on synovial joints are profound, frequently producing intra-articular changes through pannus formation, which nearly obliterate the joint space. If the process is allowed to continue for months, cartilage necrosis is seen in contact areas and erosion/ulceration occur in noncontact areas.45 Intercellular collagen fiber bundles may be decreased in thickness and number secondary to immobilization, ie, atrophy of collagen. Increased joint stiffness after immobilization has been well known clinically and scientifically for decades.47 An overloaded facet joint with a rostrocaudal force will produce a stretching of the joint capsule. Age-related disk space narrowing often results in “settling” or “erosion” of the facet joints.48 Joint Capsules/Ligaments Similar to Wolffs49 Law for bones, a generalized statement on the adaptation of applied stress and motion for tendons and ligaments can also be made. Roux50 recognized this “law of functional adaptation” by stating that an organ will adapt itself structurally to an alteration, quantitative or qualitative of function. Therefore, it is not surprising that ligaments are morphologically, biomechanically, and biochemically sensitive to both stress enhancement and stress deprivation.50 In a like manner, age changes (which may be primarily disuse) and repetitive minor trauma bring about substantial loss of resiliency in the joint capsule and ligaments; increasing age also causes ligament “stiffening” as the number of cross-linkages between adjacent collagen fibrils increase substantially, making the fibers less compliant.51 The articular capsule contains mainly fibrocytes or fibroblasts with little ground substance. The aging process leads to diminished articular blood supply51; this relatively poor blood supply yields a slower healing response when zygapophyseal joint capsule damage occurs.52 The tensile properties of some ligamentous-osseous complexes deteriorate markedly with age. Aging is the principal cause of structural changes in ligaments, such as fraying, partial ruptures, necrosis, and cyst formation.53 Specifically, the tensile properties of the ligaments become reduced.54, 55 The subsynovial layer of the articular synovial membrane can be of an areolar, areolar-adipose, fibrous, or fibroareolar matrix. The subsynovial layer is highly vascular and has a plentiful supply of elastin, which imparts a function of elastic recoil during joint movement.56 Loss of Joint Mobility, Denervation, and Atrophy Despite the close involvement and relationship between aging, degeneration, and deconditioning, it should be clear that they are not one and the same, although they are inextricably connected. Many anatomic and physiologic experts point out this fact in the previously mentioned research. What is evident is the need for movement and motion even from the cellular level throughout the entire organism. Often the physician is preoccupied with the patient's condition and tends to forget the beginning alteration of structure. With regard to joint and ligament flexibility, the subclinical period of preaffliction is the time when prevention or early intervention is quite effective. When motion is lost, regardless of causation, (ie, degeneration, trauma, inflammation, etc.) movement and biomechanics become of paramount importance to the doctor and patient. The effect of exercise on age-related muscle atrophy is well documented.6, 57, 58, 59 The active individual can slow the aging processes and often reduce pain-related syndromes.20, 60 The deconditioned, inactive individual will find that the distinction between deconditioning, degeneration, and aging becomes, at times, difficult. By decreasing strength, restricting movement, and causing pain, musculoskeletal impairments prevent people who are middle-aged and older from making full use of their abilities; this limits opportunities for work and impedes the recreational physical activity necessary to maintain optimum mobility for good health. Recognizing this deconditioned state and encouraging an increased activity level will postpone the onset of a multitude of progressive degenerative conditions in the elderly. Muscle and Motor Unit The muscular motor unit undergoes a significant degree of involutional change in the aging population. Myopathic and neuropathic changes can be found in aged muscle.60, 61 The motor unit is the basic functional element of contractile tissue and comprises an alpha-motor neuron, its nerve fiber, and the subserving muscle fibers that it innervates. It has been suggested that there may be trophic interdependence between the alpha motor neuron and its subserving muscle fibers. It is important to keep this in mind when evaluating the motor unit as an aging functional system. The number of motor units decreases with increasing age, especially after mid life.62 The decline in strength in old age reflects decreased numbers of muscle fibers within the motor units.18 There are modest decreases in high-energy metabolites (adenosine diphosphate, adenosine triphosphate, and phosphocreatine) in muscles of the aged.4 Older muscles have an increased susceptibility to contraction-induced mechanical injuries and a decreased ability to regenerate injured tissue. Muscle fiber atrophy, particularly of type II fibers, is a well-documented concomitant of aging; these fibers are fast twitch and anaerobic in metabolic activity.63 It has been suggested that this reflects the changing proportion of a higher percentage of type I to type II fibers in old age.64 Disorganization of myofibrillar architecture, with Z-band “streaming,” may be seen in aging muscle.65 Electromyography of normal elderly persons occasionally shows denervation and reinnervation changes in muscles not subject to entrapment or trauma. These findings are generally attributed to age-related neuronal fallout or subclinical ventral root compression by arthritic vertebrae.66 It is a reasonable hypothesis that maintenance of motor unit populations is a prerequisite for avoiding some of the hazards confronting the elderly, such as bronchopneumonia due to poor lung inflation and accidents due to loss of mobility and disuse. Even though motor units are lost with age, the increased sizes of the compound action potentials of the surviving units indicate that a proportion of the elderly motoneurons are able to establish collateral reinnervation and to diminish the loss of strength that would otherwise occur. The distal muscles (thenar and extensor digitorum brevis) show losses of motor units with increasing age when investigated by manual estimating techniques.62 The respective declines become statistically significant in the 60- to 79-year-old subjects and are still more marked in the oldest individuals (80 to 98 years). In contrast, the number of motor units appears to be well maintained in the biceps brachii muscle, even in the oldest age group.67 In review, the muscle fibers within a motor unit are of the same type because of the axonal modulated trophic and firing characteristics. Muscle fibers become flaccid and their bulk is reduced secondary to nerve injury with denervation. One of the more obvious, common changes in the motor unit accompanying aging is reduction in bulk. The muscle contours become blunted and rounded, and the total mass decreases from 43% to 25% in senescence.68 Carefully performed studies of both humans and animals show a progressive reduction in muscle fiber size with aging.63 Motor Nerve and Ventral Root Segmental demyelination and remyelination in the aged (dog) is particularly evident within the ventral roots.69 Human ventral roots display myelin changes, nerve fiber loss, and an increase in connective tissue with advanced age. Lumbosacral roots are estimated to lose 350 fibers per decade as a consequence of anterior horn cell loss.70 Although there is considerable variation within each decade, axonal counts show a significant decrease in both anterior and posterior roots beginning after age 30; by age 89, a 32% reduction in anterior root axons is observed.71 The ability of motoneurons to sprout and reinnervate denervated muscle is impaired in the aged.72 Experimental studies indicate that a decline in strength in old age reflects both fiber atrophy and a decreased number of muscle fibers.73 Some of the studies on the aging effects on sensory ganglion cells have been contradictory. Some investigators have reported a decrease in the number of cells with age, whereas others have reported no significant depletion. Gardner74 concluded that there is a progressive deposition of lipofuscin within the sensory ganglion cells in the aging population. The Autonomic Nervous System During the aging process, a marked loss of cells occurs in the monoaminergic neuronal systems. This is the region responsible for the regulation of autonomic (vagus, locus coeruleus) and extrapyramidal (substantia nigra) functions.75 The number of sympathetic neuronal cell bodies in the intermediolateral column of the spinal cord diminishes with age.76 A striking depletion of cell bodies has also been reported within the human cervical sympathetic ganglion, although to a lesser degree than other peripheral ganglia such as within the paravertebral ganglia.76 The Speed of Central Processing Slowing occurs in such simple motor tasks as running and rate of finger tapping, in sensory perceptions as monitored by latency of sensory evoked response, and in reaction time and more complex tasks requiring central processing.77 The effects of aging are reported to be more marked in complex reaction time tasks, in which the subjects choose between 2 or more alternatives.78 Central decision time is also increased in older subjects asked to mentally rotate geometric figures to determine if they are congruent. Larson et al79 studied the patellar reflex time of healthy males with white-collar jobs aged 25 to 65. He observed a prolongation of the total reflex time, but this was due almost entirely to a delay in the motor time component. The reflex latency, representing the neuronal component, was unchanged.79 Numerous examples have been reported indicating that the more complex the task, the greater the age effect on performance of the task. Birren80 in his studies suggested that these changes reflect a general central nervous system mediated process that impacts across a wide range of behaviors. Exacerbation in the Deconditioned Patient From the foregoing, it is obvious that many factors can cause disturbances in musculoskeletal function. Similarly, degenerative changes associated with the aging neuroarticular complex can lead to loss of compensatory ability and, at times, to disability. This may result from mechanical factors, such as hypertrophic spurs, or developmental anomalies that cause functional spinal problems. Occupational factors, such as repetitive microtrauma on the job or sitting in an incorrect posture at a computer 8 hours a day for years, can also initiate musculoskeletal dysfunction.50 Sudden stress or athletic trauma can also have long-lasting musculoskeletal consequences that manifest as incapacitating symptoms. These considerations lead us to believe that the deconditioned individual is at higher risk of developing degenerative changes within the neurologic complex. Even when aging is apparent, it does not necessarily signal the presence of degenerative neurologic function caused by pathophysiologic causes. Certainly, there are numerous studies to indicate a slowing down of physiologic vigor and function as an aging process; yet, aging is not synonymous with degeneration and dysfunction per se. It is evident from the studies of Lieberman et al81 that substantial differences in the absolute levels and patterns of daily rest and activity were observed across age groups. Overall, the elderly subjects were somewhat more active at times than the young subjects, especially in the early morning. Consistent with their increased levels of daytime activity, the elderly subjects reported less sleepiness and fatigue. These findings suggest that levels and rhythms of daily activity in healthy elderly people are often well preserved and may not deteriorate as readily as had been assumed. For some individuals, declining mobility leads to loss of independence and the ability to participate in social and recreational interactions with family and friends. Because of the rapid growth in size of the aging population, the need to prevent and treat musculoskeletal disorders among middle-aged and elderly people will increase more than ever before. Impairments of the musculoskeletal system may result from changes in the bones or soft tissues that form the muscles, articular cartilage, intervertebral disks, tendons, ligaments, and joint capsules. Fractures associated with age-related alterations in bone cause severe morbidity and, in some cases, mortality; however, they do not cause impairment for as many older people as do weakness, pain with movement, and restriction of motion caused by changes in the soft tissues.82 Although any part of the musculoskeletal system may be affected, the back and the lower extremities are the most frequently reported locations of musculoskeletal impairment. In addition to the decrease in musculoskeletal function caused by the development of age-related degenerative disorders, loss of tissue strength with age83 may increase the probability or severity of soft tissue damage from a given trauma. Recent research has shown that degenerative changes after tissue insult do not progress uniformly and that intervention may alter their progression.81 Thus, there is a clear need to disseminate knowledge of the basic processes of aging and the methods for maintaining and improving musculoskeletal function in older individuals, both as a preventative measure and as an element in the care of the deconditioned patient. Although loss of skeletal muscle mass and declining strength with age appear to be inevitable, a number of variables may slow these changes. Many investigators have found convincing evidence that exercise increases the strength of older individuals by increasing muscle mass, cross-sectional areas, contractile proteins, motor unit recruitment, and oxidative capacity of the muscular system. Exercise improves other aspects of the aging individual's life, such as confidence performing activity requiring some agility. Postural Changes Associated with Aging Posture can be defined as the relationship of each body structure to the entire structure. The observed increase in the US older adult population (older than 65) is associated with a rise in the number of members of this population participating in athletic activities.84 Although postural dyscontrol is associated with the older adult population, it may be a byproduct not necessarily of the aging process but rather of sedentary lifestyle; physical activity appears to play a key role in maintaining good postural control.85 Schafer86 reports that anatomists and neurophysiologists no longer question the significance of the entire proprioceptive and neuroreceptor distribution in the ligamentous and myologic elements of the spine and pelvis when considering dynamic or static posture. Evidence suggests that the interplay between curvature and the ligaments that maintain it imparts a resilience that is important in protecting the vertebral column against excessive compressive forces and strains that may be encountered in various postures and during movement. It has been noted that some cases of back pain are attributable to abnormal posture or marked alterations of the curve.87 Earlier studies by Allbrook40 and Erickson88, 89 showed that there were significant changes in the dimensions of the lumbar vertebral bodies with age. Histologic studies83, 90 have clarified that the iliolumbar ligamentous apparatus and sacroiliac ligamentous apparatus, which play an important role in the mechanics of the lumbosacral junction, undergo extensive morphologic changes from birth to maturity, resulting in marked transformation of its structure and presumably its functional characteristics affecting posture. The concept of a generalized aging effect on posture and the balance mechanism has been identified and discussed by a number of researchers.91 Neurophysiologic models of sensorimotor control of posture and movement are evolving rapidly. Because postural instability is so common in the aged population group, it is considered by one model as an inevitable aging effect resulting from widespread degeneration of the musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, and sensory systems. Postural control requires the ability to correctly predict, as well as detect and encode, the characteristics of any active or passive disturbance in posture. In unusual sensory environments, this may require selecting the most reliable source of sensory information available from the mechanoreceptors. Postural control also requires the ability to select and finely adapt a corrective or protective response and to execute that response within the biomechanical constraints of the body and the physical constraints of the environment. The proper postural neuroreceptive field will depend on the individuals' ability to select an appropriate postural response, to match the magnitude of the response to the magnitude of the disturbance, and to execute the chosen response quickly and effectively. Thus, any disruption in the ability to coordinate and move muscles and joints effectively and efficiently must necessarily compromise postural stability.91 Because patterns of neural activity from the central nervous system must be implemented by the body's musculoskeletal system, postural stability is necessarily constrained by the body's biomechanics, including joint mobility and the distribution and quality of muscle strength. Although postural control may be divided into motor and sensory components, it is clear that posture is a complex feedforward reflex mechanism requiring intact receptors and sufficient muscle fiber density for control. When the body is traumatized, internal and/or external stress factors will involve the nervous system, directly or indirectly, resulting in decreased mobility of the vertebrae of the involved neuroarticular complex. This decreased mobility may be the result of muscle splinting, especially on the side of greatest stimulation according to Pfluger's Law5 or from abnormal weight distribution to the superior facets and other structures of the vertebrae involved. Pfluger's Law5 states that, if a stimulus received by a sensory nerve extends to a motor nerve of the opposite side, contraction occurs only from corresponding muscles, and if contraction is unequal bilaterally, the stronger contraction always takes place on the side that is stimulated. When affecting 1 or more vertebrae, this state of decreased mobility of the motion unit encourages neuronal dysfunction leading to pathologic alterations in the area supplied by the neurocomplex. Depending on the degree and chronicity of involvement, these may or may not lead to a manifestation of the degenerative process. Palpable alterations of the normal anatomic relationships of one joint to another are frequently found. These mechanical changes may occur in the static recumbent, sitting, or standing positions, as related to the various ranges of motion the spine and its individual segments are put through during daily activity. Prolonged immobilization such as occurs in posttraumatic support or disuse may lead to greatly diminished joint lubrication, as well as atrophy of muscle, cartilage, and subcutaneous fat, along with chronic circulation disturbances, capsular contraction, and bone decalcification. Gozna and Harrington,92 in their description of the biomechanics of musculoskeletal injury, describe this clinical picture in detail. Both degenerative processes and aging factors may contribute to functional and postural changes that occur at the articular complex. Aging decreases articular cartilage permeability up to the age of about 40, after which an increase in permeability begins to develop.92 However, aging has little or no influence on the elastic properties of articular cartilage, while its effect on tensile strength is as yet unknown. Microtrauma and/or macrotrauma with inflammation will increase the permeability of synovial vessels, thus allowing influx of plasma that will adversely alter the joint's mechanical properties. Any joint fixation or subluxation will produce abnormal unilateral loads which tend to break down articular cartilage.93 Even in a well-lubricated joint with continuous immobilization in a forced position, chondrocytes will die and degenerative arthritis will be encouraged. Its extent, from superficial to deep involvement, is proportional to the duration of the “fixation compression.” In addition, the protein polysaccharide complexes become depleted. The cartilage becomes unable to withstand stress as movement occurs and degenerative, sometimes painful changes develop. This invariably sets the stage for alterations in the neuroarticular complex, as well as a habitual postural imbalance caused by the adaptive mechanism secondary to this degenerative process. Postural changes then may be the result of gross structural alterations that may become neuropathologic with age. Yet, as was stated earlier, aging does not necessarily mean a neuropathologic status of the individual. Conclusion  It can be seen from the previously mentioned studies that aging of the neuroarticular complex may be one of the areas of the human body that has not been thoroughly researched. Many studies indicate that dynamic structural and functional changes do occur with age. It is not known what extent of change results from reduced physical activity or from pure aging. Support for the notion that decreased activity level plays an important role in the production of aging changes in the neuroarticular complex comes from hypokinetic studies involving inactivity and muscle disuse atrophy, which revealed similar changes, in many respects, to those described at aged neuromuscular junctions.15, 21, 94 Some aspects of the decline in motor performance seem more related to the general decrease in physical activity commonly accompanying senescence than to increasing age. Physically active subjects sustain their exercise capacity and maximal oxygen uptake into senescence better than their sedentary colleagues.57 A decline of these indices occurs in healthy young subjects during prolonged bed rest. Training can not only increase the physical working capacity of sedentary subjects but it can also improve the heart rate, cardiac output, and blood pressure in the elderly. It also helps increase joint mobility and stimulation of receptors subserving the joint motion segment. Activity reduces stiffness and may prevent fibrotic infiltration and induce central neural reflexes. Epidemiologic studies indicate that physical activity contributes to longevity by decreasing the rate of coronary heart disease. Activity may also increase the longevity of tissues associated with the joint motion segment and neuroarticular complex by maintaining synaptic connections associated with normal postural muscle tone, thus inhibiting degeneration from disuse. Although the age-related alterations in the synthesis and degradation of neurotransmitters and their receptors could explain some of the characteristics of senescence, Kirkaldy-Willis20 seems to think trauma may contribute more. An insignificant amount of information is reported by Schafer86 on aging in his treaties on musculoskeletal actions and reactions but does admit that any joint misalignment (eg, subluxation, apposition, genu distortions) produce abnormal unilateral loads which tend to breakdown articular cartilage. It is certain that there is a loss of the neuroreceptive field in the elderly and this loss may begin as early as 50 years of age. A great deal more research is needed in the areas of biomechanics, pathophysiology, chiropractic, and medicine. They may give us some of the answers to the illusive questions of the aging neuroarticular complex, questions that the research minds in the chiropractic profession must find essential for the future. References  1. 1Youdim KA, Joseph JA. A possible emerging role of phytochemicals in improving age related neurological functions; a multiplicity of effects. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001;30(6):583–594. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
2. 2Jette A, Branch L, Berlin J. Musculoskeletal impairments and physical disablement among the aged. J Gerontol. 1990;45:M203–M208. MEDLINE 3. 3Axelrod S, Cohen L. Senescence and embedded-figure performance in vision and touch. J Gerontol. 1961;12:283. 4. 4McCritchley . Neurological changes in the aged. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1956;35:198. MEDLINE 5. 5Dorlands Medical Dictionary. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1988;. 6. 6Levy MR, Dignan M, Shirrefs JH. In: Essentials of life and health. New York: Random House; 1988;p. 413. 7. 7Nohl H. Involvement of free radicals in aging; a consequence or cause of senescence. Brit Med Bull. 1993;49:653–667. MEDLINE 8. 8Pressman AH. Metabolic toxicity and neuromuscular pain, joint disorders and fibromyalgia. JACA. 1993;77–78. 9. 9McCormick A, Campsis J. Cellular aging and senescence. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991;3:230–234. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
10. 10Hayflick L. In: How and why we age. New York: Ballantine Books; 1994;p. 44–148. 11. 11Najlerahim A, Francis PT, Bowen DM. Age-related alteration in excitatory amino acid neurotransmission in rat brain. Neurobiol Aging. 1990;11:155–158. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
12. 12Donzanti BA, Ung K. Alterations in neurotransmitter amino acid content in the aging rat striatum are subregional dependent. Neurobiol Aging. 1990;11:159–162. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
13. 13Albert M. Neuropsychological and neurophysiological changes in healthy adult humans across the age range. Neurobiol Aging. 1993;14:623–625. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
14. 14Scheibel ME, Scheibel AB. In: Structural changes in the aging brain. Clinical, morphological and neurochemical aspects in the aging nervous system. vol 1:New York: Aging Series, Raven Press; 1995;p. 11. 15. 15Andonian MR, Fahim MA. Effects of endurance exercise on the morphology of mouse neuromuscular junctions during aging. J Neurocytol. 1987;16:589–599. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
16. 16Bolton C, Winkleman R, Dyck P. A quantitative study of meissner's corpuscles in man. Neurology. 1966;16:1. MEDLINE 17. 17Swash M, Fox K. The effect of age on human skeletal muscle. Studies of the morphology and innervation of muscle spindles. J Neurol Sci. 1972;16:417.
CrossRef
18. 18Dyck P, Schultz P, O'Brien P. Quanitation of touch pressure sensation. Arch Neurol. 1972;26:465. MEDLINE 19. 19Buckwalter J, Rosenberg L. Structural changes during development in bovine fetal epiphyseal cartilage. Coll Relat Res. 1983;3:489–504. 20. 20Kirkaldy-Willis WH. In: Managing low back pain. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988;p. 25–26. 21. 21Alshuaib WB, Fahim MA. Effect of exercise on physiological age-related change at mouse neuromuscular junctions. Neurobiol Aging. 1990;11:555–561. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
22. 22Chappard D, Alexander CH, Robert JM, Riffat G. Relationships between bone and skin atrophies during aging. Acta Anat (Basel). 1991;141:239–244. MEDLINE 23. 23Pineda S, Pollack A, Stevenson S, Goldberg V, Caplan A. A semiquantitative scale for histological grading of articular cartilage repair. Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;143:335–340. MEDLINE 24. 24Schepelmann K, Meblinger K, Schmidt RF. The effects of phorbol ester on slowly conducting afferents of the cat's knee joint. Exp Brain Res. 1993;92:391–398. MEDLINE 25. 25Schmidt RE, Santiage BP, Parvin CA, Roth KA. Effect of diabetes and aging in human sympathetic autonomic ganglia. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:143–151. MEDLINE 26. 26Coventry M, Ghormley R, Kernohan J. The intervertebral disc: its microscopic anatomy and pathology. Part 2. Changes in the intervertebral disc concomitant with age. J Bone Joint Surg. 1945;27:105–247. 27. 27Hormel S, Eyre D. Collagen in the aging human intervertebral disc: an increase in covalently bound fuorophores and chromophores. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991;1078:243–250. MEDLINE 28. 28Maroudas A, Stockwell R, Nachemson A, Urban F. Factors involved in the nutrition of the human lumbar intravertebral disc: cellularity and diffusion of glucose in vitro. J Anat. 1975;120:113–130. MEDLINE 29. 29Ritchie J, Fahrni W. Experimental surgery, age changes in lumbar intervertebral discs. Can J Surg. 1970;13:65–71. 30. 30Bailey A, Herbert C, Jayson M. In: Collagen of the intervertebral disc; the lumbar spine and backache. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1976;p. 327–340. 31. 31Hallen A. Hexosamine and ester sulphate content of the human nucleus pulposus at different ages. Acta Chem Scand. 1958;12:1869–1872.
CrossRef
32. 32Hassler O. The human intervertebral disc. A micro-angiographical study on its vascular supply at various ages. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969;40:765–772. MEDLINE 33. 33Buckwalter J. The fine structure of human intervertebral disc. In: White A, Gordon S editor. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery Symposium on Idiopathic Low Back Pain. Mosby: St. Louis, MO; 1982;p. 489–504. 34. 34Adams P, Muir H. Qualitative changes with age of proteoglycans of human lumbar disk. Ann Rheum Dis. 1976;35:289–296. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
35. 35Gower W, Pedrini V. Age related variations in protein polysaccharides from human nucleus pulposus, annulusfibrosus and costal cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:1154–1162. MEDLINE 36. 36Hallen A. The collagen and ground substance of human disc at different ages. Acta Chem Scand. 1962;16:705–709.
CrossRef
37. 37Schmorl G, Junghanns H. In: The human spine in health and disease. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1971;p. 286–294. 38. 38Twomey L, Taylor J. Age changes in the lumbar intervertebral disc. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56:496–499. MEDLINE 39. 39Twomey L, Taylor J. Flexion creep deformation and hyteresis in the lumbar vertebral column. Spine. 1982;7:116–122. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
40. 40Allbrook DB. Changes in lumbar vertebral body height with age. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1956;14:35–39. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
41. 41Brown T, Hansen R, Yorra A. Some mechanical test on the lumbosacral spine with particular reference to the intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957;67:1135–1164. 42. 42Hanson T, Ross S. Microcalluses of the trabculae in lumbar vertebrae and their relation to the bone mineral content. Spine. 1981;6:375–380. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
43. 43Perey O. Fracture of the vertebral end-plate in the lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1957;25:1–101. MEDLINE 44. 44Humzah M, Soames R. Human intervertebral disc: structure and function. Anat Rec. 1988;220:337–356.
CrossRef
45. 45Ziv I, Rang M, Hoffman HJ. Paraplegia in osteogenesis imperfecta. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65:184–185. 46. 46Twomey L, Taylor J. Age changes in the lumbar articular triad. Aust J Physiother. 1984;31:106–112. 47. 47Knets IV. Adaptation and remodeling of articular cartilage and bone tissue, joint loading. Biol Health Artic Struct. 1990;10:251–259. 48. 48Yang K, King A. Mechanism of facet load transmission as a hypothesis for low back pain. Spine. 1984;9:557–565. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
49. 49Wolff J. Das gesetz der transformation der knocher. Berlin: Hirschwald; 1992;. 50. 50Roux W. Uber die sclbstregulation der lebervesen. Arch Entivicklungsmech. 1905;13:610–650. 51. 51Broom N, Marra R. Ultrastructural evidence for fibrilto fibril associations in articular cartilage and their functional implication. J Anat. 1986;146:185–200. MEDLINE 52. 52Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine. 1978;3:319–328. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
53. 53Bywaters E. The pathological anatomy of idiopathic low back pain. In: Gordon AW editors. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery Symposium on Idiopathic Low Back Pain. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1982;p. 144–177. 54. 54Anachemson EJ. Some mechanical properties of the third human lumbar interlaminar ligament (ligamentum flavum). J Biomech. 1968;1:211–220. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
55. 55Dumas G, Beaudoin L, Drouin G. In situ mechanical behavior of posterior spinal ligaments in the lumbar region: an in vitro study. J Biomech. 1987;20:301–310. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
56. 56Rhodin J. In: Histology: a text and atlas. London: Oxford University Press; 1974;p. 340–362. 57. 57Ishihara A, Taguchi S. Effect of exercise on age-related muscle atrophy. Neurobiol Aging. 1993;14:331–335. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
58. 58Tani H, Itoh H, Nagasaki H. Dynamic properties of the knee extensor muscles in young and elderly subjects. J Hum Muscle Perform. 1992;1(4):41–50. 59. 59Wilmore JH. In: Training for sport and activity-the physiological basis of the conditioning process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1982;p. 219–228. 60. 60Hochschuler SH. In: The spine in sports. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1990;p. 247–251. 61. 61Munsat T. Aging of the neuromuscular system. In: Albert ML editors. Clinical neurology of aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 1984;p. 412. 62. 62Brown W, Lingg C. Musculoskeletal complaints in an industry, annual complaint rate and diagnosis, absenteeism and economic loss. Arthritis Rheum. 1961;4:283–302.
CrossRef
63. 63Rebeiz J, Moore MJ, Holden EM, Adams RD. Variations in muscle status with age and systematic disease. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1972;22:127–144. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
64. 64Larson L. Morphological and functional characteristics of the aging skeletal muscle in man. Acta. 1978;457:1. 65. 65Scelsi R, Marchetti C, Poggio P. Vastus lateralis in sedentary old people (age 65-89 years). Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1980;512:99–105. 66. 66Hayward M. Automatic analysis of the electromyogram in healthy subjects of different ages. J Neurol Sci. 1977;33:397.
CrossRef
67. 67Campbell M, McComas A, Petro F. Physiological changes in aging muscles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1973;36:174–182. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
68. 68Serratrice G, Roux H, Aquaron R. Proximal muscular weakness in elderly subjects. J Neurol Sci. 1968;7:275–299.
CrossRef
69. 69Griffiths I, Duncan I. Age changes in the dorsal and ventral lumbar nerve roots of dogs. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1975;32:75. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
70. 70Rexed B. Fiber size in the peripheral nervous system of adults and old persons. Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand. 1944;33:164. 71. 71Kawamua Y, Okazaki H, O'Brien PC, Dyck PJ. Lumbar motoneurons of man: number and diameter histogram of alpha and gamma axons of ventral root. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1977;36:853. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
72. 72Gutmann E, Hanzlikova V. Motor unit in old age. Nature. 1966;209:921–922. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
73. 73Gutmann E, Hanzlikova V. The rate of regeneration of nerve. Exp Biol. 1972;19:14–44. 74. 74Gardner E. Decrease in human neurons with age. Anat Rec. 1940;77:529.
CrossRef
75. 75Mann D, Yates P. The effects of aging on the pigmented nerve cells of the human locus ceruleus and substantia nigra. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1979;47:93. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
76. 76Dyck P, Schultz P, O'Brien P. Quanitation of touch pressure sensation. Arch Neurol. 1972;465. 77. 77Birren J, Welford A. In: Age changes in speed of behavior: its central nature and physiological correlates. Behavior, aging and the nervous system. Springfield (IL): Thomas CC; 1963;p. 191. 78. 78Ferns SA, Kimbell R, Aitken JA, Warburton MJ. Role of fibronectin in the organization of the cytoskeleton during the spreading of rat mammary epithelia cells. Cell Biol Int Rep. 1992;16:207–216. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
79. 79Larson L, Grimby G, Karlsson J. Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology. J Appl Physiol. 1979;46:451–456. MEDLINE 80. 80Birren J. Translations in gerontology–from lab to life. Psychophysiology and speed of response. Am Psychol. 1974;29:808–815.
CrossRef
81. 81Lieberman HR, Wurtman JJ, Teicher MH. Circadian rhythms of activity on healthy young and elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging. 1989;10:259–265. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
82. 82Buckwalter JA, Woo SL, Goldberg VAL, Hodley EC, Booth F, Oegema TR, et al. Soft tissue aging and musculoskeletal function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1533–1548. MEDLINE 83. 83Gerloch UJ, Leirse W. Functional construction of the sacroiliac ligamentous apparatus. Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;144:97–102. MEDLINE 84. 84Morley JE. The aging athlete. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55:M627–M629. MEDLINE 85. 85McChesney JW. Balance testing benefits older adult athletes. J Biomech. 2002;XI:3. 86. 86Schafer RC. Clinical biomechanics…musculoskeletal actions and reactions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1983;. 87. 87Amonoo-Krofi HS. Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar spine during aging. Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;145:373–377. MEDLINE 88. 88Erickson MF. Some aspects of aging in the lumbar spine. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1956;48:359. 89. 89Erickson MF. Aging in the lumbar spine II. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978;48:241–246. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
90. 90Luk KDK, Ho HC, Leong JCY. The iliolumbar ligament: a study of its anatomy, development and clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:197–200. 91. 91Horak FB, Shupert CL, Mirka A. Components of postural dyscontrol in the elderly: a review. Neurobiol Aging. 1989;10:727–738. MEDLINE |
CrossRef
92. 92Gonza ER, Harrington IJ. Biomechanics of musculoskeletal injury. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1982;. 93. 93Redwood D. Contemporary chiropractic. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997;. 94. 94Leach RA. The chiropractic theories. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1986;. a Private practice of chiropractic, Fairhope, Ala John Stump, DC, OMD, EdD, Integrative Medicine Centre, 915 Plantation Blvd, Fairhope, AL 36532
PII: S0161-4754(04)00132-0 doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.06.007 © 2004 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | |
|