Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 27, Issue 8 , Pages 503-508, October 2004

Spinal Manipulation, Epidural Injections, and Self-Care for Sciatica: A Pilot Study for a Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Gert Bronfort, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, Minn.
    • Corresponding Author InformationGert Bronfort, DC, PhD, Northwestern Health Sciences University, 2501 W 84th Street, Bloomington, MN 55431
  • ,
  • Roni L. Evans, DC

      Affiliations

    • Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, Minn.
  • ,
  • Michele Maiers, DC

      Affiliations

    • Wolfe-Harris Center for Clinical Studies, Northwestern Health Sciences University, Bloomington, Minn.
  • ,
  • Alfred V. Anderson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Pain Assessment and Rehabilitation Center, Edina, Minn

Received 14 May 2003

Abstract 

Objective

To assess the feasibility of recruiting sciatica patients and to evaluate their compliance in preparation for a full-scale randomized clinical trial. We also aimed to determine the responsiveness of key outcome measures.

Methods

Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to spinal manipulation (n=11), epidural steroid injections (n=11), or self-care education (n=10). No between-group comparisons were planned because of the small sample size.

Results

At week 12 (the end of the treatment phase), the outcome measures indicating the most improvement/change were the Oswestry disability score (mean, 22.9; SD, 19.9; effect size [ES], 1.8), leg pain severity (mean, 2.9; SD, 1.7; ES, 1.7), and if the symptoms were bothersome (mean, 25.2; SD, 16.0; ES, 1.6). Twenty-four patients were either “very satisfied” or “completely satisfied,” and 22 of 32 patients reported 75% or 100% improvement. After 52 weeks, the outcome measure showing the most improvement/change was leg pain severity (mean, 2.3; SD, 2.6; ES, 1.35), followed by the Oswestry disability score (mean, 15.6; SD, 20; ES, 1.2) and if symptoms were bothersome (mean, 18.1; SD, 22.6; ES, 1.1). Eighteen patients were either “very satisfied” or “completely satisfied,” and 15 of 32 patients reported 75% or 100% improvement.

Conclusions

The results of this pilot study suggest that it is feasible to recruit subacute and chronic sciatica patients and to obtain their compliance for a full-scale randomized clinical.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research. Dr. Bronfort holds the Greenawalt Research Chair, funded through an unrestricted grant from Foot Levelers, Inc.

PII: S0161-4754(04)00159-9

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.08.002

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 27, Issue 8 , Pages 503-508, October 2004