Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 15-24 , January 2005

Consent or Submission? The Practice of Consent within UK Chiropractic

  • Jennifer M. Langworthy, MPhil

      Affiliations

    • Senior Research Fellow, Institute for Musculoskeletal Research & Clinical Implementation, [AECC], Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationJennifer M. Langworthy, MPhil, Senior Research Fellow, Institute for Musculoskeletal Research & Clinical Implementation, AECC, 13-15 Parkwood Road, Bournemouth, Dorrset BH5 SDF, United Kingdom.
  • ,
  • Christine le Fleming, BSc(Hons), MSc Chiropractic

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Thatcham Chiropractic Clinic, The Health Centre, Bath Road, Thatcham, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Received 29 September 2003 ,Revised 4 November 2003

References 

  1. General Medical Council. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. London: General Medical Council; 1998;
  2. Egan CD. Addressing use of herbal medicine in the primary care setting. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2002;14:166–171
  3. Department of Health. Good practice in consent implementation guide: consent to examination or treatment. London: Department of Health; 2001;
  4. Edozien L. How much information must be given for consent to be valid? The doctrine of informed consent. Clin Risk. 2001;7:136–140
  5. Burgess MM. Chiropractic informed consent. JCCA. 1990;34:24–26
  6. Pape T. Legal and ethical considerations of informed consent. Assoc Perioperative Reg Nurses. 1997;65:1122–1127
  7. Gatterman MI. Standards of practice relative to complications of and contraindications to spinal manipulative therapy. JCCA. 1991;35:232–236
  8. Sim J. Informed consent and manual therapy. Man Ther. 1996;2:104–106
  9. Seabright HR, Barbarash RA. Informed consent: clinical and legal issues in family practice. Clin Res Meth. 1994;26:244–249
  10. Smith A. Obtaining consent for examination and treatment: new government guide covers most of the bases. Br Med J. 2001;322:810–811
  11. Lloyd AJ. The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Saf Health Care. 2001;10:i14–i18
  12. Fuller R, Dudley N, Blacktop J. How informed is consent? Understanding of pictorial and verbal probability information by medical inpatients. Postgrad Med J. 2002;78:543–544
  13. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Respect for autonomy. In:  Beauchamp TL,  Childress JF editor. Principles of biomedical ethics. vol. 4:New York, NY: Oxford University Press Inc; 1994;p. 120–188
  14. Calman KC. Cancer: science and society and the communication of risk. Br Med J. 1996;313:799–802
  15. Haldeman S, Kohlbeck FJ, McGregor M. Risk factors and precipating neck movements causing vertebrobasilar artery dissection after cervical trauma and spinal manipulation. Spine. 1999;24:785–794
  16. Smith WS, Johnston SC, Skalabrin EJ, Weaver MS, Azari P, Albers GW, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy is an independent risk factor for vertebral artery dissection. Neurology. 2003;60:1424–1428
  17. Cote P, Kreitz BG, Cassidy D, Thiel H. The validity of the extension-rotation test as a clinical screening procedure before neck manipulation: a secondary analysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996;19:159–164
  18. Symons BP, Leonard T, Herzog W. Internal forces sustained by the vertebral artery during spinal manipulative therapy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:504–510
  19. Boggs SE. Informed consent: the patient's right to choose. J Chiropr. 1992;29:36–42
  20. Carey P. Informed consent – the new reality. JCCA. 1988;32:91–94
  21. Sava H, Matlow PT, Sole MJ. Legal liability of physicians in medical research. Clin Invest Med. 1994;17:148–184
  22. Hufnagel A, Hammers A, Schonle PW, Bohm KD, Leonhardt G. Stroke following chiropractic manipulation of the cervical spine. J Neurology. 1999;246:683–688
  23. Norton L. Complementary therapies in practice: the ethical issues. J Clin Nursing. 1995;4:343–348
  24. Aveyard H. Implied consent prior to nursing care procedures. J Adv Nursing. 2002;39:201–207
  25. Epstein NE. It is easier to confuse a jury than convince a judge: the crisis in medical malpractice. Spine. 2002;27:2425–2430
  26. Cowan J. Consent and Clinical goverance: improving standards and skills. Br J Clin Governance. 2000;5:124–128
  27. Studdert DM. Legal issues in the delivery of alternative medicine. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1999;54:173–176
  28. Norman RG. Retrospective analysis of medical malpractice claims data from members of the British Chiropractic Association. Bournemouth: AECC Dissertation BSc(Hons) Chiropractic Sciences; 2002;
  29. Moyle S. Health care practice and the minimisation of patient medical litigation. Aust Health Rev. 1999;22:44–48
  30. Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health. Review of Professional Indemnity Arrangements for Healthcare Professionals – Compensation and Professional Indemnity in Healthcare (Tito Report) Final Report, November 1995.
  31. Jamison J. Informed consent: an Australian case study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:348–355
  32. General Chiropractic Council. Code of Practice. London: GGC; 1999;
  33. Phaosavasdi S, Tannirandorn Y, Taneepanichskul S, Kullavanijaya P. Informed consent. J Med Assoc Thailand. 2002;85:850–853
  34. Karparti v Spira & Ors, NSW Supreme Court No. 15853/92 – 6.6.95, Spender AJ.
  35. Terrett A. Misuse of the literature by medical authors in discussing spinal manipulative injury. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:203–210
  36. Gallagher S. Competency in informed consent. Ostomy Wound Management. 1999;45:10–12
  37. Tan NHSS. Deconstructing paternalism – what serves the patient best?. Singapore Med J. 2002;43:148–151
  38. Buller T. Competence and risk-relativity. Bioethics. 2001;15:93–109
  39. Etchells E, Sharpe G, Dykeman MJ, Meslin EM, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 4. Voluntariness. CMAJ. 1996;155:1083–1086
  40. Demarco JP. Competence and paternalism. Bioethics. 2002;16:231–245
  41. Miller CK, O'Donnell DC, Searight R, Barbarash RA. The Deaconess informed consent comprehension test: an assessment tool for clinical research subjects. Pharmacotherapy. 1996;16:872–878
  42. Doyal L. Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?. Qual Saf Health Care. 2001;10:i29–i33
  43. Langille DB, Kaufman DM, Laidlaw TA, Sargeant J, MacLeod H. Faculty attitudes towards medical communication and their perceptions of students' communication skills training at Dalhousie University. J Med Educ. 2001;35:548–554
  44. Srinivasan J. Observing communication skills for informed consent: an examiner's experience. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1999;32:437–440
  45. Gausman BJ, Forman WB. Comprehension of written health care information in an affluent geriatric retirement community: use of the Test of Functional Health Literacy. Gerontology. 2002;48:93–97
  46. Quill T, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763–769
  47. Lim LS. Medical paternalism serves the patient best. Singapore Med J. 2002;43:143–147
  48. Chin JJ. Doctor-patient relationship: from medical paternalism to enhanced autonomy. Singapore Med J. 2002;43:152–155
  49. Charles G, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making process about treatment?. Br Med J. 1999;319:780–782
  50. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Gwyn R, Grol R. Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars. Br Med J. 1999;319:753–756
  51. Katz J. Informed consent – a fairy tale?: law's vision. Univ Pitts Law Rev. 1977;39:137–174
  52. Haswell K. Informed choice and consent for cervical spine manipulation. Aust J Physiotherapy. 1996;42:149–155
  53. Braaten EB, Handelsman MM. Client preferences for informed consent information. Ethics Behav. 1997;7:311–328
  54. Hewlett S. Consent to clinical research – adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?. J Med Ethics. 1996;22:232–237
  55. Blackston JW, Bouldin MJ, Brown CA, Duddleston DN, Hicks GS, Holman HE. Malpractice risk prevention for primary care physicians. Am J Med Sci. 2002;324:212–219
  56. Secretary-of-State for Health. 29/01/2001 – BBC News. News.bbc.co.uk

PII: S0161-4754(04)00264-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.12.010

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 15-24 , January 2005