Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 187-193, March 2005

Determining the Relationship Between Cervical Lordosis and Neck Complaints

  • Jeb McAviney, MS(Chiro)

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Belfast, Ireland
  • ,
  • Dan Schulz, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Richard Bock, MS(Chiro)

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Melbourne, Australia
  • ,
  • Deed E. Harrison, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Elko, Nev; vice president, CBP NonProfit, Inc., Evanston, Wyo
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Deed Harrison, DC, 123 Second Street, Elko, NV 89801.
  • ,
  • Burt Holland, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Statistics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa

Received 19 August 2003; received in revised form 8 January 2004

Objective

To investigate the presence of a “functionally normal” cervical lordosis and identify if this and the amount of forward head posture are related to neck complaints.

Methods

Using the posterior tangent method, an angle of cervical lordosis was measured from C2 through C7 vertebrae on 277 lateral cervical x-rays. Anterior weight bearing was measured as the horizontal distance of the posterior superior body of the C2 vertebra compared to a vertical line drawn superiorly from the posterior inferior body of the C7 vertebra. The measurements were sorted into 2 groups, cervical complaint and noncervical complaint groups. The data were then partitioned into age by decades, sex, and angle categories.

Results

Patients with lordosis of 20° or less were more likely to have cervicogenic symptoms (P < .001). The association between cervical pain and lordosis of 0° or less was significant (P < .0001). The odds that a patient with cervical pain had a lordosis of 0° or less was 18 times greater than for a patient with a noncervical complaint. Patients with cervical pain had less lordosis and this was consistent over all age ranges. Males had larger median cervical lordosis than females (20° vs 14°) (2-sided Mann-Whitney U test, P = .016). When partitioned by age grouping, this trend is significant only in the 40- to 49-year-old range (2-sided Mann-Whitney U test, P < .01).

Conclusion

We found a statistically significant association between cervical pain and lordosis <20° and a “clinically normal” range for cervical lordosis of 31° to 40°. Maintenance of a lordosis in the range of 31° to 40° could be a clinical goal for chiropractic treatment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sources of financial support: CBP, Nonprofit, Inc.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00059-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.02.015

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 3 , Pages 187-193, March 2005