Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 265.e1-265.e7 , May 2005

Pressures Generated During Spinal Manipulation and Their Association With Hand Anatomy

  • Stephen M. Perle, DC, MS

      Affiliations

    • University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic
  • ,
  • Gregory N. Kawchuk, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G4
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Gregory Kawchuk, DC, PhD, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, 2-28 Corbett Hall, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G4

Received 29 November 2004

References 

  1. Peterson DH, Bergmann TF. In: Chiropractic technique: principles and procedures. New York: Mosby; 2002;p. 97–174
  2. Assendelft WJ, Morton SC, Yu EI, Suttorp MJ, Shekelle PG. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:871–881
  3. Gal J, Herzog W, Kawchuk G, Conway PJ, Zhang YT. Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:30–40
  4. Herzog W, Zhang YT, Conway PJ, Kawchuk GN. Cavitation sounds during spinal manipulative treatments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16:523–526
  5. Herzog W, Conway PJ, Zhang YT, Gál J, Guimaraes ACS. Reflex responses associated with manipulative treatments on the thoracic spine: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:233–236
  6. Nathan M, Keller TS. Measurement and analysis of the in vivo posteroanterior impulse response of the human thoracolumbar spine: a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994;17:431–441
  7. Solinger AB. Theory of small vertebral motions: an analytical model compared to data. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000;15:87–94
  8. Suter E, Herzog W, Conway PJ, Zhang YT. Reflex response associated with manipulative treatment of the thoracic spine. J Neuromusculoskeletal Syst. 1994;2:124–130
  9. Suter E, McMorland G, Herzog W, Bray R. Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint manipulation in patients with anterior knee pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:149–153
  10. Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Gunzburg R, Vandeputte K, Fuhr AW. Neurophysiologic response to intraoperative lumbosacral spinal manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:447–457
  11. Pickar JG, Wheeler JD. Response of muscle proprioceptors to spinal manipulative-like loads in the anesthetized cat. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:2–11
  12. Dishman JD, Cunningham BM, Burke J. Comparison of tibial nerve H-reflex excitability after cervical and lumbar spine manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:318–325
  13. Dishman JD, Ball KA, Burke J. Central motor excitability changes after spinal manipulation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:1–9
  14. Dyck V, Embree B. The enigma of referred abdominal pain in chiropractic practice: a literature review and case report. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1981;4:11–14
  15. DeBoer K, Schultz M, McKnight M. Acute effects of spinal manipulation on gastrointestinal myoelectric activity in conscious rabbits. Man Med. 1988;3:85–94
  16. Sato A, Swenson R. Sympathetic nervous system response to mechanical stress of the spinal column in rats. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1984;7:141–148
  17. Verhoef MJ, Page SA, Waddell SC. The chiropractic outcome study: pain, functional ability and satisfaction with care. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:235–240
  18. Suter E, McMorland G. Decrease in elbow flexor inhibition after cervical spine manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17:541–544
  19. Nyiendo J. Disabling low back Oregon Workers' Compensation claims. Part II: Time loss. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:231–239
  20. Triano J. The mechanics of spinal manipulation. In:  Herzog W editors. Clinical mechanics of spinal manipulation. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000;p. 92–190
  21. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Skogsbergh DR. Use of chiropractic manipulation in lumbar rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1997;34:394–404
  22. Herzog W, Conway PJ, Kawchuk GN, Zhang Y, Hasler EM. Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy. Spine. 1993;18:1206–1212
  23. Gál JM, Herzog W, Kawchuk GN, Conway PJ, Zhang Y-T. Forces and relative vertebral movements during SMT to unembalmed post-rigor human cadavers: peculiarities associated with joint cavitation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:4–9
  24. Bereznick DE, Ross JK, McGill SM. The frictional properties at the thoracic skin-fascia interface: implications in spine manipulation. Clin Biomech. 2002;17:297–303
  25. Herzog W, Kats M, Symons B. The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation. Spine. 2001;26:2105–2110
  26. Perle SM, Kawchuk GN. Radiographically determined anatomical location of point of peak pressure during pisiform and hypothenar contact manipulation procedures: a pilot study. J Chiropr Educ. 2002;16:42
  27. Perle SM. The illusion of specificity. J Am Chiropr Assoc. 2002;39:30–31
  28. Seffinger M, Adams A, Najm W, Dickerson V, Mishra SI, Reinsch S, et al. Spinal palpatory diagnostic procedures utilized by practitioners of spinal manipulation: annotated bibliography of content validity and reliability studies. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2003;47:93–109
  29. Kawchuk GN, Fauvel OR. Sources of variation in spinal indentation testing: indentation site relocation, intraabdominal pressure, subject movement, muscular response, and stiffness estimation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:84–91
  30. Ebraheim NA, Inzerillo C, Xu R. Are anatomic landmarks reliable in determination of fusion level in posterolateral lumbar fusion?. Spine. 1999;24:973–974
  31. O'Haire C, Gibbons P. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Man Ther. 2000;5:13–20
  32. Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE. Motion palpation: it's time to accept the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:568–571
  33. Haas M, Taylor JA, Gillette RG. The routine use of radiographic spinal displacement analysis: a dissent. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:254–259
  34. French SD, Green S, Forbes A. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:231–238
  35. Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C. Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:258–275
  36. Meeker WC, Haldeman S. Chiropractic: a profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:216–227
  37. Coulter ID, Hurwitz EL, Adams AH, Genovese BJ, Hays R, Shekelle PG. Patients using chiropractors in North America: who are they, and why are they in chiropractic care?. Spine. 2002;27:291–296
  38. Kirstukas SJ, Backman JA, Pope MH, Sandman TD, Smit EL, Ustas LM, et al. Loading to the patient during crossed bilateral thoracic manipulation. In:  Rosner T editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spinal Manipulation; 2000 Sep 21-23; Bloomington, MN. Norwalk (Iowa): Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research; 2000;p. 164
  39. Haas M, Groupp E, Panzer D, Partna L, Lumsden S, Aickin M. Efficacy of cervical endplay assessment as an indicator for spinal manipulation. Spine. 2003;28:1091–1096
  40. Reggars JW, Pollard HP. Analysis of zygapophyseal joint cracking during chiropractic manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:65–71
  41. Ross JK, Bereznick DE, McGill SM. Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?. Spine. 2004;29:1452–1457

 Sources of support: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Chiropractic Association and the University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00082-5

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.03.005

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 265.e1-265.e7 , May 2005