Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 278-284, May 2005

False Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results: A Report of 2 Cases

  • Michael Schneider, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private practice of chiropractic; PhD student, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Michael Schneider, DC, 1720 Washington Road, Suite 201, Pittsburgh, PA 15241
  • ,
  • Steven Santolin, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private practice of chiropractic, Joliet, Ill
  • ,
  • Patrick Farrell, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private practice of chiropractic, Director, Farrell Radiology Consultants, Greensburg, Pa

Received 23 June 2003; received in revised form 5 November 2003

Sources of support: none.

Abstract 

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to present 2 clinical case studies in which large herniated disks were not detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), leading to false negative results, and discuss some issues regarding potential shortcomings of MRI.

Clinical Features

Cases of cervical and lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) are presented. Each patient had severe pain and neurological deficit. The patients had positive physical examination findings suggestive of HNP despite the negative MRI scans. Both subsequently underwent myelography and computed tomography to arrive at the final and definitive diagnosis of HNP.

Intervention and Outcome

Both patients failed a course of conservative care that included manual and mechanical traction, manual mobilization, myofascial release techniques, epidural steroid injections, oral steroid and narcotic medications, and rehabilitative exercises. Both patients eventually required surgical decompression.

Conclusion

False negative MRI results in these cases of large HNPs emphasize the importance of case history and physical examination findings as the basis for ordering diagnostic tests. The conclusion of this article is simple; no single diagnostic test should be considered as 100% accurate, as false negative studies may occur that may mislead the patient and clinician.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(05)00088-6

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.03.011

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 4 , Pages 278-284, May 2005