Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 381-385, July 2005

The Nordic Back Pain Subpopulation Program: Validation and Improvement of a Predictive Model for Treatment Outcome in Patients With Low Back Pain Receiving Chiropractic Treatment

  • Iben Axén, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Jess James Jones, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Annika Rosenbaum, BAppSc(Chiro)

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Linköping, Sweden
  • ,
  • Peter W. Lövgren, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Stockholm, Sweden
  • ,
  • Laszlo Halasz, MHSc(ClinBiomech)

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Lund, Sweden
  • ,
  • Kristian Larsen, PT, MPH

      Affiliations

    • The Medical Research Unit in Ringkjøbing County, Denmark
  • ,
  • Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, DC, MPH, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, The Back Research Center, Backcenter Funen and University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, DC, MPH, PhD, The Back Research Center, Backcenter Funen and University of Southern Denmark, Lindevej 5, DK-5750 Ringe, Denmark.

Received 22 January 2004

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for treatment outcome in patients with low back pain (LBP) receiving chiropractic treatment.

Methods

This multicenter practice-based predictive validity study was conducted in private chiropractic practices in Sweden. Of 64 previously compliant chiropractors, 58 recruited a maximum of 30 consecutive patients with LBP each. Information was provided on 1061 patients, of which 1057 questionnaires were valid. Chiropractic treatment was decided by the treating chiropractor. The outcome variable was the self-reported “definite improvement” at the fourth visit. The predictor variables included model 1, 3 hypothesized prognostic groups (best, intermediate, and least favorable) based on clinical information collected at baseline and at the second visit; and 4 additional models based on the following variables: age, sex, pain intensity during past 24 hours, description of disability, duration and pattern of pain during present attack, total duration of pain, and pain pattern during the past 12 months.

Results

Three of our factors were best at predicting the absence of improvement by the fourth visit and were able to correctly classify 79% of patients and to cover 74% of the receiver operated characteristics curve. These were (1) no definite overall improvement by the second treatment, (2) presence of leg pain, and (3) the minimum total duration of pain over the last 12 months being 30 days.

Conclusion

In this study, patients with LBP who also had leg pain and LBP occurring sufficiently frequently or having lasted sufficiently long to add up to at least 30 days in the past year, and who did not report definite general improvement by the second treatment were not good candidates for short-term recovery. It is suggested that patients who fit the criteria of potential nonresponders should be carefully monitored to allow a selective approach of care.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sources of support: Funding was provided by the Swedish Chiropractors' Association, and the last author was employed at the Medical Research Unit in Ringkjøbing County, Denmark, at the time of the study.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00169-7

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.008

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 381-385, July 2005