Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 408-413, July 2005

Interobserver Reliability of Neck-Mobility Measurement by Means of the Flock-of-Birds Electromagnetic Tracking System

  • Nienke Assink

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Nienke Assink, Centre for Rehabilitation, University Hospital Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Gert J.D. Bergman, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Medical Centre Groningen, and Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Bianca Knoester, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jan C. Winters, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Medical Centre Groningen, and Department of General Practice, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Pieter U. Dijkstra, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Klaas Postema, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 22 April 2004; received in revised form 7 October 2004

Abstract 

Objective

To establish the interobserver reliability for measuring neck mobility in human subjects by means of an electromagnetic tracking device, the Flock-of-Birds system.

Methods

Two observers independently and in random order assessed the cervical range-of-motion in 30 subjects with a dysfunction in the neck and shoulder region (symptomatic subjects) and 30 subjects without known pathology (asymptomatic subjects). Measurements included rotation in neutral position, in flexed position and in extended position, flexion-extension, and lateral bending (all active and passive). Reliability was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and agreement by limits of agreement and percentage of paired observations within 5°, 10°, and 15°.

Results

For asymptomatic subjects, the ICC varied from 0.57 to 0.85, and the limits of agreement varied between 14.5° and 27.0°.The percentage of paired observations within 5°, 10°, and 15° ranged from 31% to 57%, 58% to 90%, and 78% to 93%, respectively. For symptomatic subjects, the ICC varied from 0.36 to 0.91, and the limits of agreement varied between 9.6° and 37.8°. The percentage of paired observations within 5°, 10°, and 15° ranged from 17% to 60%, 33% to 93%, and 50% to 97%, respectively.

Conclusions

Despite the use of a standardized protocol and a sophisticated measurement system, the interobserver reliability of neck mobility was variable in quality, with reliability being good in rotation in neutral position, flexion-extension, and lateral bending. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28:408-413)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Financial support was received from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (grant number 904-65-901) and “Stichting Anna Fonds.”

PII: S0161-4754(05)00170-3

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.009

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 408-413, July 2005