Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 465-471, September 2005

Spinal Manipulation Alters Electromyographic Activity of Paraspinal Muscles: A Descriptive Study

  • James W. DeVocht, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: James W. DeVocht, DC, PhD, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 741 Brady Street, Davenport, IA 52803, USA
  • ,
  • Joel G. Pickar, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • ,
  • David G. Wilder, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Received 14 November 2003; received in revised form 8 January 2004; accepted 8 April 2004.

Abstract 

Objective

To examine the effect of spinal manipulation on electromyographic (EMG) activity in areas of localized tight muscle bundles of the low back.

Methods

Surface EMG activity was collected from 16 participants in 2 chiropractic offices during the 5 to 10 minutes of the treatment protocol. Electrodes were placed over the 2 sites of greatest paraspinal muscle tension as determined by manual palpation. Spinal manipulation was administered to 8 participants using Activator protocol; the other 8 were treated using Diversified protocol.

Results

Electromyographic activity decreased by at least 25% after treatment in 24 of the 31 sites that were monitored. There was less than 25% change at 3 sites and more than 25% increase at 4 sites. Multiple distinct increases and decreases were observed in many data plots.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that manipulation induces a virtually immediate change, usually a reduction, in resting EMG levels in at least some patients with low back pain and tight paraspinal muscle bundles. In some cases, EMG activity increased during the treatment protocol and then usually, but not always, decreased to a level lower than the pretreatment level.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sources of support: This project was internally funded.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00180-6

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.07.002

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 465-471, September 2005