Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 526-533, September 2005

Manipulation Under Anesthesia: A Report of Four Cases

  • Edward Cremata, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Fremont, Calif
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Edward Cremata, DC, Fremont Chiropractic Group, 38069 Martha Ave, Suite 200, Fremont, CA 94536.
  • ,
  • Stephen Collins, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Fremont, Calif
  • ,
  • William Clauson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Medicine, Fremont, Calif
  • ,
  • Alan B. Solinger, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Private school, Clark Magnet HS, La Crescenta, Calif
  • ,
  • Edward S. Roberts, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private school, Clark Magnet HS, La Crescenta, Calif

Received 16 January 2004; received in revised form 8 December 2004

Abstract 

Objective

To report the results of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for 4 patients with chronic spinal, sacroiliac, and/or pelvic and low back pain.

Methods

The treatment group was arbitrarily selected from the chiropractor's patient base who received the MUA protocol along with a follow-up in-office articular and myofascial release program that mimics the MUA procedures. The chiropractic adjustments and articular and myofascial release procedures were performed in a chiropractic office. The MUA procedures were performed in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center. Patients with chronic pain who had not adequately responded to conservative medical and/or a reasonable trial (4 months minimum) of chiropractic adjustments, and had no contraindications to anesthesia or adjustments, were selected. The 4 patients went through 3 consecutive days of MUA followed by an 8-week protocol of the same procedures plus physiotherapy in-office without anesthesia. Data included pre- and post-MUA passive ranges of motion, changes in the visual analog scale, and neurologic and orthopedic examination findings. The patients had follow-up varying from 9 to 18 months.

Results

Increases in passive ranges of motion, decreases in the visual analog scale rating, and diminishment of subsequent visit frequency were seen in each of the patients.

Conclusion

Manipulation under anesthesia was an effective approach to restoring articular and myofascial movements for these 4 patients who did not adequately respond to either medical and/or in-office conservative chiropractic adjustments and adjunctive techniques. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28:526-533)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sources of support: No external funding was reported for the production of this report.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00189-2

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.07.011

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 7 , Pages 526-533, September 2005