Journal Home
Search for

Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 564-569 (October 2005)


View previous. 7 of 21 View next.

Effects of a Managed Chiropractic Benefit on the Use of Specific Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures in the Treatment of Low Back and Neck Pain

Craig F. Nelson, DC, MSaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, R. Douglas Metz, DCb, Thomas LaBrot, DCc

Received 7 December 2004

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was to measure the effects of a managed chiropractic benefit on the rates of specific diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for the treatment of back pain and neck pain.

Design

This study is a retrospective analysis of claims data from a managed-care health plan over a 4-year period. The use rates of advanced imaging, surgery, inpatient care, and plain-film radiographs were compared between employer groups with and without a chiropractic benefit.

Results

For patients with low back pain, the use rates of all 4 studied procedures were lower in the group with chiropractic coverage. On a per-episode basis, the rates in the group with coverage were reduced by the following: surgery (−32.1%); computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (−37.2%); plain-film radiography (−23.1%); and inpatient care (−40.1%). On a per-patient basis, the rates were reduced by the following: surgery (−13.7%); CT/MRI (−20.3%); plain-film radiography (−2.2%); and inpatient care (−24.8%). For patients with neck pain, the use rates were reduced per episode in the group with chiropractic coverage as follows: surgery (−49.4%); CT/MRI (−45.6%); plain-film radiography (−36.0%); and inpatient care (−49.5%). Per patient, the rates were surgery (−31.1%); CT/MRI (−25.7%); plain-film radiography (−12.5%); and inpatient care (31.1%). All group differences were statistically significant.

Conclusion

For the treatment of low back and neck pain, the inclusion of a chiropractic benefit resulted in a reduction in the rates of surgery, advanced imaging, inpatient care, and plain-film radiographs. This effect was greater on a per-episode basis than on a per-patient basis.

a Director, Health Services Research, American Specialty Health, San Diego, Calif

b Chief Health Services Officer, American Specialty Health, San Diego, Calif

c Vice President for Clinical Care Management and Clinical Quality Management, American Specialty Health, San Diego, Calif

Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Craig F. Nelson, DC, American Specialty Health, 777 Front St, San Diego, CA 92101

 Sources of support: Funding provided by the American Specialty Health.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00240-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.08.010


View previous. 7 of 21 View next.