Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 8 , Pages 564-569, October 2005

Effects of a Managed Chiropractic Benefit on the Use of Specific Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures in the Treatment of Low Back and Neck Pain

  • Craig F. Nelson, DC, MS

      Affiliations

    • Director, Health Services Research, American Specialty Health, San Diego, Calif
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Craig F. Nelson, DC, American Specialty Health, 777 Front St, San Diego, CA 92101
  • ,
  • R. Douglas Metz, DC

      Affiliations

    • Chief Health Services Officer, American Specialty Health, San Diego, Calif
  • ,
  • Thomas LaBrot, DC

      Affiliations

    • Vice President for Clinical Care Management and Clinical Quality Management, American Specialty Health, San Diego, Calif

Received 7 December 2004

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of this study was to measure the effects of a managed chiropractic benefit on the rates of specific diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for the treatment of back pain and neck pain.

Design

This study is a retrospective analysis of claims data from a managed-care health plan over a 4-year period. The use rates of advanced imaging, surgery, inpatient care, and plain-film radiographs were compared between employer groups with and without a chiropractic benefit.

Results

For patients with low back pain, the use rates of all 4 studied procedures were lower in the group with chiropractic coverage. On a per-episode basis, the rates in the group with coverage were reduced by the following: surgery (−32.1%); computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (−37.2%); plain-film radiography (−23.1%); and inpatient care (−40.1%). On a per-patient basis, the rates were reduced by the following: surgery (−13.7%); CT/MRI (−20.3%); plain-film radiography (−2.2%); and inpatient care (−24.8%). For patients with neck pain, the use rates were reduced per episode in the group with chiropractic coverage as follows: surgery (−49.4%); CT/MRI (−45.6%); plain-film radiography (−36.0%); and inpatient care (−49.5%). Per patient, the rates were surgery (−31.1%); CT/MRI (−25.7%); plain-film radiography (−12.5%); and inpatient care (31.1%). All group differences were statistically significant.

Conclusion

For the treatment of low back and neck pain, the inclusion of a chiropractic benefit resulted in a reduction in the rates of surgery, advanced imaging, inpatient care, and plain-film radiographs. This effect was greater on a per-episode basis than on a per-patient basis.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sources of support: Funding provided by the American Specialty Health.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00240-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.08.010

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 8 , Pages 564-569, October 2005