Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 8 , Pages 604-609 , October 2005

Validation of the Spin-T Goniometer, a Cervical Range of Motion Device

  • Shabnam Agarwal, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Chief Physiotherapist, Belle Vue Clinic, Kolkata, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Shabnam Agarwal, MSc, Belle Vue Clinic, 9, Dr. U.N. Brahnachari St., Kolkata 700 017, India.
  • ,
  • Garry T. Allison, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • The Centre of Musculoskeletal Studies, Perth, Western Australia
  • ,
  • Kevin P. Singer, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • The Centre of Musculoskeletal Studies, Perth, Western Australia

Received 19 May 2004 ,Revised 7 October 2004

References 

  1. White AA, Panjabi MM. In: Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1990;p. 86–122
  2. O'Driscoll SL, Tomenson J. The cervical spine. J Clin Rheum Dis. 1982;8:617–628
  3. Wolfenberger VA, Bui Q, Batenchuk GB. A comparison of methods of evaluating cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:154–160
  4. Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, Bogard CL, Hallman HO, Carey JR. Reliability of measurement of cervical spine range of motion—comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1992;72:770–780
  5. Cassidy JD, Quon JA, LaFrance LJ, Yong-Hing K. The effect of manipulation on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:495–500
  6. Jordan A, Mehlsen J, Ostergaard K. A comparison of physical characteristics between patients seeking treatment for neck pain and age-matched healthy people. J. Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:468–475
  7. Bulgheroni MV, Antonaci F, Ghirmai S, Sandrini G, Nappi G, Pedotti A. A 3D kinematic method for evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans. Funct Neurol. 1998;13:239–245
  8. Christensen HW, Nilsson N. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:383–387
  9. Petersen CM, Johnson RD, Schuit D. Reliability of cervical range of motion using the OSI CA 6000 spine motion analyser on asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects. Man Ther. 2000;5:82–88
  10. Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurement of cervical spine range of motion: comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;71:78–106
  11. Hole DE, Cook JM, Bolton JE. Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender. Man Ther. 2000;1:36–42
  12. Haynes MJ, Edmondston S. Accuracy and reliability of a new protractor based neck goniometer. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:579–586
  13. Tousignant M, de Bellefeuille L, O'Donoughue S, Grahovac S. Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine. 2000;25:324–330
  14. Herrmann DB. Validity study of head and neck flexion-extension motion comparing measurements of a pendulum goniometer and roentgenograms. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;11:414–418
  15. Natalis M, Konig A. Noninvasive, accurate and reliable measurement of cervical spine motion with a 3D real-time ultrasound motion analyzer. Ultraschall Med. 1999;20:70–73
  16. Dvir Z, Prushansky T. Reproducibility and instrument validity of a new ultrasonography based system for measuring cervical spine kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000;5:658–664
  17. Christensen HW. Precision and accuracy of an electrogoniometer. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:10–14
  18. Jordan K, Dziedzic K, Jones PW, Ong BN, Dawes PT. The reliability of the three dimensional FASTRAK measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:382–388

 Sources of support: No external funds were received for this research.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00244-7

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.08.015

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 28, Issue 8 , Pages 604-609 , October 2005