« Previous
Next »
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 1
, Pages
51.e1-51.e7
, January 2006
Pilot Study of Patient Response to Multiple Impulse Therapy for Musculoskeletal Complaints
-
Comparison of multiple impulse therapy performed with the PulStarFRAS with physical therapy12 and osteopathic manipulation.14 The data from van den Hoogen12 were simply replotted. The data from MacDon
-
Comparison of rates of recovery of patients with low back pain (LBP) treated with physical therapy, no treatment, and multiple impulse therapy performed with the PulStarFRAS. (Upper and lower bounds)Comparison of rates of recovery of patients with low back pain (LBP) treated with physical therapy, no treatment, and multiple impulse therapy performed with the PulStarFRAS. (Upper and lower bounds) Physical therapy and no treatment from van den Hoogen et al.12
-
Rate of response of untreated low back pain of differing condition compared to low back pain treated with multiple impulse therapy performed with the PulStarFRAS. Acute, subacute, and chronic untreateRate of response of untreated low back pain of differing condition compared to low back pain treated with multiple impulse therapy performed with the PulStarFRAS. Acute, subacute, and chronic untreated data from van den Hoogen et al.12
Sources of support: Sense Technology provided internal funding for this project.
Presented at the World Federation of Chiropractic 7th Biennial Congress, Orlando Florida, May 1-3, 2003.
PII: S0161-4754(05)00349-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.11.007
© 2006 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 1
, Pages
51.e1-51.e7
, January 2006
