Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 163-173, February 2006

Trunk-Strengthening Exercises for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

  • Susan C. Slade, M Manip Ther, PT

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Susan Slade, P.O. Box 1241, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia 3128.
  • ,
  • Jennifer L. Keating, PhD, PT

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Head of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Received 30 March 2005

Abstract 

Objective

The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effect of lumbar spine-strengthening exercises on outcomes for people with chronic low back pain.

Methods

Two independent reviewers followed Cochrane Back Review Group and QUORUM Statement guidelines to complete this systematic review. Exercise effects were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Thirteen high-quality randomized controlled trials were included. For chronic low back pain, trunk strengthening is more effective than no exercise on long-term pain (SMD 0.95 [0.35-1.55]; intensive trunk strengthening is more effective than less intensive on function (pooled SMD: short-term, 0.58 [0.22-0.94]; long-term, 0.77 [0.33-1.20]). Compared with physiotherapy or aerobics, effects are comparable on pain and function. Motivation strategies increase effectiveness. After disk surgery, effects are significant for function (pooled SMD: short-term, 1.08 (0.76-1.41); long-term, 0.53 (0.03-1.04). For severe degeneration, trunk strengthening is less favorable than fusion on long-term pain (SMD, −0.50 [−0.99 to −0.01]) or function (SMD, −0.76 [−1.25 to −0.26]). Intensive trunk strengthening is less effective than McKenzie exercises for pain reduction (SMD: short-term, −0.29 [−0.54 to −0.05]; long-term, −0.31 [−0.55 to −0.06]). We estimated that moderate effect sizes (0.5) indicate that approximately 50% of participants and large effect sizes (0.8) indicate that approximately 80% of participants would achieve important improvement.

Conclusions

Trunk strengthening appears effective compared with no exercise. Increasing exercise intensity and adding motivation increase treatment effects. Trunk strengthening, compared with aerobics or McKenzie exercises, showed no clear benefit of strengthening. It is unclear whether observed benefits are due to tissue loading or movement repetition.

Key Indexing Terms: Low Back Pain, Exercise Therapy, Review, Systematic, Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sources of support: No funds were received in support of this work.

PII: S0161-4754(05)00376-3

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.011

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 163-173, February 2006