Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 305-314, May 2006

Electromyogram and Force Patterns in Variably Timed Manual Muscle Testing of the Middle Deltoid Muscle

  • Katharine Conable, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice; and Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, Mo
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Katharine M. Conable, DC, Logan College of Chiropractic, 1851 Schoettler Rd, PO Box 1065, Chesterfield, MO 63006-1065.
  • ,
  • John Corneal, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice
  • ,
  • Terry Hambrick, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice
  • ,
  • Nelson Marquina, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Engineering Consultant, Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, Mo
  • ,
  • John Zhang, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, Mo

Received 26 August 2005

Objective

The objective of the study was to compare force curves and surface electromyogram from examiners and subjects during manual muscle testing with 3 examiner-identified variants of manual muscle testing (MMT)—examiner-started (ESMMT), patient-started (PSMMT), and undifferentiated/near-simultaneous (NSMMT).

Methods

Forty-two volunteer applied kinesiologist doctors tested 36 volunteer students, doctors, and spouses at a professional conference. Start-time difference between examiner and subject muscle contraction, peak force, time of peak force and duration of force was measured. Force and surface electromyogram from examiner and subject were recorded simultaneously during MMT of the middle deltoid muscle for each style of testing used in practice.

Results

The congruence between examiner label and timing was as follows: ESMMT, 39%; PSMMT 61%; and NSMMT 28% within 50 milliseconds of simultaneous. Mean subject/examiner start-time difference differed significantly between PSMMT (−0.116 seconds) and both ESMMT (−0.018 seconds) and NSMMT (−0.0053 seconds). No clear cutoff between styles was evident. Peak force ranged from 0.548 to 23.615 lb (mean, 8.806 lb; SD, 4.543 lb), and all styles were significantly different. Duration of force ranged from 0.325 to 3.490 seconds (mean, 1.338 seconds; SD, 0.576 seconds), with NSMMT significantly shorter than ESMMT or PSMMT. The shape of force curves did not differ between styles of muscle testing, but differed between facilitated vs inhibited tests.

Conclusions

In this group of doctors, neither start-time difference nor the shape of force curves distinguished styles of MMT. Differences in peak force and test duration may account for differences in outcomes when examiners purposely vary their muscle testing style.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(06)00046-7

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.002

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics September 2006 (Vol. 29, Issue 7, Page 596)

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 305-314, May 2006