Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 336-338, May 2006

An Etiologic Model to Help Explain the Pathogenesis of Cervical Artery Dissection: Implications for Cervical Manipulation

  • Sidney M. Rubinstein, DC, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO-Institute), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Sidney Rubinstein, DC, MSc, Research fellow, Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO), VU University Medical Centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Scott Haldeman, DC, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Calif; and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif
  • ,
  • Maurits W. van Tulder, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO-Institute), VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and Institute for Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 18 December 2005

We present a theoretical etiologic model of cervical artery dissection for the purpose of coalescing our present understanding of its pathogenesis. Although the notion of an underlying arteriopathy and a trigger are universally accepted concepts, we propose in our model that dissection is a product of an underlying (genetic) predisposition, triggered specifically by risk factors associated with environmental exposure, with or without trivial trauma. Given the widespread daily occurence of neck movements and sporting activities, it seems unlikely that trivial trauma, in the absence of other triggers and an underlying arteriopathy, is sufficient to cause dissection. This concept has significant implications for practitioners of spinal manipulation. This may represent a paradigm shift because the model suggests that stroke following manipulation is unlikely in otherwise healthy individuals. Although this model is consistent with current published case-control studies on cervical artery dissection, further research is necessary to accept or refute it as a tenable hypothesis.

 

PII: S0161-4754(06)00047-9

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.003

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 336-338, May 2006