Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 279-287, May 2006

A Nonsurgical Approach to the Management of Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

  • Donald R. Murphy, DC

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Community Health, Brown University Medical School, Providence RI; Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Research, New York Chiropractic College, Seneca Falls, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Donald R. Murphy, DC, Rhode Island Spine Center, 600 Pawtucket Ave, Pawtucket, RI 02860.
  • ,
  • Eric L. Hurwitz, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hawaii
  • ,
  • Amy Gregory, DC

      Affiliations

    • Rhode Island Spine Center, Pawtucket, RI
  • ,
  • Ronald Clary, DC

      Affiliations

    • Rhode Island Spine Center, Pawtucket, RI

Received 15 July 2005; received in revised form 15 November 2005

Abstract 

Objective

The objective of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes of patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR) treated nonsurgically after a diagnosis-based decision rule.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort study on consecutive patients with CR was performed. Data on 35 consecutive patients were collected at baseline, at the end of the active treatment, and at a minimum of 3 months after cessation of treatment. Disability was measured using the Bournemouth Disability Questionnaire. Pain intensity was measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Patients were also asked to self-rate their improvement.

Results

Complete outcome data were available for 31 of the 35 patients. Twenty-seven patients were reached for long-term follow-up. The mean number of months from last treatment to follow-up was 8.2 months. Seventeen patients (49%) reported their improvement as “excellent” and another 14 (40%) did so as “good.” The mean patient-rated improvement was 88.2%. The mean percentage of improvement in the Bournemouth Disability Questionnaire score was 78%. The mean percentage of improvement in the Numerical Pain Rating Scale score was 72%. Twenty-four of 31 (77.4%) patients had a clinically significant improvement from baseline to the end of treatment, and 25 of 27 (92.6%) had a clinically significant improvement from baseline to long-term follow-up.

Conclusions

The management strategy that we studied yielded favorable outcomes in this patient sample and appears to be a safe option for patients with CR. However, the absence of randomization and a control group limits interpretation with regard to clinical effectiveness. Randomized clinical trials are necessary to distinguish treatment effects from the natural history of CR.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(06)00049-2

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.005

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 279-287, May 2006