Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 257-266 , May 2006

The Effect of Chiropractic Adjustments on Movement Time: A Pilot Study Using Fitts Law

  • Dean L. Smith, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Essence of Wellness Chiropractic Center, Eaton, Ohio; Visiting Faculty, Department of Physical Education, Health and Sports Studies, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Dean L. Smith, DC, PhD, Essence of Wellness Chiropractic Center, 890 South Barron St., Eaton, OH 45320.
    • ,
  • Marvin J. Dainoff, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio
    • ,
  • Jane P. Smith, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice of Chiropractic, Essence of Wellness Chiropractic Center, Eaton, Ohio

Received 10 May 2005 ,Revised 27 June 2005

References 

  1. Reeves NP, Cholewicki J, Milner TE. Muscle reflex classification of low-back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2005;15:53–60
  2. Davis KG, Seol H. Injury-induced kinematic compensations within the lower back: impact of non-lower back injuries. Ergonomics. 2005;48:135–149
  3. Burnett AF, Cornelius MW, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan PB. Spinal kinematics and trunk muscle activity in cyclists: a comparison between healthy controls and non-specific chronic low back pain subjects—a pilot investigation. Man Ther. 2004;9:211–219
  4. Ferguson SA, Marras WS, Burr DL, Davis KG, Gupta P. Differences in motor recruitment and resulting kinematics between low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants during lifting exertions. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:992–999
  5. Moseley GL, Nicholas MK, Hodges PW. Does anticipation of back pain predispose to back trouble?. Brain. 2004;127:2339–2347
  6. Lehman GJ. Biomechanical assessments of lumbar spinal function. How low back pain sufferers differ from normals. Implications for outcome measures research. Part I: kinematic assessments of lumbar function. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:57–62
  7. van Dieen JH, Selen LPJ, Cholewicki J. Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13:333–351
  8. Hawk C, Long CR, Reiter R, Davis SD, CJ A, Evans R. Issues in planning a placebo-controlled trial of manual methods: results of a pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2002;8:21–32
  9. Shambaugh P. Changes in electrical activity in muscles resulting from chiropractic adjustment: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987;10:300–304
  10. Smith DL, Cox RH. Muscular strength and chiropractic: theoretical mechanisms and health implications. J Vertebral Sublux Res. 1999-2000;3:1–13
  11. Kelly DD, Murphy BA, Backhouse DP. Use of a mental rotation reaction time paradigm to measure the effects of upper cervical adjustments on cortical processing: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:246–251
  12. Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation. Spine J. 2002;2:357–371
  13. Dishman JD, Ball KA, Burke J. Central motor excitability changes after spinal manipulation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;25:1–9
  14. Dishman JD, Bulbulian R. Comparison of effects of spinal manipulation and massage on motoneuron excitability. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;41:97–106
  15. Lehman GJ, McGill SM. The influence of a chiropractic manipulation on lumbar kinematics and electromyography during simple and complex tasks: a case study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:576–581
  16. Lehman GJ, McGill SM. Spinal manipulation causes variable spine kinematic and trunk muscle electromyographic responses. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:293–299
  17. Smith DL. Postural dynamics following chiropractic adjustment: preliminary findings. In: Smart LJ, editor. International Society for Ecological Psychology. Oxford (OH): Miami University; p.3.
  18. Murphy BA, Dawson NJ, Slack JR. Sacroiliac joint manipulation decreases the H-reflex. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;35:87–94
  19. Cramer GD, Gregorson DM, Knudsen JT, Hubbard BB, Ustas LM, Cantu JA. The effects of side-posture positioning and adjusting on the lumbar z joints: a randomized controlled trial with sixty-four subjects. Spine. 2002;27:2459–2466
  20. Herzog W. The mechanical, neuromuscular, and physiologic effects produced by spinal manipulation. In:  Herzog W editors. Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000;p. 191–207
  21. Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol. 1954;47:381–391
  22. MacKenzie IS. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum-Comput Interact. 1992;7:91–139
  23. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M. Motor control: theory and applications. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001;
  24. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning a behavioral emphasis. Champaign (Ill): Human Kinetics; 2005;
  25. Soukoreff RW, MacKenzie IS. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. Int J Human-Comput Stud. 2004;61:751–789
  26. Suter E, McMorland G, Herzog W, Bray R. Conservative lower back treatment reduces inhibition in knee extensor muscles: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:76–80
  27. Suter E, McMorland G. Decrease in elbow flexor inhibition after cervical spine manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain. Clin Biomech. 2002;17:541–544
  28. Suter E, McMorland G, Herzog W, Bray R. Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint manipulation in patients with anterior knee pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:149–153
  29. Gatterman MI. Foundations of chiropractic: subluxation. St. Louis (Mo): Mosby; 1995;
  30. Leach RA. The chiropractic theories: a textbook of scientific research. 4th ed.. Baltimore (Md): Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2004;
  31. Peterson DH, Bergmann TF. Chiropractic technique: principles and procedures. 2nd ed.. St. Louis (Mo): Mosby; 2002;
  32. Christensen M, Kollasch MW. Job analysis of chiropractic. Greeley (Colo): National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2005;
  33. Soukereff RW, MacKenzie IS. Generalized Fitts' Law model builder version 1.1. Guelph (Ontario, Canada): the authors. C.. [software on the internet] 1995;[cited 2000 Jun 14]. Available from ftp://snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca/pub/fitts-law/gflmb
  34. Soukoreff RW, MacKenzie IS. Generalized Fitts' Law model builder. In:  Katz IR,  Mack R,  Marks L,  Rosson MB,  Nielsen J editor. Companion proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI'95. New York: ACM; 1995;p. 113–114
  35. Vicente KJ, Torenvliet GL. The earth is spherical (P < .05): alternative methods of statistical inference. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2000;1:248–271
  36. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: a problem based learning approach. 3rd ed.. Champaign (Ill): Human Kinetics; 2004;
  37. Behm DG, Bambury A, Cahill F, Power K. Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1397–1402
  38. Zappia M, Montesanti R, Colao R, Quattrone A. Usefulness of movement time in the assessment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol. 1994;241:543–550
  39. Jankovic J, Ben-Arie L, Schwartz K, Chen K, Khan M, Lai EC, et al. Movement and reaction times and fine coordination tasks following pallidotomy. Mov Disord. 1999;14:57–62
  40. Haas M, Groupp E, Aickin M, Fairweather A, Ganger B, Attwood M, et al. Dose response for chiropractic care of chronic cervicogenic headache and associated neck pain: a randomized pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:547–553
  41. Haas M, Groupp E, Kraemer DF. Dose-response for chiropractic care of chronic low back pain. Spine J. 2004;4:574–583
  42. Descarreaux M, Blouin JS, Drolet M, Papadimitriou S, Teasdale N. Efficacy of preventive spinal manipulation for chronic low-back pain and related disabilities: a preliminary study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:509–514
  43. Santrock JW. Psychology. Updated 7th ed.. Boston: McGraw Hill; 2005;
  44. Smart LJ, Smith DL. Postural dynamics: clinical and empirical implications. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2001;24:340–349
  45. Bonci A, Ratliff R. Strength modulation of the biceps brachii muscles immediately following a single manipulation of the C4/5 intervertebral motor unit in healthy subjects: preliminary report. Am J Chiropr Med. 1990;3:14–18
  46. Rogers RG. The effects of spinal manipulation on cervical kinesthesia in patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:80–85
  47. Enebo B. The effect of cervical spine manipulation on motor control in healthy individuals: a pilot study. Chiropr J Aust. 2003;33:93–97
  48. Wells MR, Gaintinoto S, D'Agate D, Areman BA, Fazzini EA, Dowling D, et al. Standard osteopathic treatment acutely improves gait performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1999;99:92–98
  49. Noll DR, Shores J, Bryman PN, Masterson EV. Adjunctive osteopathic manipulative treatment in the elderly hospitalized with pneumonia: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1999;99:143–152

 D.L. Smith received fellowship support from the Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research (FCER) during this study.

PII: S0161-4754(06)00053-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.009

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 4 , Pages 257-266 , May 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution