Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 363-367 , June 2006

Reproducibility of the Measurement of Active and Passive Cervical Range of Motion

  • Mirrin Hoppenbrouwers, PT

      Affiliations

    • Hogeschool Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Martine M.E.M. Eckhardt

      Affiliations

    • Hogeschool Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Martine MMEM Eckhardt, Rochussenstraat 728, 3015 ZG Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • ,
  • Karin Verkerk, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Hogeschool Rottterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Arianne Verhagen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Epidemiologist and Senior Researcher at the Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 3 June 2005 ,Revised 22 November 2005

References 

  1. Picavet HSJ, Schouten JSAG. Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC3-study. Pain. 2003;102:167–178
  2. van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PMM, Lucas C. Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2005;10:256–269
  3. Bertilson BC, Grunnesjö M, Strender LE. Reliability of clinical tests in the assessment of patients with neck/shoulder problems—impact of history. Spine. 2003;2:2222–2231
  4. Hoving JL, O'Leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R. Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain. 2003;102(3):273–281
  5. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;1:409–415
  6. Winkel D, Aufdemkampe G, Meijer OG. Orthopedische geneeskunde en manuele therapie deel 4c wervelkolom. Eerste druk, Houten/Zavetem: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 1991;
  7. Chen J, Solinger AB, Poncet JF, Lantz CA. Meta analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine. 1999;24:1571–1578
  8. Dvorak J, Antinnes JA, Panjabi M, Loustalot D, Bonomo M. Age and gender related normal motion of cervical spine. Spine. 1992;17:S394–S398
  9. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;37–46
  10. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1985;
  11. Viikari-Juntura E. Interexaminer reliability of observations in physical examinations of the neck. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1526–1532
  12. Pool JJ, Hoving JL, deVet HC, et al. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:84–90

PII: S0161-4754(06)00086-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.04.007

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 363-367 , June 2006