Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 374-377, June 2006

Interexaminer Reliability of the Hip Extension Test for Suspected Impaired Motor Control of the Lumbar Spine

  • Donald R. Murphy, DC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Community Health, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI; and Rhode Island Spine Center, Providence, RI
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Donald R. Murphy, DC, DACAN, Rhode Island Spine Center, 600 Pawtucket Avenue, Pawtucket, RI 02860.
  • ,
  • David Byfield, DC

      Affiliations

    • Welsh Institute of Chiropractic, University of Glamorgan, Wales, UK
  • ,
  • Peter McCarthy, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Welsh Institute of Chiropratic, University of Glamorgan, Wales, UK
  • ,
  • Kim Humphreys, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Amy A. Gregory, DC

      Affiliations

    • Rhode Island Spine Center, Providence, RI
  • ,
  • Ryan Rochon, DC

      Affiliations

    • Rhode Island Spine Center, Providence, RI

Received 15 November 2005; received in revised form 28 November 2005

Abstract 

Objective

The hip extension test may be a clinical sign of impaired motor control in the lumbar spine, which may have a negative impact on spine stability. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interexaminer reliability of the hip extension test for suspected dynamic instability of the lumbar spine in patients with chronic low back pain.

Methods

Forty-two patients with chronic low back pain participated in this interexaminer reliability study. Chronic low back pain was defined as pain of greater than 7 weeks duration in the area between T12 and the buttocks, with or without leg pain. Two doctors of chiropractic simultaneously observed and independently assessed the left and right prone hip extension test on all 42 patients. Results for both examiners were given to an independent recorder. Each examiner was blinded to the results of the other examiner.

Results

The mean age of subjects was 38 years (SD 12.35); 73.8% were female. Sixty-eight percent (SD 1.72) reported current back pain intensity greater than 5 on an 11-point numerical rating scale. The mean score for the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain and Disability questionnaire was 5.8 (SD 4.34). The κ measure of agreement was 0.72 for the left leg and 0.76 for the right leg. This indicated a substantial strength of agreement between examiners for both left and right hip extension tests. For the 8 cases of disagreement, rater 1 generally rated the tests as positive, whereas rater 2 consistently rated the tests as negative.

Conclusions

The hip extension test appears to have good reliability in detecting deviation of the lumbar spine from the midline. Validity with regard to the test's ability to distinguish patients with chronic low back pain from normal individuals and its relation to lumbar spine stability remains to be determined.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(06)00091-1

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.04.012

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 374-377, June 2006