Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 7 , Pages 511-517 , September 2006

Immediate Effects on Neck Pain and Active Range of Motion After a Single Cervical High-Velocity Low-Amplitude Manipulation in Subjects Presenting with Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Raquel Martínez-Segura, PT, DO

      Affiliations

    • Escuela de Osteopatía de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, PT

      Affiliations

    • Escuela de Osteopatía de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: César Fernández de las Peñas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Avenida de Atenas s/n, 28922 Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Mariana Ruiz-Sáez, PT, CO

      Affiliations

    • Escula de Osteopatía de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; and Escula de Osteopatía de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Cristina López-Jiménez, PT, DO

      Affiliations

    • Escula de Osteopatía de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  • ,
  • Cleofás Rodríguez-Blanco, PT, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain

Received 1 December 2005 ,Revised 5 January 2006 ,Accepted 20 April 2006.

References 

  1. Côte P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the Saskatchewan population. Spine. 2000;25:1109–1117
  2. Côte P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. 1998;23:1689–1698
  3. Bogduk N, Aprill C. On the nature of neck pain, discography and cervical zygapophyseal joint blocks. Pain. 1993;54:213–217
  4. Triano JJ. Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy. Spine J. 2001;1:121–130
  5. Gross AR, Kay T, Hondras M, Goldsmith C, Haines T, Peloso P, et al. Manual therapies for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2002;7:131–149
  6. Howing JL, Gross A, Gasner D, Kay T, Kennedy C, Hondras MA, et al. A critical appraisal of review articles on the effectiveness of conservative treatment for neck pain. Spine. 2001;26:196–205
  7. Vernon HT, Aker P, Burns S, Viljakaanen S, Short L. Pressure pain threshold evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990;13:13–16
  8. Cassidy JD, Lopes AA, Yong-Hink K. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:570–575
  9. Nansel D, Peneff A, Cremata E, Carlson J. Time course considerations for the effects of unilateral lower cervical adjustments with respect to the amelioration of cervical lateral-flexion passive end-range asymmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990;13:297–304
  10. Schalkwyk RV, Parkin-Smith GF. A clinical trial investigating the possible effect of the supine cervical rotatory manipulation and the supine lateral break manipulation in the treatment of mechanical neck pain: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:324–331
  11. Nilsson N, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J. Lasting changes in passive range of motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996;19:165–168
  12. Pikula JR. The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on pain reduction and range of motion in patients with acute unilateral neck pain: a pilot study. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 1999;43:111–119
  13. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Downey C, Miangolarra-Page JC. Validity of the lateral gliding test as tool for the diagnosis of inter-vertebral dysfunctions in the lower cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;45:610–616
  14. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for classification of fibromyalgia: report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33:160–170
  15. Mitchell JA. Changes in vertebral artery blood flow following normal rotation of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003;26:347–351
  16. Gibbons P, Tehan P. Manipulation of the spine, thorax and pelvis. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000;
  17. Zachman ZJ, Triana AD, Keating JS, Bolles ST, Braun-Porter L. Inter-examiner reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for the measurement of cervical ranges of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989;12:205–210
  18. Jordan K. Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range of motion measurement tools. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:180–195
  19. Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, Bracke M, Day R, Pastrick M. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:338–340
  20. Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Ertzaard S, Oberg B. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and range of motion of the neck. Phys Can. 2000;52:233–242
  21. Tousignant M, Bellefeuille L, O'Donoughue S, Grahovac S. Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine. 2000;25:324–330
  22. Jensen MP, Turbner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999;83:157–162
  23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988;
  24. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Downey C, Miangolarra-Page JC. Immediate changes in radiographically determined lateral flexion range of motion following a single cervical HVLA manipulation in patients presenting with mechanical neck pain: a case series. Int J Osteopath Med. 2005;8:139–145
  25. Clements B, Gibbons P, McLaughlin P. The amelioration of atlanto-axial rotation asymmetry using high velocity low amplitude manipulation: is the direction of thrust important?. J Osteopath Med. 2001;4:8–14
  26. Buerger AA. Experimental neuromuscular models of spinal manual techniques. Man Med. 1983;1:10–17
  27. Terrett ACJ, Vernon H. Manipulation and pain tolerance: a controlled study of the effects of spinal manipulation on paraspinal cutaneous pain tolerance levels. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;63:217–225
  28. Pickar JG. An in vivo preparation for investigating neural responses to controlled loading of a lumbar vertebra in the anesthetized cat. J Neurosci Methods. 1999;89:87–96
  29. Will T. The biochemical basis of manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1978;1:155–159
  30. Haldeman S. Pain physiology as a neurological model for manipulation. Man Med. 1981;19:5–11
  31. Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation. Spine J. 2002;2:357–371
  32. Cleland JA, Childs JD, McRae M, Palmer JA, Stowell T. Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther. 2005;10:127–135

PII: S0161-4754(06)00175-8

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.022

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 29, Issue 7 , Pages 511-517 , September 2006