Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 116-123 , February 2007

The Reliability of a Posterior-to-Anterior Spinal Stiffness Measuring System in a Population of Patients With Low Back Pain

  • Edward F. Owens Jr., MS, DC

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Research, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Edward F. Owens Jr., MS, DC, Associate Professor of Research, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA 52803.
  • ,
  • James W. DeVocht, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Research, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa
  • ,
  • David G. Wilder, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Iowa Spine Research Center, 1408 SC, Biomedical Engineering Department, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • ,
  • Maruti R. Gudavalli, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor of Research, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa
  • ,
  • William C. Meeker, DC, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Vice President for Research, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa

Received 20 June 2006 ,Revised 7 September 2006 ,Accepted 21 September 2006.

  • Image Result

    A schematic diagram of the PA stiffness system. The Polhemus Liberty electromagnetic tracking system monitors displacement, whereas force is measured with an inline force transducer.

    A schematic diagram of the PA stiffness system. The Polhemus Liberty electromagnetic tracking system monitors displacement, whereas force is measured with an inline force transducer.

  • Image Result

    Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the LBP trial.

    Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the LBP trial.

  • Image Result

    Force vs displacement plots of 5 loading and unloading cycles on the third lumbar SP of a patient in the LBP trial. The nonlinear range is less than 30 N. The more linear 55- to 75-N force range was u

    Force vs displacement plots of 5 loading and unloading cycles on the third lumbar SP of a patient in the LBP trial. The nonlinear range is less than 30 N. The more linear 55- to 75-N force range was used to calculate stiffness.

  • Image Result
    A scatterplot of stiffnesses measured for the 2 successive tests of PA stiffness taken 5 minutes apart. Slp_A is the calculated slope for the first test, averaged from the last 4 cycles of indentation

    A scatterplot of stiffnesses measured for the 2 successive tests of PA stiffness taken 5 minutes apart. Slp_A is the calculated slope for the first test, averaged from the last 4 cycles of indentation. Slp_B is the average slope found for the second test [R2 = 0.628; ICC(3,1), 0.790].

PII: S0161-4754(06)00329-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.006

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 30, Issue 2 , Pages 116-123 , February 2007