Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 30, Issue 3 , Pages 200-205, March 2007

Should Plain Films of the Lumbar Spine be Taken in the Posterior-to-Anterior or Anterior-to-Posterior Position? A Study Using Decision Analysis

  • Kenneth J. Young, DC

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Kenneth J. Young, DC, Young Radiology Consulting, PO Box 9125, Nottingham, NG2 9EG, UK.

Director, Young Radiology Consulting, Nottingham, England

Received 8 September 2006; received in revised form 10 October 2006; accepted 25 November 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

The objective of this study was to mathematically propose the best position for frontally oriented lumbar spine radiographs.

Methods

Decision analysis with a decision tree was used in this study. Factors used in the analysis were radiation dose, ease of implementation, image quality, cost, and patient comfort. Data on these factors were gathered by reviewing the literature.

Results

Radiation dose was found to be the only factor with significant differences between the posterior-to-anterior (PA) position and the anterior-to-posterior (AP) position, and PA films gave lower doses to sensitive organs as compared with AP films. There is also some evidence that PA films show better overall image quality as compared with AP films.

Conclusions

Based on the information used in this study, lumbar spine plain film radiographs should be obtained in the PA position.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(07)00058-9

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.01.013

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 30, Issue 3 , Pages 200-205, March 2007