Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 30, Issue 3 , Pages 215-227, March 2007

Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain in Adults Treated by Manual Therapy: A Systematic Review of Change Scores in Randomized Clinical Trials

  • Howard Vernon, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Howard Vernon, DC, PhD, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie St., Toronto, ON, Canada M2H 3J1.
  • ,
  • Kim Humphreys, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Dean, Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Carol Hagino, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada

Received 20 October 2006; received in revised form 13 November 2006; accepted 25 November 2006.

Abstract 

Objective

This study provides a systematic analysis of group change scores in randomized clinical trials of chronic neck pain not due to whiplash and not including headache or arm pain treated with manual therapy.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of clinical trials of chronic neck pain treated with manual therapies up to December 2005. Only clinical trials scoring above 11.5 (Amsterdam-Maastricht Scale) were included in the analysis.

Results

From 1980 citations, 19 publications were selected. Of the 16 trials analyzed (3 were rejected for poor quality), 9 involved spinal manipulation (12 groups), 5 trials (5 groups) were for spinal mobilization or nonmanipulative manual therapy (1 trial overlapped), and 2 trials (2 groups) involved massage therapy. No trials included trigger point therapy or manual traction of the neck. For manipulation studies, the mean effect size (ES) at 6 weeks for 7 trials (10 groups) was 1.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-2.13); 1.56 (95% CI, 0.73-2.39) at 12 weeks for 4 trials (5 groups); 1.22 (95% CI, 0.38-2.06) from 52 to 104 weeks for 2 trials (2 groups). For mobilization studies, 1 trial reported an ES of 2.5 at 6 weeks, 2 trials reported full recovery in 63.8% to 71.7% of subjects at 7 to 52 weeks, and 1 trial reported greater than 2/10 point pain score reduction in 78.3% of subjects at 4 weeks. For massage studies, 1 reported an ES of 0.03 at 6 weeks, whereas the other reported mean change scores of 7.89/100 and 14.4/100 at 1 and 12 weeks of, respectively.

Conclusions

There is moderate- to high-quality evidence that subjects with chronic neck pain not due to whiplash and without arm pain and headaches show clinically important improvements from a course of spinal manipulation or mobilization at 6, 12, and up to 104 weeks posttreatment. The current evidence does not support a similar level of benefit from massage.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(07)00059-0

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.01.014

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum

    Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics July 2007 (Vol. 30, Issue 6, Pages 473-478)

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 30, Issue 3 , Pages 215-227, March 2007