Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 191-198, March 2008

Comparison of 3 Physical Therapy Modalities For Acute Pain in Lumbar Disc Herniation Measured by Clinical Evaluation and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Zeliha Unlu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Zeliha Unlu, MD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Saliha Tascı, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fellow, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Serdar Tarhan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Yuksel Pabuscu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Serap Islak, MD

      Affiliations

    • Fellow, Department of Radiology, Medical Faculty, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey

Received 12 February 2007; received in revised form 20 August 2007; accepted 11 September 2007.

Abstract 

Objective

This study measures and compares the outcome of traction, ultrasound, and low-power laser (LPL) therapies by using magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters in patients presenting with acute leg pain and low back pain caused by lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Methods

A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned into 1 of 3 groups equally according to the therapies applied, either with traction, ultrasound, or LPL. Treatment consisted of 15 sessions over a period of 3 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were done before and immediately after the treatment. Physical examination of the lumbar spine, severity of pain, functional disability by Roland Disability Questionnaire, and Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and at 1 and 3 months after treatment.

Results

There were significant reductions in pain and disability scores between baseline and follow-up periods, but there was not a significant difference between the 3 treatment groups at any of the 4 interview times. There were significant reductions of size of the herniated mass on magnetic resonance imaging after treatment, but no differences between groups.

Conclusions

This study showed that traction, ultrasound, and LPL therapies were all effective in the treatment of this group of patients with acute LDH. These results suggest that conservative measures such as traction, laser, and ultrasound treatments might have an important role in the treatment of acute LDH.

Key Indexing Terms: Intervertebral Disk, Low Back Pain, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Physical Therapy Modalities, Sciatica

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(08)00024-9

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.02.001

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 31, Issue 3 , Pages 191-198, March 2008