The Impact of Muscular Variation on the Neurodynamic Test for the Median Nerve in a Healthy Population With Langer's Axillary Arch
Received 17 December 2007; received in revised form 22 March 2008; accepted 30 March 2008.
Abstract
Objective
The neurodynamic test of the median nerve (ULNT1) is frequently used to assess the mechanics and physiology of the brachial plexus and median nerve. The present study looks for a positive ULNT1 in a healthy population with Langer's axillary arch (LAA) and analyzes whether LAA affects the elbow extension range of motion (EE-ROM) of the ULNT1.
Method
Of 640 volunteers screened, 26 LAA sides were finally included. Additional history taking revealed “minor symptoms” in some subjects. Minor symptoms do not qualify as a disorder because there is no interference with daily activities and no medical advice is sought. This study investigates whether the ULNT1 can (re)produce minor symptoms or abnormal responses in subjects with LAA. The EE-ROM was compared between the subjects' left and right side, and the subtraction angle—which is the effect of placing the cervical spine in contralateral lateral flexion—was compared between LAA sides and controls.
Results
Langer's axillary arch sides showed a significant increase in the occurrence of minor symptoms and positive ULNT1, but no influence was observed on the EE-ROM.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that LAA may be capable of transiently provoking the axillary neurovascular bundle. The unaffected EE-ROM may be the consequence of a vascular origin of the minor symptoms or the consequence of an ulnar nerve/medial cord response to the ULNT1.
aMaster in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Manual Therapist, Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
bMaster in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Master in Biology, Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (Faculty of Sciences), University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
cCivil Engineer, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
dMaster in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy and Motor Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
eMedical Doctor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
fProfessor in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Doctor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
gProfessor in Anatomy, Medical Doctor, Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
Submit requests for reprints to: Tom Van Hoof, PT, Master in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Manual Therapist, Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 4B3, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
This study was sponsored by a grant of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of Ghent University in support of a Master's thesis in Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy.