Journal Home
Search for

Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 474-483 (July 2008)


View previous. 15 of 16 View next.

The Impact of Muscular Variation on the Neurodynamic Test for the Median Nerve in a Healthy Population With Langer's Axillary Arch

Tom Van Hoof, PTaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Carl Vangestel, PTb, Malcolm Forward, PhD, C. Engc, Bram Verhaeghe, PTd, Lien Van Thilborgh, PTd, Frank Plasschaert, MDe, Martine De Muynck, MD, PhDf, Guy Vanderstraeten, MD, PhDf, Katharina D'Herde, MD, PhDg

Received 17 December 2007; received in revised form 22 March 2008; accepted 30 March 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

The neurodynamic test of the median nerve (ULNT1) is frequently used to assess the mechanics and physiology of the brachial plexus and median nerve. The present study looks for a positive ULNT1 in a healthy population with Langer's axillary arch (LAA) and analyzes whether LAA affects the elbow extension range of motion (EE-ROM) of the ULNT1.

Method

Of 640 volunteers screened, 26 LAA sides were finally included. Additional history taking revealed “minor symptoms” in some subjects. Minor symptoms do not qualify as a disorder because there is no interference with daily activities and no medical advice is sought. This study investigates whether the ULNT1 can (re)produce minor symptoms or abnormal responses in subjects with LAA. The EE-ROM was compared between the subjects' left and right side, and the subtraction angle—which is the effect of placing the cervical spine in contralateral lateral flexion—was compared between LAA sides and controls.

Results

Langer's axillary arch sides showed a significant increase in the occurrence of minor symptoms and positive ULNT1, but no influence was observed on the EE-ROM.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that LAA may be capable of transiently provoking the axillary neurovascular bundle. The unaffected EE-ROM may be the consequence of a vascular origin of the minor symptoms or the consequence of an ulnar nerve/medial cord response to the ULNT1.

a Master in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Manual Therapist, Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

b Master in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Master in Biology, Department of Biology, Terrestrial Ecology Unit (Faculty of Sciences), University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

c Civil Engineer, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

d Master in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy and Motor Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

e Medical Doctor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

f Professor in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Doctor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

g Professor in Anatomy, Medical Doctor, Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Tom Van Hoof, PT, Master in Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Manual Therapist, Department of Human Anatomy, Embryology, Histology and Medical Physics, University of Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 4B3, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

 This study was sponsored by a grant of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of Ghent University in support of a Master's thesis in Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy.

PII: S0161-4754(08)00168-1

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.06.007


View previous. 15 of 16 View next.