Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 465-473 , July 2008

Spinal Palpation for Lumbar Segmental Mobility and Pain Provocation: An Interexaminer Reliability Study

  • Michael Schneider, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private practice of chiropractic, Pittsburgh, Pa
    • PhD candidate, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Michael Schneider, DC, PhD (c.), 1720 Washington Rd, Suite 201, Pittsburgh, PA 15241
    • ,
  • Richard Erhard, PT, DC

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa
    • ,
  • Jennifer Brach, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa
    • ,
  • William Tellin, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private practice of chiropractic, Pittsburgh, Pa
    • ,
  • Frank Imbarlina, DC

      Affiliations

    • Private practice of chiropractic, Pittsburgh, Pa
    • ,
  • Anthony Delitto, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department Chair of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa

Received 20 August 2007 ,Revised 24 March 2008 ,Accepted 30 March 2008.

References 

  1. Binkley J, Stratford PW, Gill C. Interrater reliability of lumbar accessory motion mobility testing. Phys Ther. 1995;75:786–792
  2. Bryde D, Freure BJ, Jones L, Werstine M, Briffa NK. Reliability of palpation of humeral head position in asymptomatic shoulders. Man Ther. 2005;10:191–197
  3. Carmichael JP. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpation for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987;10:164–171
  4. Chesworth BM, MacDermid JC, Roth JH, Patterson SD. Movement diagram and “end-feel” reliability when measuring passive lateral rotation of the shoulder in patients with shoulder pathology. Phys Ther. 1998;78:593–601
  5. Comeaux Z, Eland D, Chila A, Pheley A, Tate M. Measurement challenges in physical diagnosis: refining inter-rater palpation, perception and communication. J Bodywork Mov Ther. 2001;5:245–253
  6. French S, Green S, Forbes A. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:231–238
  7. Herrington LC. The inter-tester reliability of a clinical measurement used to determine the medial/lateral orientation of the patella. Man Ther. 2002;7:163–167
  8. Hicks GE, Fritz J, Delitto A, Mishock J. Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1858–1864
  9. Hubka M, Phelan S. Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994;17:591–595
  10. Jull G, Bogduk N, Marsland A. The accuracy of manual diagnosis for cervical zygapophysial joint pain syndromes. Med J Aust. 1988;148:233–236
  11. Jull G, Zito G, Trott P, Potter H, Shirley D. Inter-examiner reliability to detect painful upper cervical joint dysfunction. Aust J Physiother. 1997;43:125–129
  12. Keating JC, Bergmann TF, Jacobs GE, Finer BA, Larson K. Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990;13:463–470
  13. King W, Lau P, Lees R, Bogduk N. The validity of manual examination in assessing patients with neck pain. Spine J. 2007;7:22–26
  14. Laslett M, Williams M. The reliability of selected pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint pathology. Spine. 1994;19:1243–1249
  15. Lewis J, Green A, Reichard Z. Scapular position: the validity of skin surface palpation. Man Ther. 2002;7:26–30
  16. Maher C, Adams R. Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination. Phys Ther. 1994;74:801–809
  17. Marcotte J, Normand MC, Black P. Measurement of the pressure applied during motion palpation and reliability for cervical spine rotation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:591–596
  18. Mior S, King R, McGregor M, Bernard M. Intra and interexaminer reliability of motion palpation in the cervical spine. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 1985;29:196–198
  19. Nansel D, Peneff A, Jansen R, Cooperstein R. Interexaminer concordance in detecting joint-play asymmetries in the cervical spines of otherwise asymptomatic subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989;12:424–433
  20. O'Haire C, Gibbons P. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Man Ther. 2000;5:13–20
  21. Panzer D. The reliability of lumbar motion palpation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:518–524
  22. Strender LE, Lundin M, Nell K, Strender LE, Lundin M, Nell K. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the neck. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:516–520
  23. Strender LE, Sjoblom A, Sundell K, Ludwig R, Taube A. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of patients with low back pain. Spine. 1997;22:814–820
  24. Seffinger M, Mishra S, Adams A, et al. Spinal palpatory diagnostic procedures utilized by practitioners of spinal manipulation: annotated bibliography of content validity and reliability studies. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2003;47:93–109
  25. Seffinger M, Najm W, Mishra S, et al. Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:E413–E425
  26. van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PM, Lucas C. Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2005;10:256–269
  27. Najm WI, Seffinger MA, Mishra SI, et al. Content validity of manual spinal palpatory exams: a systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2003;3:
  28. Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C. Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:258–275
  29. Huijbregts P. Spinal motion palpation: a review of reliability studies. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002;10:24–39
  30. McGill SM. In: Low back disorders: evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation. Champaign (Ill): Human Kinetics; 2002;p. 230–232
  31. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174
  32. Sim J, Wright CC. The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257–268
  33. Fritz JM, Delitto A, Erhard RE. Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2003;28:1363–1372
  34. Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, McGill SM. Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1753–1762
  35. Childs J, Fritz J, Flynn T, et al. A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:920–928
  36. Laslett M, Aprill CN, McDonald B, Young SB. Diagnosis of sacroiliac joint pain: validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005;10:207–218
  37. Wainner R. Reliability of the clinical examination: how close is ‘‘close enough’’?. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33:488–491
  38. Christensen LB. In: Experimental methodology. Boston (Mass): Allyn & Bacon; 2004;p. 248–249

 This study was approved by the appropriate scientific review committee and Institutional Review Board at the University of Pittsburgh. Institutional Review Board approval number: 0501147.

PII: S0161-4754(08)00176-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.06.004

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 465-473 , July 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution