Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 31, Issue 8 , Pages 577-582 , October 2008

Differences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and Nondominant Sides of Upper and Lower Extremities

  • Luciana Gazzi Macedo, BPT, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Doctural Student, The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Luciana Gazzi Macedo, BPT, MSc, The George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, Level 7, 341 George St, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
  • ,
  • David J. Magee, BPT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    • Associate Dean, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Received 1 August 2007 ,Revised 16 May 2008 ,Accepted 15 June 2008.

References 

  1. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons . Joint motion: method of measuring and recording. Chicago (Ill): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1965;
  2. Gunal I, Kose N, Erdogan O, Gokturk E, Seber S. Normal range of motion of the joints of the upper extremity in male subjects, with special reference to side. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1401–1404
  3. Barnes CJ, Van Steyn SJ, Fischer RA. The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:242–246
  4. Allander E, Bjornsson OJ, Olafsson O, Sigfusson N, Thorsteinsson J. Normal range of joint movements in shoulder, hip, wrist and thumb with special reference to side: a comparison between two populations. Int J Epidemiol. 1974;3:253–259
  5. Stefanyshyn DJ, Engsberg JR. Right to left differences in the ankle joint complex range of motion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26:551–555
  6. Roaas A, Andersson GB. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:205–208
  7. Boone DC, Azen SP. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:756–759
  8. Murray MP, Gore DR, Gardner GM, Mollinger LA. Shoulder motion and muscle strength of normal men and women in two age groups. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;192:268–273
  9. Ellenbecker TS. Shoulder internal and external rotation strength and range of motion of highly skilled junior tennis players. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 1992;2:65–72
  10. Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Subtalar and ankle joint measurements. Phys Ther. 1988;68:672–677
  11. Riddle DL, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Shoulder measurements. Phys Ther. 1987;67:668–673
  12. Rothstein JM, Miller PJ, Roettger RF. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Elbow and knee measurements. Phys Ther. 1983;63:1611–1615
  13. Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 1987;67:1867–1872
  14. Jonhagen S, Nemeth G, Eriksson E. Hamstring injuries in sprinters: the role of concentric and eccentric hamstring muscle strength and flexibility. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:262–266
  15. Marnach ML, Ramin KD, Ramsey PS, Song SW, Stensland JJ, An KN. Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:331–335
  16. Mutingi G, Ranatunga KW. Temperature-dependent changes in the viscoelasticity of intact resting mammalia (rat) fast- and slow-twitch muscle fibers. J Physiol. 1998;508:253–265
  17. Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of a joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 3rd ed.. Philadelphia: FA Davis Co; 2003;
  18. Nigg BM, Nigg CR, Reinschmidt C. Reliability and validity of active, passive and dynamic range of motion tests. Sportverletz Sportschaden. 1995;9:51–57
  19. Doege TC, Houston TP. Guide to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 4th ed.. Chicago: American Medical Association; 1995;

PII: S0161-4754(08)00237-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.09.003

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 31, Issue 8 , Pages 577-582 , October 2008