Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 72-83, January 2009

Forces Applied to the Cervical Spine During Posteroanterior Mobilization

  • Suzanne J. Snodgrass, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Newcastle, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Suzanne J. Snodgrass, PhD, Lecturer, Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Newcastle, Box 24, Hunter Building, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
  • ,
  • Darren A. Rivett, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Head, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Australia
  • ,
  • Val J. Robertson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor of Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Australia
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Stojanovski, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Lecturer, School of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Australia

Received 23 April 2008; received in revised form 23 July 2008; accepted 9 September 2008.

Abstract 

Objective

There is little information on manual forces applied during cervical mobilization, a common treatment technique. Potential variability of applied forces between therapists and treatment occasions, and factors associated with different force applications are unknown. The purpose of this study is to establish the baseline mechanical properties of cervical spine mobilization and to determine if the applied forces are affected by the characteristics of therapists and mobilized subjects.

Methods

Physiotherapists (n = 116) applied 4 grades of posteroanterior mobilization to the premarked C2 and C7 spinous (central technique) and articular processes (unilateral technique, one right and one left) of 1 of 35 asymptomatic subjects. Techniques were performed in randomized order, and the first one was repeated after 20 minutes. Load cells attached to the treatment table recorded forces in 3 directions. Before mobilization, subjects' spinal stiffness at the C2 and C7 spinous processes was measured using a custom device. Analyses of variance with Bonferroni post hoc tests determined technique and grade differences, intraclass correlation coefficients the reliability between therapists, and linear regression the factors associated with forces.

Results

Therapists apply distinct manual forces for different techniques and grades (P < .001). Variability between therapists is high, but intratherapist reliability is good (intraclass correlation coefficient [2,1] for different force parameters, 0.84-0.93). Mean peak forces increase from grades I to IV, ranging from 22 to 92 N for resultant forces. Greater vertical and caudad-cephalad forces are applied to C7 than C2 (P < .01), with higher mediolateral forces during unilateral techniques (P < .001). Male sex of the therapist or the mobilized subject is associated with higher forces, and C2 stiffness, thumb pain and postgraduate training with lower (P < .05).

Conclusions

These results quantify cervical mobilization forces, which will inform future research aimed at improving its application and clinical effectiveness.

Key Indexing Terms: Musculoskeletal Manipulations, Cervical Vertebrae, Biomechanics, Spine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(08)00290-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.09.012

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 32, Issue 1 , Pages 72-83, January 2009