Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 193-202, March 2009

Head Repositioning Accuracy and Posturography Related to Cervical Facet Nerve Blockade and Spinal Manipulative Therapy in Healthy Volunteers: A Time Series Study

  • Per J. Palmgren, RC

      Affiliations

    • Senior Lecturer, Research Fellow, Department of Research, Scandinavian College of Chiropractic, S-169 57 Solna, Sweden
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Per J. Palmgren, RC, CertMedEd, Department of Research, Scandinavian College of Chiropractic, Råsundavägen 101, S-169 57 Solna, Sweden.
  • ,
  • Anders Lindeberg, RC

      Affiliations

    • Senior Lecturer, Scandinavian College of Chiropractic, Solna, Sweden
  • ,
  • Sherdil Nath, MD

      Affiliations

    • Private practice, Pain Clinic, Umeå, Sweden
  • ,
  • Hannu Heikkilä, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Senior Lecturer, Research Fellow, Department of Research, Scandinavian College of Chiropractic, S-169 57 Solna, Sweden

Received 11 June 2008; received in revised form 9 December 2008; accepted 5 January 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

The aim of the study was to investigate if changes in head repositioning accuracy (HRA), and standing balance could be evoked by unilateral facet nerve blockade (FNB) or spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).

Methods

This time series research study (n = 6) was chosen because of the viability of the experiment, sample characteristics, and small sample size. Cervical proprioceptive functions were assessed by exploring HRA and static posture by computerized posturography. All participants were subjected to 2 interventions, unilateral FNB using local anesthetic and SMT.

Results

No significant trends were seen in the subjects over the period of the study. All measurements were taken approximately 3 weeks apart. Visually, it was detected that most of subjects appeared to be greatly affected by the FNB, thus, increasing their deviation from the center point of measurement in extension and flexion movements. When comparing the changes with respect to the baseline after SMT, all subjects showed some differences, though there was a great deal of variation between the subjects. These trends were also seen when comparing the changes from baseline measurements to those after FNB.

Conclusions

Data from this time series research design suggest there was no uniform response to unilateral FNB or to SMT. However, differences indicate that there may be important effects of unilateral FNBs for some of the HRA aspects measured. Balance testing using computerized posturography did not show clear differences between baseline assessments and interventions. A future larger clinical study to detect changes in HRA evoked by unilateral FNB or SMT appears feasible.

Key Indexing Terms: Proprioception, Posture, Musculoskeletal Equilibrium, Articular Range of Motion, Spinal Manipulation, Nerve Block, Chiropractic

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(09)00049-9

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.003

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 193-202, March 2009