Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 216-222 , March 2009

Interexaminer Reliability of a Leg Length Analysis Procedure Among Novice and Experienced Practitioners

  • Kelly R. Holt, BSc (Chiro), PGCertHSc

      Affiliations

    • Researcher, Research Department, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Kelly R. Holt, BSc (Chiro), PGCertHSc, Researcher, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, PO Box 113-044, Newmarket, Auckland, New Zealand.
    • ,
  • David G. Russell, BSc (Chiro)

      Affiliations

    • Chiropractic Centre Director, Chiropractic Centre, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand
    • ,
  • Nicholas J. Hoffmann, BHlthSci, B Chiro

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Gold Coast, Australia
    • ,
  • Benjamin I. Bruce, B Chiro

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Auckland, New Zealand
    • ,
  • Paul M. Bushell, B Chiro

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Napier, New Zealand
    • ,
  • Heidi Haavik Taylor, BSc (Chiro), PhD

      Affiliations

    • Director of Research, Research Department, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, Auckland, New Zealand

Received 26 August 2008 ,Revised 5 January 2009 ,Accepted 5 January 2009.

References 

  1. Ebrall P, Nest A, Walker L, Wright D. Palpatory literacy and the subluxation complex: developing a model to represent what we think and feel. Chiropr J Aust. 2006;36:127–136
  2. Hawk C, Phongphua C, Bleecker J, Swank L, Lopez D, Rubley T. Preliminary study of the reliability of assessment procedures for the indications for chiropractic adjustments of the lumbat spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:382–389
  3. Mior S, King R, McGregor M, Bernard M. Intra and interexaminer reliability of motion palpation in the cervical spine. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 1985;29:195–198
  4. Hansen BE, Simonsen T, Leboeuf-Yde C. Motion palpation of the lumbar spine—a problem with the test or the tester?. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:208–212
  5. Fjellner A, Bexander C, Faleij R, Strender LE. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:511–516
  6. Strender LE, Lundin M, Nell K. Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of the neck. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:516–520
  7. Degenhardt BF, Snider KT, Snider EJ, Johnson JC. Interobserver reliability of osteopathic palpatory diagnostic tests of the lumbar spine: improvements from consensus training. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2005;105:465–473
  8. Gemmell H, Miller P. Interexaminer reliability of multidimensional examination regimens used for detecting spinal manipulable lesions: a systematic review. Clin Chiroprac. 2005;8:199–204
  9. Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Yde C. Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:258–275
  10. Haas M. The reliability of reliability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:199–208
  11. Huijbregts P. Spinal motion palpation: a review of reliability studies. J Manual Manipulative Ther. 2002;10:24–39
  12. Pool JJ, Hoving JL, de Vet HC, van Mameren H, Bouter LM. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:84–90
  13. Riddle DL, Freburger JK. Evaluation of the presence of sacroiliac joint region dysfunction using a combination of tests: a multicenter intertester reliability study. Phys Ther. 2002;82:772–781
  14. Seffinger MA, Najm WI, Mishra SI, Adams A, Dickerson VM, Murphy LS, et al. Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:E413–E425
  15. Smedmark V, Wallin M, Arvidsson I. Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine. Man Ther. 2000;5:97–101
  16. Potter L, McCarthy C, Oldham J. Intraexaminer reliability of identifying a dysfunctional segment in the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:203–207
  17. Deboer KF, Harmon R, Tuttle CD, Wallace H. Reliability study of detection of somatic dysfunctions in the cervical spine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1985;8:9–16
  18. Nguyen HT, Resnick DN, Caldwell SG, Elston EW, Bishop BB, Steinhouser JB, et al. Interexaminer reliability of activator methods' relative leg-length evaluation in the prone extended position. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:565–569
  19. Schneider M, Homonai R, Moreland B, Delitto A. Interexaminer reliability of the prone leg length analysis procedure. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30:514–521
  20. Fuhr AW, Osterbauer PJ. Interexaminer reliability of relative leg-length evaluations in the prone, extended position. J Chiropr Tech. 1989;13–18
  21. Mannello DM. Leg length inequality. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:576–590
  22. Knutson GA. Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: a review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part II. The functional or unloaded leg-length asymmetry. Chiropr Osteopat. 2005;13:12
  23. Cooperstein R, Morschhauser E, Lisi A, Nick TG. Validity of compressive leg checking in measuring artificial leg-length inequality. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003;26:557–566
  24. Henderson CN, Cramer GD, Zhang Q, DeVocht JW, Fournier JT. Introducing the external link model for studying spine fixation and misalignment: part 1—need, rationale, and applications. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30:239–245
  25. Owens EF, Pennacchio VS. Operational definitions of vertebral subluxation: a case study. Top Clin Chiropr. 2001;8:40–48
  26. Owens E. Chiropractic subluxation assessment: what the research tells us. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2002;46:215–220
  27. Homack DMJ. Technique review: Derifield-Thompson leg length analysis and adjusting protocol. Chiropr J Aust. 2005;35:16–20
  28. Nadler A, Holder JM, Talsky MA. Torque Release Technique (TRT): a technique model for chiropractic's second century. Can Chiropr. 1998;3:
  29. Fuhr AW, Colloca CJ, Green JR, Keller TS. Activator methods chiropractic technique. 1st ed.. St Louis: Mosby; 1997;
  30. French SD, Green S, Forbes A. Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:231–238
  31. Walker BF, Buchbinder R. Most commonly used methods of detecting spinal subluxation and the preferred term for its description: a survey of chiropractors in Victoria, Australia. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:583–589
  32. Mior SA, McGregor M, Schut B. The role of experience in clinical accuracy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990;13:68–71
  33. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257–268
  34. Haas M. Statistical methodology for reliability studies. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:119–132
  35. van Trijffel E, Anderegg Q, Bossuyt PM, Lucas C. Inter-examiner reliability of passive assessment of intervertebral motion in the cervical and lumbar spine: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2005;10:256–269
  36. Haas M, Panzer D, Peterson D, Raphael R. Short-term responsiveness of manual thoracic end-play assessment to spinal manipulation: a randomized controlled trial of construct validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:582–589

PII: S0161-4754(09)00055-4

doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.009

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 32, Issue 3 , Pages 216-222 , March 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution