Journal Home
Search for

Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 372-378 (June 2009)


View previous. 10 of 14 View next.

Force-Time Profile Characterization of the McTimoney Toggle-Torque-Recoil Technique

Christopher J. Colloca, DCaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Christina Cunliffe, DC, PhDb, Marisa H. Pinnock, DC, MSc(Chiro)c, Young-Kwan Kim, PhDd, Richard N. Hinrichs, PhDe

Received 27 May 2008; received in revised form 8 March 2009; accepted 6 April 2009.

Abstract 

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to characterize the force-time profile of the McTimoney toggle-torque-recoil (MTTR) technique.

Methods

Two licensed chiropractors trained in the McTimoney Method applied MTTR thrusts to a tabletop where a dynamic load cell had been mounted. Each clinician applied 10 thrusts (5 with each hand) to the load cell in a repeated measures design. Peak forces, time durations, and time to peak force were computed from each of the force-time histories. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare the forces, durations, and times to peak force of the MTTR thrusts. A Mann-Whitney U test compared variables between the 2 clinicians, whereas a Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared right- and left-handed thrusts within clinicians.

Results

Considering all MTTR thrusts, the average peak force was 87.22 N (SD = 24.18 N), the average overall thrust duration was 36.38 milliseconds (SD = 9.58 milliseconds), and the average time to peak force was 12.31 milliseconds (S.D. = 4.39 milliseconds). No significant differences in mean peak force, duration, or time to peak force were observed between clinicians. When comparing intraclinician right and left hand thrusts, differences in peak force and duration were observed individually (P < .05).

Conclusion

For the 2 chiropractors tested, MTTR thrusts were relatively lower in peak force and appreciably faster than other commonly used chiropractic techniques. Future work aims to investigate the relationships between the force-time profiles of MTTR thrusts and resultant physiologic and clinical responses.

a Graduate student, Biomechanics Laboratory, Exercise and Sport Research Institute, Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz

b President, McTimoney College of Chiropractic, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

c Private Practice, Chevington Chiropractic Clinic, Surrey, United Kingdom

d Post doctoral assistant, Biomechanics Laboratory, Exercise and Sport Research Institute, Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz

e Director, Biomechanics Laboratory, Exercise and Sport Research Institute, Department of Kinesiology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz

Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Christopher J. Colloca, DC, 101 South Roosevelt Avenue, Chandler, AZ 84226

PII: S0161-4754(09)00112-2

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.04.005


View previous. 10 of 14 View next.