Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 56-61, January 2010

Recruitment Methods and Costs for a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Chiropractic Care for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Single-Site Pilot Study

  • Jerrilyn A. Cambron, DC, MPH, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, Ill
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Jerrilyn A. Cambron, DC, MPH, PhD, Professor, Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, 200 East Roosevelt Rd, Lombard, IL 60148
  • ,
  • Jennifer M. Dexheimer, LMT

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Coordinator, Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, Ill
  • ,
  • Mabel Chang, DC

      Affiliations

    • Research Resident, Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, Ill
  • ,
  • Gregory D. Cramer, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Dean of Research, Department of Research, National University of Health Sciences, Lombard, Ill

Received 30 March 2009; received in revised form 27 June 2009; accepted 14 July 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

The purpose of this article is to describe the methods for recruitment in a clinical trial on chiropractic care for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Methods

This randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study investigated the efficacy of different amounts of total treatment dosage over 6 weeks in 60 volunteer subjects with lumbar spinal stenosis. Subjects were recruited for this study through several media venues, focusing on successful and cost-effective strategies. Included in our efforts were radio advertising, newspaper advertising, direct mail, and various other low-cost initiatives.

Results

Of the 1211 telephone screens, 60 responders (5.0%) were randomized into the study. The most successful recruitment method was radio advertising, generating more than 64% of the calls (776 subjects). Newspaper and magazine advertising generated approximately 9% of all calls (108 subjects), and direct mail generated less than 7% (79 subjects). The total direct cost for recruitment was $40 740 or $679 per randomized patient. The costs per randomization were highest for direct mail ($995 per randomization) and lowest for newspaper/magazine advertising ($558 per randomization).

Conclusions

Success of recruitment methods may vary based on target population and location. Planning of recruitment efforts is essential to the success of any clinical trial.

Key Indexing Terms: Patient Selection, Patient Participation, Chiropractic, Complementary Therapies, Low Back Pain, Spinal Stenosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(09)00298-X

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.11.002

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 56-61, January 2010