Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 29-41, January 2010

Development of a Quality Checklist Using Delphi Methods for Prescriptive Clinical Prediction Rules: The QUADCPR

  • Chad Cook, PT, PhD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Chad Cook, PT, PhD, MBA, Associate Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Department of Surgery, Duke University Health System, 2200 W Main St, Suite A-210, DUMC Box 104002, Durham, NC 27708.
  • ,
  • Jean-Michel Brismée, PT, ScD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Doctor of Science Program in Physical Therapy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Lubbock, TX
  • ,
  • Ricardo Pietrobon, MD, PhD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor and Associate Vice-Chair of Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC
    • Associate Professor, Duke/NUS Singapore
  • ,
  • Philip Sizer Jr., PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Program Director, Doctor of Science Program in Physical Therapy Director, Clinical Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Lubbock, TX
  • ,
  • Eric Hegedus, PT, DPT, MHSc

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Daniel L. Riddle, PT, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor and Assistant Department Chair, Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

Received 15 July 2009; received in revised form 28 July 2009

Abstract 

Objective

Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are clinician decision-making aids designed to improve the accuracy of a variety of decisions made during patient care. To our knowledge, there are no formally developed consensus-based guidelines designed to provide standards for the creation of CPRs.

Methods

The study used a 3-round Delphi method for consensus of a quality checklist initially developed based on recommendations derived from the literature. The 9 Delphi participants were randomly selected from the authors of peer-reviewed publications of prescriptive CPRs.

Results

During the 3 rounds, the Delphi participants modified the originally derived checklist and, based on a consensus standard, agreed upon a final 23-item checklist, which involved 4 constructs: (1) sample and participants, (2) outcome measures, (3) quality of tests and measures, and (4) statistical assumptions.

Conclusions

Use of the checklist has potential for improving the design and reporting of future prescriptive CPRs.

Key Indexing Terms: Practice Guidelines as Topic, Delphi Technique, Mandatory Reporting

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(09)00306-6

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.11.010

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 1 , Pages 29-41, January 2010