« Previous
Next »
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 2
, Pages 117-124
, February 2010
The Relationship of the Audible Pop to Hypoalgesia Associated With High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude Thrust Manipulation: A Secondary Analysis of an Experimental Study in Pain-Free Participants
References
- . Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine J. 2004;4:335–356
- . Spinal manipulation for low back pain. An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Spine. 1996;21:2860–2871
- Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S169–S191
- Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:478–491
- . A biomechanical model for mechanically efficient cavitation production during spinal manipulation: prethrust position and the neutral zone. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:72–82
- . Patient positioning and spinal locking for lumbar spine rotation manipulation. Man Ther. 2001;6:130–138
- A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:920–928
- A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine. 2002;27:2835–2843
- . Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:14–21
- . Enhancement of in vitro interleukin-2 production in normal subjects following a single spinal manipulative treatment. Chiropr Osteopat. 2008;16:5
- . The audible pop from high-velocity thrust manipulation and outcome in individuals with low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:40–45
- . The audible pop is not necessary for successful spinal high-velocity thrust manipulation in individuals with low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1057–1060
- . The audible pop from thoracic spine thrust manipulation and its relation to short-term outcomes in patients with neck pain. J Man Manip Ther. 2007;15:143–154
- . The therapeutic benefit of the audible release associated with spinal manipulative therapy. A critical review of the literature. Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 1998;7:80–85
- . Changes in pressure pain thresholds over C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint after a cervicothoracic junction manipulation in healthy subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:332–337
- . Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on thermal pain sensitivity: an experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:68
- . Immediate hypoalgesic and motor effects after a single cervical spine manipulation in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:675–681
- . Changes in pressure pain sensitivity in latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle after a cervical spine manipulation in pain-free subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30:578–583
- . Central neuronal plasticity, low back pain and spinal manipulative therapy. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:314–326
- . Hypoalgesia post-manipulative therapy: a review of a potential neurophysiological mechanism. Man Ther. 1995;1:11–16
- . Abnormal sensitization and temporal summation of second pain (wind-up) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain. 2001;91:165–175
- . Temporal summation of second pain and its maintenance are useful for characterizing widespread central sensitization of fibromyalgia patients. J Pain. 2007;8:893–901
- . The influence of expectation on spinal manipulation induced hypoalgesia: an experimental study in normal subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:19
- . Fear of pain, not pain catastrophizing, predicts acute pain intensity, but neither factor predicts tolerance or blood pressure reactivity: An experimental investigation in pain-free individuals. Eur J Pain. 2005;8
- . The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples. J Behav Med. 2000;23:351–365
- . The Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III: further reliability and validity with nonclinical samples. J Behav Med. 2002;25:155–173
- . Effects of anxiety sensitivity on anxiety and pain during a cold pressor challenge in patients with panic disorder. Behav Res Ther. 1999;37:313–323
- . Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med. 1997;20:589–605
- . A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain. 2002;96:319–324
- . Testing factorial validity and gender invariance of the pain catastrophizing scale. J Behav Med. 2004;27:361–372
- . Development of the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III. J Behav Med. 1998;21:389–410
- . The Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ): further psychometric examination in a non-clinical sample. Pain. 2005;116:339–346
- Assessment of pain, depression, and anxiety by visual analogue scale in Japanese women with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Caring Sci. 2002;16:137–141
- . The Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale provides a simple and reliable measure of preoperative anxiety. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49:792–798
- . Assessment of preoperative anxiety: comparison of measures in patients awaiting surgery for breast cancer. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:180–183
- . A one-item question with a Likert or visual analog scale adequately measured current anxiety. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:356–360
- . Enhanced temporal summation of second pain and its central modulation in fibromyalgia patients. Pain. 2002;99:49–59
- . Responsiveness of pain scales: a comparison of three pain intensity measures in chiropractic patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:1–7
- . The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:102–106
- . The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure?. Pain Pract. 2003;3:310–316
- . The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27:117–126
- . Cavitation sounds during spinal manipulative treatments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16:523–526
- Central processing of acute muscle pain in chronic low back pain patients: an EEG mapping study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;24:76–83
- . Generalized deep-tissue hyperalgesia in patients with chronic low-back pain. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:415–420
- Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:613–623
- . Long-term potentiation in spinal nociceptive systems–how acute pain may become chronic. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30:959–964
- . Mechanisms of central sensitization, neuroimmunology & injury biomechanics in persistent pain: implications for musculoskeletal disorders. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14:87–93
- . Evidence for abnormal pain processing in fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Med. 2001;2:208–215
- . Reflex responses associated with manipulative treatments on the thoracic spine: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995;18:233–236
- Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:E413–E425
- . Motion palpation: it's time to accept the evidence. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998;21:568–571
- . Does the adjustment cavitate the targeted joint? An investigation into the location of cavitation sounds. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27:e2
- . The effective forces transmitted by high-speed, low-amplitude thoracic manipulation. Spine. 2001;26:2105–2110
- . Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific. Spine. 2004;29:1452–1457
- . Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine. 1998;23:1124–1128
- . Lessons from a trial of acupuncture and massage for low back pain: patient expectations and treatment effects. Spine. 2001;26:1418–1424
The project was supported by grant no. R-21 AT002796-01 from the National Institutes of Health—National Center for Complimentary and Alternative Medicine (SZG, MDB, MER).
JEB received support from the National Institutes of Health T-32 Neural Plasticity Research Training Fellowship (T32HD043730)
PII: S0161-4754(09)00320-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.12.008
© 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 2
, Pages 117-124
, February 2010
