Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 484-492, September 2010

Management of Chronic Spine-Related Conditions: Consensus Recommendations of a Multidisciplinary Panel

  • Ronald J. Farabaugh, DC

      Affiliations

    • Chair, Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters, Lexington, SC
    • Clinic Director, Farabaugh Chiropractic Clinic, Columbus, Ohio
  • ,
  • Mark D. Dehen, DC

      Affiliations

    • Immediate Past Chair, Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters, Lexington, SC
    • Clinic Director, Back to Wellness Clinic, North Mankato, Minn
  • ,
  • Cheryl Hawk, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Chair, Scientific Commission of Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters, Lexington, SC
    • Director of Clinical Research, Logan College of Chiropractic, Chesterfield, Mo
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Cheryl Hawk, DC, PhD, Director of Clinical Research, Logan College of Chiropractic, 1851 Schoettler Rd, Chesterfield, MO 63017 .

Received 2 July 2010; received in revised form 26 July 2010; accepted 28 July 2010. published online 27 August 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

Chronic spine-related conditions are very problematic in terms of treatment and indemnity costs, diagnostic complexity, and appropriate case management. Currently no chiropractic-directed guideline exists related to chiropractic management of the chronic spine pain patient. The purpose of this project was to develop a broad-based multidisciplinary consensus of medical and chiropractic clinical experts representing mainstream medical and chiropractic practice to produce a document designed to provide standardized parameters of care and documentation.

Methods

Background materials were provided to the panelists prior to the consensus process and served as the basis for the 29 seed statements. Delphi rounds were conducted electronically, and the Nominal Group Panel was conducted via conference call. The RAND/UCLA methodology was used to reach consensus, which was considered present if both the median rating was 7 or higher and at least 80% of panelists rated the statement 7 or higher. Consensus was reached through a combination of Delphi rounds and Nominal Group Panel. Of 29 panelists, 5 were non–doctors of chiropractic.

Results

Specific recommendations regarding treatment, frequency and duration, as well as outcome assessment and contraindications for manipulation, were agreed upon by the panel.

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary panel of experienced practitioners was able to reach a high level (80%) of consensus regarding specific aspects of the chiropractic approach to care for complex patients with chronic spine-related conditions, based on both the scientific evidence and their clinical experience.

Key Indexing Terms: Chiropractic, Chronic Spine Pain, Manipulation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0161-4754(10)00186-7

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.07.002

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 33, Issue 7 , Pages 484-492, September 2010