Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 7-17, January 2012

Chiropractic Treatment vs Self-Management in Patients With Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patients Without Acute Coronary Syndrome

  • Mette J. Stochkendahl, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Researcher, Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics and Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Part of Clinical Locomotion Science, Odense, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationSubmit requests for reprints to: Mette J. Stochkendahl, DC, PhD, Researcher, Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Forskerparken 10A, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
  • ,
  • Henrik W. Christensen, DC, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Director, Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Part of Clinical Locomotion Science, Odense, Denmark
  • ,
  • Werner Vach, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
  • ,
  • Poul F. Høilund-Carlsen, MD, DMSci

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • ,
  • Torben Haghfelt, MD, DMSci

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • ,
  • Jan Hartvigsen, DC, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Part of Clinical Locomotion Science, Odense, Denmark

Received 13 August 2010; received in revised form 16 April 2011; accepted 1 May 2011. published online 21 December 2011.

Abstract 

Objective

The musculoskeletal system is a common but often overlooked cause of chest pain. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the relative effectiveness of 2 treatment approaches for acute musculoskeletal chest pain: (1) chiropractic treatment that included spinal manipulation and (2) self-management as an example of minimal intervention.

Methods

In a nonblinded, randomized, controlled trial set at an emergency cardiology department and 4 outpatient chiropractic clinics, 115 consecutive patients with acute chest pain and no clear medical diagnosis at initial presentation were included. After a baseline evaluation, patients with musculoskeletal chest pain were randomized to 4 weeks of chiropractic treatment or self-management, with posttreatment questionnaire follow-up 4 and 12 weeks later. Primary outcome measures were numeric change in pain intensity (11-point box numerical rating scale) and self-perceived change in pain (7-point ordinal scale).

Results

Both groups experienced decreases in pain, self-perceived positive changes, and increases in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey scores. Observed between-group significant differences were in favor of chiropractic treatment at 4 weeks regarding the primary outcome of self-perceived change in chest pain and at 12 weeks with respect to the primary outcome of numeric change in pain intensity.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial assessing chiropractic treatment vs minimal intervention in patients without acute coronary syndrome but with musculoskeletal chest pain. Results suggest that chiropractic treatment might be useful; but further research in relation to patient selection, standardization of interventions, and identification of potentially active ingredients is needed.

Key Indexing Terms: Chiropractic, Manipulation, Spinal, Chest Pain, Randomized Clinical Trial

 

PII: S0161-4754(10)00327-1

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.11.004

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 7-17, January 2012