Preliminary study of the effects of a placebo chiropractic treatment with sham adjustments

References 

1. Beecher HK. The powerful placebo. JAMA. 1995;159:1602–1606
2. Shapiro AK, Shapiro E. Patient-provider relationships and the placebo effect. In:  Matarazzo JD,  Weiss SM,  Herd JA,  Miller NE editor. Behavioral health: a handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention. New York: : Wiley; 1984;p. 71–383
3. Turner JA, Deyo R, Loeser JD, Von Korff M, Fordyce WE. The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research. JAMA. 1994;271:1609–1614
   • MEDLINE
4. Anthony HM. Some methodological problems in the assessment of complementary therapy. Stat Med. 1987;6:761–771
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Joyce CRB. Placebo and complementary medicine. Lancet. 1994;344:1279–1281
   • CrossRef
6. Keating J. Commentary: the placebo issue and clinical research. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987;10:329–331
   • MEDLINE
7. Mootz RD, Phillips RB. Chiropractic belief systems. In:  Mootz RD,  Cherkin DC editor. Chiropractic in the United States: training, practice, and research. Rockville, Md: : AHCPR; 1997;p. 9–16 Pub. No. 98-N002
8. Phillips RB, Mootz RD. Contemporary chiropractic philosophy. In: 2nd ed.  Haldeman S editors. Principles and practice of chiropractic. Norwalk, Conn: : Appleton and Lange; 1992;p. 45–52
9. Hawk C, Long C, Azad A. Chiropractic care for women with chronic pelvic pain: a prospective single-group intervention study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997;20:73–79
   • MEDLINE
10. Hayes MHS, Patterson DG. Experimental development of the graphic rating scale. Psychol Bull. 1921;18:98–99
11. Freyd MJ. The graphic rating scale. J Ed Psychol. 1923;14:83
12. Maxwell C. Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: a psycho-physical classroom experiment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978;6:15–24
    • MEDLINE
13. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of Visual Analogue Scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227–236
    • MEDLINE
14. Clarke PR, Spear FG. Reliability and sensitivity in the self-assessment of well being. Bull Br Psychol Soc. 1964;17:55
15. Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the visual analogue scale. Fam Pract Res J. 1993;13:15–24
    • MEDLINE
16. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Cramer GD, Emde DL. A comparison of outcome measure for use with back pain patients: results of a feasibility study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16:67–73
    • MEDLINE
17. Hawk CK, Dusio ME, Wallace H, Bernard T, Rexroth C. A study of the reliability, validity and responsiveness of a self-administered instrument to measure global well-being. Palmer J Res. 1995;2:15–22
18. Hawk C, Morter MT. The use of measures of general health status in chiropractic patients: a pilot study. Palmer J Res. 1995;2:39–45
19. Osterbauer PJ, Fuhr AW, Hildebrandt RW. Mechanical force, manually assisted short lever chiropractic adjustment. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992;15:309–317
    • MEDLINE
20. Reed RW, Beavers S, Reddy SK, Kern G. Chiropractic management of primary nocturnal enuresis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994;17:596–600
    • MEDLINE
21. Waagen GN, Haldeman S, Cook G, Lopez D, DeBoer KF. Short term trial of chiropractic adjustments for the relief of chronic low back pain. Manual Med. 1986;2:63–67
22. Arkinstall W, Sandler A, Goughnour B. Efficacy of controlled-release codeine in chronic non-malignant pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain. 1995;62:169–178
    • Abstract
    • Full-Text PDF (927 KB)
    • CrossRef