Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 144-148, March 1999

A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain☆1☆2☆3☆4☆5☆6☆7☆8

Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

Received 22 June 1998

Abstract 

Background: Activities and their importance for daily living vary widely between patients. Patient-specific measurement of functional status means that the evaluation is focused on activities that an individual patient selected as main complaints. Objective: To develop and to evaluate a patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. Study Design: A cohort of 150 patients was measured at baseline and 12 weeks later. Methods: The feasibility of the patient-specific approach was evaluated in patients with nonspecific low back pain. We used effect size statistics to evaluate responsiveness in terms of sensitivity to change and specificity to change. Results: The selection procedure for the main complaint was feasible but labor intensive. The patient-specific approach was able to detect changes in complaints that were highly relevant for the patients. The patient-specific approach appeared to be more sensitive to change but less specific to change compared with other instruments. Conclusions: On the basis of this study it would be valuable to apply the patient-specific approach in future studies, also with the aim of further evaluation. In the meantime a number of practical problems of the method need to be resolved. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:144–8)

Keywords:  Low Back Pain, Responsiveness, Patient Preference, Functional Assessment, Activities of Daily Living

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

☆1 J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:144–8

☆2 bDepartment of Physiotherapy, University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

☆3 cDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.

☆4 dInstitute for Rehabilitation Research, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands.

☆5 e“Hogeschool Limburg,” Department of Physiotherapy, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

☆6 fDepartment of General Practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

☆7 Submit reprint requests to: A.J. Beurskens, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

☆8 Supported by the Fund for Investigative Medicine from the Dutch Medical Insurance Board.

PII: S0161-4754(99)70127-2

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 144-148, March 1999