<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org//inpress?rss=yes"><title>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics - Articles in Press</title><description>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics RSS feed: Articles in Press.    
 Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT)  is dedicated to the advancement of chiropractic health care. 
It provides the latest information on current developments in therapeutics, as well as reviews of clinically oriented research and practical 
information for use in clinical settings. The Journal's editorial board includes some of the world's leading clinical low-back and spine 
researchers from medicine, osteopathy, chiropractic, and post-secondary education.  JMPT , the premier biomedical publication 
in the chiropractic profession, publishes peer-reviewed original articles, case reports, journal abstracts, commentary, and new media 
reviews. Readers include chiropractors, osteopaths, physical therapists, physiatrists, radiologists, and sports medicine specialists.  
 
 JMPT  is the  only  chiropractic journal included in Index Medicus. It is also indexed/abstracted in Current Contents/Clinical 
Medicine and Index to Chiropractic Literature. 
 
Special discount of $99 offered to COCA members.   </description><link>http://www.jmptonline.org//inpress?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2011 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0161-4754</prism:issn><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2011 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002600/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002624/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002636/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002648/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002284/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002296/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002600/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Effect of Thumb Joint Mobilization on Pressure Pain Threshold in Elderly Patients with Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002600/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: This study evaluated the effects of Maitland's passive accessory mobilization on local hypoalgesia and strength in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (TCOA).Methods: Twenty-eight patients between 70 and 90 years old with secondary TCOA were randomized into glide mobilization and sham groups. This study was designed as a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Therapy consisted of Maitland's passive accessory mobilization of the dominant hand during 4 sessions over 2 weeks. We measured pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ), the tubercle of the scaphoid bone, and the unciform apophysis of the hamate bone by algometry. The tip and tripod pinch strength was also measured. Grip strength was measured by a grip dynamometer. Measurements were taken before treatment and after 1 week (first follow-up [FU]) and 2 weeks (second FU).Results: All values in sham group remained unchanged along the treatment period. In the treated group, the PPT in the TMJ was 3.85 ± 0.35 kg/cm2, which increased after treatment to 3.99 ± 0.37 and was maintained at the same level during the first FU 3.94 ± 0.39 and second FU 4.74 ± 0.40. In contrast, we found no differences in PPT in the other studied structures after treatment. Similarly, tip, tripod pinch, and grip strength remained without change after treatment.Conclusions: Passive accessory mobilization increased PPT in the TMJ; however, it did not increase motor function in patients with TCOA.</description><dc:title>Effect of Thumb Joint Mobilization on Pressure Pain Threshold in Elderly Patients with Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Jorge H. Villafañe, Guillermo B. Silva, Josue Fernandez-Carnero</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002624/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Geographic Variations in Availability and Use of Chiropractic Under Medicare - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002624/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure geographic variations in the availability and use of chiropractic under Medicare.Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to analyze a large nationally representative sample of Medicare data. Data from a 20% representative sample of all paid Medicare Part B fee-for-service claims for 2007 were merged with files containing beneficiary and provider data. The sample was restricted to adults aged 65 to 99 years. Measures of chiropractic availability and use were described and selectively mapped by state. Geographic variations were quantified. Spearman test was used to evaluate for correlation between chiropractic availability and use.Results: The average number of doctors of chiropractic (DC) by state was 1135; average DC per 1000 beneficiaries was 2.5 (SD, 1.1). The average number of chiropractic users by state was 34 502 (SD, 30 844); average chiropractic users per 1000 beneficiaries was 76 (SD, 41). Chiropractic availability by state varied 6-fold, and chiropractic use varied nearly 30-fold. Availability was strongly correlated with use (Spearman ρ, 0.86; P &lt; .001). Expenditures per DC were highest in the upper Midwest and lowest in the far West; expenditures per user were highest in New England and New York, and lowest in the West.Conclusion: Chiropractic availability and use by older adults under Medicare predominated in rural states in the North Central United States. Expenditures were higher in the East and Midwest and lower in the far West. Chiropractic availability and use by state were highly correlated. Future analyses should use small-area analysis and statistical modeling to identify factors predictive of chiropractic use.</description><dc:title>Geographic Variations in Availability and Use of Chiropractic Under Medicare - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>James M. Whedon, Yunjie Song</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002636/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Comparison of Third-Year Medical and Physical Therapy Students' Knowledge of Anatomy Using The Carpal Bone Test - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002636/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The curricula of all health professionals have an important foundation of human anatomy. A comparison of the anatomy retention between students from different curricula has not been studied. Our aim was to examine the knowledge competency of third-year physical therapy and medical students in carpal bone anatomy.Methods: The testing was conducted on the third-year medical and physical therapy students at Universidad de Granada. Students were given 5 minutes to answer the carpal bone test, a test which requires the identification of the carpal bones in an illustration of the bony skeleton of carpal region. Differences in the distribution of the responses between groups were analyzed using the χ2 test.Results: One hundred thirty-four (n = 134) tests were analyzed (n = 54 [41%] physical therapy students, n = 80 [59%] medical students). Only 39 students correctly identified all of the carpal bones (42.6% physical therapy, 20% medical, P &lt; .001). Physical therapy students correctly identified a greater number (P &lt; .001) of carpal bones (mean ± SD, 5.8 ± 2.2) than medical students (mean ± SD, 3.1 ± 2.9). The capitate was the most frequently identified bone in both physical therapy (96%) and medical (46%) students (P &lt; .001). The hamate bone was the least frequently identified bone by medical students (n = 29, or 36.3%), whereas the trapezoid bone was the least frequently identified bone by physical therapy students (n = 35, or 64.8%).Conclusion: There are few studies investigating anatomical knowledge levels between disciplines. This study found that physical therapy students exhibited better retention of anatomy of the carpal bones than medical students.</description><dc:title>Comparison of Third-Year Medical and Physical Therapy Students' Knowledge of Anatomy Using The Carpal Bone Test - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Marie Carmen Valenza, Eduardo Castro-Martín, Gerad Valenza, Miguel Guirao-Piñeiro, Ana Isabel De-la-Llave-Rincón, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002648/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Cerebral Perfusion in Patients With Chronic Neck and Upper Back Pain: Preliminary Observations - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002648/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between cerebral perfusion levels, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and spinal joint fixations in patients with neck pain.Methods: Forty-five adult patients (29 were female) with chronic neck/upper thoracic pain during exacerbation were studied. The subjects were grouped according to NDI scores: mild, moderate, and severe. The number of painful/blocked segments in the cervical and upper thoracic spine and costovertebral joints, pain intensity using the visual analog scale, and regional cerebral blood flow of the brain using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were obtained. The SPECT was analyzed semiquantitatively. Analysis of variance tests were conducted on total SPECT scores in each of the NDI groups (P &lt; .05). Univariate correlations were obtained between blockage, pain, and SPECT scores, as well as age and duration. A multivariate analysis was then conducted.Results: Group 1 (mild) consisted of 14 patients. Cerebral perfusion measured by SPECT was normal in all 8 brain regions. Group 2 (moderate) consisted of 16 patients. In this group, a decrease in cerebral perfusion was observed (range, 20%-35%), predominantly in the parietal and frontal zones. Group 3 (severe) consisted of 15 patients. In this group, the decrease in cerebral perfusion observed was from 30% to 45%, again predominantly in the parietal and frontal zones. A significant difference was found between NDI groups (“moderate” and “severe” showed significantly greater hypoperfusion than “mild”). Total blockage score correlated with SPECT scores at r = 0.47, P = .001. In a multivariate analysis, NDI scores contributed 39% of the variance of SPECT scores.Conclusion: In this group of patients with neck and/or upper back pain, NDI scores strongly predicted cerebral hypoperfusion. Spinal joint dysfunction may be involved via hyperactivity in the regional sympathetic nervous system.</description><dc:title>Cerebral Perfusion in Patients With Chronic Neck and Upper Back Pain: Preliminary Observations - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Maxim A. Bakhtadze, Howard Vernon, Anatoliy V. Karalkin, Sergey P. Pasha, Igor O. Tomashevskiy, David Soave</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.12.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2012)</dc:source><dc:date>2012-01-18</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002284/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Effect of Lumbosacral Manipulation on Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Excitability on Asymptomatic Participants - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002284/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the effects of a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation to the lumbosacral joint on corticospinal excitability, as measured by motor evoked potentials (MEPs) using transcranial magnetic stimulation, and spinal reflex excitability, as measured by the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex).Methods: In a randomized, controlled, crossover design, 14 asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 23 ± 5.4 years; 10 men; 4 women) were measured for MEPs and H-reflexes immediately before and after a randomly allocated intervention. The interventions consisted of HVLA applied bilaterally to the lumbosacral joint and a control intervention. Participants returned a week later, and the same procedures were performed using the other intervention. Data for H-reflex and MEP amplitudes were normalized to the M-wave maximum amplitude and analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance with repeated measures.Results: A significant interaction of treatment by time was found for MEP (F1,13 = 4.87, P = .04), and post hoc analyses showed that the MEP/M-wave maximum ratio decreased significantly in the HVLA treatment (P = .02; effect size, 0.68). For H-reflex, there was a significant effect of time (F1,13 = 8.186, P = .01) and treatment and time interaction (F1,13 = 9.05, P = .01), with post hoc analyses showing that H-reflexes were significantly reduced after the HVLA manipulation (P = .004; effect size, 0.94). There were no significant changes in MEP latency or silent period duration.Conclusion: An HVLA manipulation applied to the lumbosacral joint produced a significant decrease in corticospinal and spinal reflex excitability, and no significant change occurred after the control intervention. The changes in H-reflexes were larger than those in MEPs, suggesting a greater degree of inhibition at the level of the spinal cord.</description><dc:title>The Effect of Lumbosacral Manipulation on Corticospinal and Spinal Reflex Excitability on Asymptomatic Participants - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Gary Fryer, Alan J. Pearce</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-31</prism:publicationDate></item><item rdf:about="http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002296/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Influence of Patient Attitude Toward Massage on Pressure Pain Sensitivity and Immune System after Application of Myofascial Release in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Study - Corrected Proof</title><link>http://www.jmptonline.org/article/PIIS0161475411002296/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of patient's attitudes toward massage on pressure pain sensitivity and the immune effects of myofascial release in breast cancer survivors (BCS).Methods: Twenty BCS participated. They presented to the laboratory at the same time of the day on 2 occasions separated by 2 weeks. At each session, they received either a myofascial release technique or control (special attention) intervention. Salivary flow rate, cortisol and immunoglobulin A (IgA) concentrations, and α-amylase activity were obtained before and immediately after intervention from saliva samples. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over the cervical spine and temporalis muscle were assessed bilaterally. The attitude toward massage (ATOM) scale was collected before the first session in all BCS.Results: The analysis of covariance revealed a significant intervention × time interaction for salivary flow rate (P = .010), but not α-amylase (P = .111), IgA (P = .655), and cortisol (P = .363) in favor of the experimental group: BCS exhibited an increase of salivary flow rate after myofascial release intervention. When the ATOM scale was included in the analysis, significant influence on IgA (P = .001) was found: BCS with positive attitude had a significant increase in IgA (P &gt; .05). The analysis of covariance did not find a significant intervention × time interaction for PPT over the cervical spine or temporalis muscle, with no effect of ATOM scales for PPT (P &gt; .05).Conclusion: The current study suggests that myofascial release may lead to an immediate increase in salivary flow rate in BCS with cancer-related fatigue. We also found that the effect of myofascial release on immune function was modulated by a positive patient's attitude toward massage.</description><dc:title>The Influence of Patient Attitude Toward Massage on Pressure Pain Sensitivity and Immune System after Application of Myofascial Release in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Study - Corrected Proof</dc:title><dc:creator>Carolina Fernández-Lao, Irene Cantarero-Villanueva, Lourdes Díaz-Rodríguez, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, Carmen Sánchez-Salado, Manuel Arroyo-Morales</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.011</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (2011)</dc:source><dc:date>2011-10-24</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2011-10-24</prism:publicationDate></item></rdf:RDF>
