Mechanisms and effects of spinal high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: Previous theories


      Objectives: When the clinical efficacy of spinal manipulative treatment for spinal pain has been assessed, high-velocity low-amplitude thrust (HVLAT) manipulation and mobilization have been regarded as clinical interventions giving identical and equivalent biologic effects. The objective of this review is to critically discuss previous theories and research of spinal HVLAT manipulation, highlighting reported neurophysiologic effects that seem to be uniquely associated with cavitation of synovial fluid. Data Source: The biomedical literature was searched for research and reviews on spinal manipulation. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were used to help find relevant articles. Study Selection: All articles relevant to the objectives were selected. Data Extraction: All available data were used. Data Synthesis: The main hypotheses for lesions that respond to HVLAT manipulation were critically discussed: (1) release of entrapped synovial folds or plica, (2) relaxation of hypertonic muscle by sudden stretching, (3) disruption of articular or periarticular adhesions, and (4) unbuckling of motion segments that have undergone disproportionate displacements. Results: There appear to be 2 separate modes of action from zygapophyseal HVLAT manipulation. Intra-articular “mechanical” effects of zygapophyseal HVLAT manipulation seem to be absolutely separate from and irrelevant to the occurrence of reported “neurophysiologic” effects. Cavitation should not be an absolute requirement for the mechanical effects to occur but may be a reliable indicator for successful joint gapping. Conclusions: It is hoped that identification of these unique neurophysiologic effects will provide enough theoretical reason for HVLAT manipulation and mobilization to be assessed independently as individual clinical interventions. (J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:251-262)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Curtis P.
        Spinal manipulation: does it work?.
        Occupational Med: State of the Art Reviews. 1988; 3: 31-44
        • Sandoz R.
        The significance of the manipulative crack and of other articular noises.
        Ann Swiss Chiro Assoc. 1969; 4: 47-68
        • Unsworth A
        • Dowson D
        • Wright V.
        A bioengineering study of cavitation in the metacarpophalangeal joint.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1971; 30: 348-358
        • Young FR.
        : Imperial College Press, London1999
        • Koes BW
        • Assendfelft WJJ
        • Van der Heijden GJMJ
        • Bouter LM.
        Spinal manipulation for low back pain: an updated systematic review of randomised clinical trials.
        Spine. 1996; 21: 2860-2873
        • van Tulder MW
        • Koes BW
        • Bouter LM.
        Conservative treatment of acute and chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of the most common interventions.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 2128-2156
        • Zusman M.
        What does manipulation do? The need for basic research.
        in: 2nd ed. Grieve's modern manual therapy. : Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK1994: 651-659
        • Shekelle PG.
        Spinal manipulation.
        Spine. 1994; 19: 858-861
        • Zaccheo D
        • Reale E.
        Contributo allo conoscenza delle articolazioni tra i processi articulari delle vertebre dell'oumo.
        Arch Ital Anat Embriol. 1956; 61: 1-16
        • Giles LGF
        • Taylor JR.
        Human zygapophyseal joint capsule and synovial fold innervation.
        Br J Rheumatol. 1987; 26: 93-98
        • Bogduk N
        • Jull G.
        The theoretical pathology of acute locked back: a basis for manipulative therapy.
        Man Med. 1985; 1: 78-82
        • Mercer S
        • Bogduk N.
        Intra-articular inclusions of the cervical synovial joints.
        Br J Rheumatol. 1993; 32: 705-710
        • Cavanaugh JM
        • Ozaktay AC
        • Yamashita T
        • Avramov A
        • Getchell TV
        • King AI.
        Mechanisms of low back pain: a neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic study.
        Clin Orthop. 1997; 335: 166-180
        • Yamashita T
        • Cavanaugh JM
        • El-Bohy AA
        • Getchell TV
        • King AI.
        Mechanosensitive afferent units in the lumbar facet joint.
        J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1990; 72A: 865-870
        • Yu S
        • Sether L
        • Haughton VM.
        Facet joint menisci of the cervical spine: correlative MRI and cryomicrotomy study.
        Radiology. 1987; 164: 79-82
        • Cramer GD
        • Tuck NR
        • Knudsen JT
        • Fonda SD
        • Schliesser JS
        • Fournier JT
        • et al.
        Effects of side-posture positioning and side-posture adjusting on the lumbar zygapophyseal joints as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging: a before and after study with randomization.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 380-394
        • Merskey R.
        Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage.
        Pain. 1979; 6: 249-252
      1. The back pain revolution. : Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK1998
        • Hall H
        • McIntosh G
        • Wilson L
        • Melles T.
        Spontaneous onset of back pain.
        Clin J Pain. 1998; 14: 129-133
        • AHCPR
        Clinical Practice Guideline Number 14: Acute low back problems in adults. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
        : US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville MD1994
      2. Clinical standards advisory group report on back pain. : HMSO, London1994
        • Herzog W.
        The biomechanics of spinal manipulative treatments.
        J Can Chiro Assoc. 1994; 38: 216-222
        • Herzog W.
        Mechanical and physiological responses to spinal manipulative treatments.
        J Neuromusculoskeletal Sys. 1995; 3: 1-9
        • Herzog W.
        On sounds and reflexes.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996; 19: 216-218
        • Herzog W.
        The mechanical, neuromuscular, and physiologic effects produced by spinal manipulation.
        in: Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation. : Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY2000: 191-207
        • Herzog W
        • Zhang YT
        • Conway PJ
        • Kawchuk GN.
        Cavitation sounds during spinal manipulative treatments.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993; 16: 523-526
        • Herzog W
        • Conway PJ
        • Zhang YT
        • Gál JM
        • Guimaraes ACS.
        Reflex responses associated with manipulative treatments on the thoracic spine: a pilot study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 233-236
        • Herzog W
        • Scheele D
        • Conway PJ.
        Electromyographic responses of back and limb muscles associated with spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1999; 24: 146-153
        • Suter E
        • Herzog W
        • Conway PJ
        • Zhang YT.
        Reflex response associated with manipulative treatment of the thoracic spine.
        J Neuromusculoskeletal Sys. 1994; 2: 124-130
        • Wyke BD.
        The neurology of the cervical spinal joints.
        Physiotherapy. 1979; 65: 72-76
        • Brennan PC
        • Triano JJ
        • McGregor M
        • Kokjohn K
        • Hondras MA
        • Brennan DC.
        Enhanced neutrophil respiratory burst as a biological marker for manipulation forces: duration of the effect and association with substance P and tumour necrosis factor.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 83-89
        • Gainsbury JM.
        High-velocity thrust and pathophysiology of segmental dysfunction.
        in: 2nd ed. Aspects of manipulative therapy. : Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK1985: 87-93
        • Panjabi MM.
        The stabilising system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaption and enhancement.
        J Spinal Disord. 1992; 5: 383-389
        • Panjabi MM.
        The stabilising system of the spine. Part II. Neutral zone and stability hypothesis.
        J Spinal Disord. 1992; 5: 390-397
        • Richardson C
        • Jull G
        • Hodges P
        • Hides J.
        Therapeutic exercise for spinal segmental stabilization in low back pain. Scientific basis and clinical approach.
        : Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK1999
        • Burnstein AH
        • Wright TM.
        Orthopaedic biomechanics.
        in: : Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD1994: 97-129
        • Carlstedt CA
        • Nordin M.
        Biomechanics of tendons and ligaments.
        in: Basic biomechanics of the mucsuloskeletal system. : Lea and Febiger, London1989: 59-74
        • Pitman MI
        • Peterson L.
        Biomechanics of skeletal muscle.
        in: Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. : Lea and Febiger, London1989: 89-111
        • Taylor DC
        • Dalton JD
        • Seaber AV
        • Garrett WE.
        Viscoelastic properties of muscle tendon units: the biomechanical effects of stretching.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 300-309
        • Binkley J.
        Overview of ligament and tendon structure and mechanics: implications for clinical practice.
        Physiother Can. 1989; 41: 24-30
        • Frisen M
        • Mägi M
        • Sonnerup L
        • Viidik A.
        Rheological analysis of soft collagenous tissue. I. Theoretical consideration.
        J Biomech. 1969; 2: 13
        • Frisen M
        • Mägi M
        • Sonnerup L
        • Viidik A.
        Rheological analysis of soft collagenous tissue. II. Experimental evaluations and verifications.
        J Biomech. 1969; 2: 21
        • Viidik A.
        Mechanical properties of parallel-fibred collagenous tissues.
        in: Progress in biomechanics.1979: 75-113
        • Oakes B.
        Tendon-ligament basic science.
        in: Oxford book of sports medicine. : Oxford University Press, New York, NY1994: 493-511
        • Hubley CL
        • Kozey JW
        • Stanish WD.
        Can stretching prevent athletic injuries?.
        J Musculoskeletal Med. 1984; 1: 25-32
        • Hunter G.
        Specific soft tissue mobilization in the management of soft tissue dysfunction.
        Man Ther. 1998; 3: 2-11
        • Herzog W
        • Conway PJ
        • Kawchuk GN
        • Zhang Y
        • Hasler EM.
        Forces exerted during spinal manipulative therapy.
        Spine. 1993; 18: 1206-1212
        • Gomez JE
        • Thurston GB.
        Comparisons of the oscillatory shear viscoelasticity and composition of pathological synovial fluids.
        Biorheology. 1993; 30: 409-427
        • Jensen CE
        • Koefoed J.
        Flow elasticity of hyaluronate solutions.
        J Colloid Sci. 1954; 9: 460-465
        • Palfrey AJ
        • Davies DV.
        Elasticity of synovial fluid.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1970; 29: 339
        • Palfrey AJ
        • Newton M.
        The viscosity of synovial fluid at high shear rates.
        J Anat. 1970; 106: 404
        • Rainer F
        • Ribitsch V.
        Viskoelastische Eigenschaften der intakten Human-Synovia und ihr Bezug zur Biomechanik [Viscoelastic properties of normal human synovia and their relation to biomechanics].
        Zeitschnift für Rheumatol. 1985; 44: 114-119
        • Watson P
        • Kernohan WG
        • Mollan RAB.
        A study of the cracking sounds from the metacarpophalangeal joint.
        Proc Inst Mech Eng (H) J Engineer Med. 1989; 203: 109-118
        • Semlak K
        • Ferguson AB.
        Joint stability maintained by atmospheric pressure. An experimental study.
        Clin Orthop. 1970; 68: 294-300
        • Brodeur R.
        The audible release associated with joint manipulation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 155-164
        • Buerger AA.
        Experimental neuromuscular models of spinal manual techniques.
        Man Med. 1983; 1: 10-17
        • Gillette RG.
        Potential antinociceptive effects of high-level somatic stimulation: chiropractic manipulation therapy may coactivate both tonic and phasic analgesic systems. Some recent neurophysiological evidence.
        Trans Pacific Cons Chiro Res. 1986; 1 (A4(1)-A4(9))
        • Gillette RG.
        A speculative argument for the coactivation of diverse somatic receptor populations by forceful chiropractic adjustments. A review of the neurophysiological literature.
        Man Med. 1987; 3: 1-14
        • Katavich L.
        Differential effects of spinal manipulative therapy on acute and chronic muscle spasm: a proposal for mechanisms and efficacy.
        Man Ther. 1998; 3: 132-139
        • Korr IM.
        Proprioceptors and somatic dysfunction.
        J Am Osteopathic Assoc. 1975; 74: 638-650
        • Wyke BD.
        Receptor systems in lumbosacral tissues in relation to the production of low back pain.
        in: Idiopathic low back pain. : Mosby Co, London1982: 97-107
        • Wyke BD.
        Articular neurology and manipulative therapy.
        in: 2nd ed. Aspects of manipulative therapy. : Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK1985: 72-77
        • Zusman M.
        Spinal manipulative therapy: review of some proposed mechanisms and a new hypothesis.
        Aus J Physiother. 1986; 32: 89-99
        • Indahl A
        • Kaigle AM
        • Reikeras O
        • Holm SH.
        Interaction between the porcine lumbar intervertebral disc, zygapophyseal joints, and paraspinal muscles.
        Spine. 1997; 22: 834-840
        • Avramov AI
        • Cavanaugh JM
        • Ozaktay CA
        • Getchell T
        • King AT.
        The effects of controlled mechanical loading on group II, III, and IV afferent units from the lumbar zygapophyseal joint and surrounding tissue. An in vitro study.
        J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1992; 74: 1464-1471
        • Conway PJW
        • Herzog W
        • Zhang Y
        • Hasler EM
        • Ladly K.
        Forces required to cause cavitation during spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine.
        Clin Biomech. 1993; 8: 210-214
        • Kawchuk GN
        • Herzog W
        • Hasler EM.
        Forces generated during spinal manipulative therapy of the cervical spine: a pilot study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 275-278
        • Lederman E.
        Fundamentals of manual therapy.
        in: : Churchill Livingstone, London1997: 92
        • Guanche C
        • Knatt T
        • Solomonow M
        • Lu Y
        • Baratta R.
        The synergistic action of the capsule and the shoulder muscles.
        Am J Sports Med. 1995; 23: 301-306
        • Phillips D
        • Petrie S
        • Solomonow M
        • Zhou BH
        • Guanche C
        • D'Ambrosia RD.
        Ligamentomuscular protective reflex in the elbow.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 1997; 22: 473-478
        • Solomonow M
        • Baratta R
        • Zhou BH
        • Shoji H
        • Bose W
        • Beck C
        • et al.
        The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability.
        Am J Sports Med. 1987; 15: 207-213
        • Solomonow M
        • D'Ambrosia RD.
        Neural reflex arcs and muscle control of knee stability and motion.
        in: The knee. MO: Mosby, St. Louis1994: 107-120
        • Solomonow M
        • Zhou B-H
        • Harris M
        • Lu Y
        • Baratta RV.
        The ligamento-muscular stabilizing system of the spine.
        Spine. 1998; 23: 2552-2562
        • Wyke BD.
        The neurology of joints.
        Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng. 1967; 41: 25
        • Dishman JD
        • Bulbulian R.
        Spinal reflex attenuation associated with spinal manipulation.
        Spine. 2000; 25: 2519-2525
        • Cook AJ
        • Woolf CJ
        • Wall PD.
        Prolonged C-fibre mediated facilitation of the flexion reflex in the rat is not due to changes in the afferent terminal or motorneurone excitability.
        Neurosci Lett. 1986; 70: 91-96
        • Cohen ML.
        The clinical challenge of secondary hyperalgesia.
        in: Moving in on pain. : Butterworth-Heinemann, Sydney1995: 21-26
        • Cohen ML.
        Arthralgia and myalgia.
        in: Pain: An updated review. : IASP Press, Seattle, WA1996
        • Hubbard DR
        • Berkoff GM.
        Myofascial trigger points show spontaneous needle EMG activity.
        Spine. 1993; 18: 1803-1807
        • Simons DG
        • Hong C-Z
        • Simons LS.
        Prevalence of spontaneous electrical activity at trigger spots and control sites in rabbit muscle.
        J Musculoskeletal Pain. 1995; 3: 35-48
        • Simons DG
        • Mense S.
        Understanding and measurement of muscle tone as related to clinical muscle pain.
        Pain. 1998; 75: 1-17
        • Grice AS.
        Muscle tonus change following manipulation.
        J Can Chiro Assoc. 1974; 74: 29-31
        • Thabe H.
        Electromyography as tool to document diagnostic findings and therapeutic results associated with somatic dysfunctions in the upper cervical spinal joints and sacroiliac joints.
        Man Med. 1986; 2: 53-58
        • Hsieh J
        • Hong CZ.
        Effect of chiropractic manipulation on the pain threshold of myofascial trigger point: a pilot study.
        in: Proceedings of the 1990 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research,, Washington, DC1990: 359-363
        • Vernon HT
        • Aker P
        • Burns S
        • Viljakaanen S
        • Short L.
        Pressure pain threshold evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a pilot study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13: 13-16
        • Vernon HT
        • Aker P
        • Aramenko M
        • Battershill D
        • Alepin A
        • Penner T.
        Evaluation of neck muscle strength with a modified sphygmomanometer dynamometer: reliability and validity.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 34-39
        • Terrett ACJ
        • Vernon HT.
        Manipulation and pain intolerance: a controlled study of the effect of spinal manipulation on paraspinal cutaneous pain tolerance levels.
        Am J Phys Med. 1984; 63: 217-225
        • Vernon HT.
        Qualitative review of studies of manipulation-induced hypoalgesia.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 134-138
      3. Brennan PC, Hondras MA. Priming of neutrophils for enhanced respiratory burst by manipulation of the thoracic spine. In: Wolk S, editor. Proceedings of the 1989 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation, Washington, DC, Arlington, Virginia, March 31-April 1, 1989. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research; p. 160-3.

        • Brennan PC
        • Kokjohn K
        • Kaltinger CJ
        • Lohr GL
        • Glendening C
        • Hondras MA
        • et al.
        Enhanced phagocytic cell respiratory burst induced by spinal manipulation: Potential role of substance P.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991; 14: 399-408
      4. Brennan PC, Graham M, Hondras MA, McGregor M, Triano JJ. Quality control in a randomized clinical trial using cellular chemiluminescence. In: Callahan D, editor. Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation, Chicago, Illinois, May 15-17, 1992. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, Arlington, Virginia; p. 125.

      5. McGregor M, Brennan PC, Triano JJ. Immunological response to manipulation of the lumbar spine. In: Wolk S. editor. Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation, Arlington, Virginia, April 12-13, 1991. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, Arlington, Virginia; p. 153-5.

        • Payan DG.
        Substance P: a neuroendocrine-immune modulator.
        Hosp Pract. 1989; 24: 67-80
        • Payan DG.
        The role of neuropeptides in inflammation.
        in: Inflammation: basic principles and clinical correlations. : Raven Press, New York, NY1992
        • Payan DG.
        Peripheral neuropeptides, inflammation, and nociception.
        in: Nociception and the neuroendocrine-immune connection. : American Academy of Osteopathy, Athens, OH1992: 34-42
        • Szolcsányi J.
        Neurogenic inflammation: re-evaluation of axon reflex theory.
        in: Neurogenic inflammation. : CRC Press, London1996: 33-42
        • de Groat WC.
        Spinal cord processing of visceral and somatic nociceptive input.
        in: Nociception and the neuroendocrine-immune connection. : American Academy of Osteopathy, Athens, OH1992: 47-71
        • Weisenfeld-Hallin Z.
        Neuropeptides and spinal cord reflexes.
        Prog Brain Res. 1995; 104: 271-282
        • Woolf CJ.
        Excitability changes in central neurones following peripheral damage.
        in: Hyperalgesia and allodynia. : Raven Press, New York, NY1992: 221-243
      6. Triano JJ, Brennan PC, McGregor M. A study of threshold response to thoracic manipulation. In: Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation, Arlington, Virginia, April 12-13, 1991. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research. p. 150-2.

        • Brennan PC.
        Review of the systemic effects of spinal manipulation.
        in: Foundations of chiropractic: subluxation. : Mosby, St. Louis, MO1995: 267-278
      7. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Graham M, Skogsbergh D, Brennan PC. Respiratory burst (RB) activity as a function of manipulation site. In: Proceedings of the 1994 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation. Palm Springs, California, June 10-11, 1994. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, p. 117-8.

        • Kokjohn K
        • Johnson J
        • Graham MA
        • Goral J.
        In vitro stress response of PMN to manipulation forces.
        in: Callahan D Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation, Chicago, Illinois, May 15-17, 1992 Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research,, Arlington, Virginia1992: 123-124
        • Badalemente MA
        • Dee R
        • Ghillani R
        • Chien PF
        • Daniels K.
        Mechanical stimulation of dorsal root ganglia induces increased production of substance P: a mechanism for pain following nerve root compromise?.
        Spine. 1987; 12: 552-555
        • Gál JM
        • Herzog W
        • Kawchuk GN
        • Conway PJ
        • Zhang YT.
        Biomechanical studies of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT): Quantifying the movements of vertebral bodies during SMT.
        J Can Chiro Assoc. 1994; 38: 11-24
        • Gál JM
        • Herzog W
        • Kawchuk GN
        • Conway PJ
        • Zhang YT.
        Forces and relative vertebral movements during SMT to unembalmed post-rigor human cadavers: peculiarities associated with joint cavitation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995; 18: 4-9
        • Gál JM
        • Herzog W
        • Kawchuk GN
        • Conway PJ
        • Zhang YT.
        Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997; 20: 30-40
        • Sandoz R.
        Some physical mechanisms and effects of spinal adjustments.
        Ann Swiss Chiro Assoc. 1976; 6: 91-141
      8. Conway PJW, Herzog W, Zhang Y, Hasler EM, Ladly K. Identification of mechanical factors that may cause cavitation during spinal manipulative treatments. In: Wolk S, editor. Proceedings of the 1991 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation, Arlington, Virginia, April 12-13, 1991. Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, p. 281-4.

        • Fisher JC.
        The fracture of liquids.
        J Appl Phys. 1948; 19: 1062-1067
        • Trevena DH.
        Cavitation and tension in liquids.
        : Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK1987
        • Chen YL
        • Israelachvili J.
        New mechanism of cavitation damage.
        Science. 1991; 252: 1157-1160
        • Chen YL
        • Kuhl T
        • Israelachvili J.
        Mechanism of cavitation damage in thin liquid films: collapse damage vs. inception damage.
        Wear. 1992; 153: 31-51
        • Nordheim Y.
        Eine neue Methode den Gelenkknorpel besonders die Kniegelenkmenisken röntgenologisch darzustellen.
        Fortschr Röntgenstr. 1938; 57: 479
        • Roston JB
        • Wheeler-Haines R.
        Cracking in the metacarpo-phalangeal joint.
        J Anat. 1947; 81: 165-173
        • Meal GM
        • Scott RA.
        Analysis of the joint crack by simultaneous recording of sound and tension.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1986; 9: 189-195
        • Mierau D
        • Cassidy JD
        • Bowen V
        • Dupuis P
        • Noftall F.
        Manipulation and mobilization of the third metacarpophalangeal joint.
        Man Med. 1986; 3: 135-140
        • Minami A
        • An KN
        • Cooney III, WP
        • Linscheid RL
        • Chao EYZ.
        Ligament stability of the metacarpophalangeal joint: A biomechanical study.
        J Hand Surg [Am]. 1985; 10A: 255-260
        • Cassidy JD
        • Quon JA
        • LaFrance LJ
        • Yong HK.
        The effect of manipulation on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 495-500
        • Cassidy JD
        • Lopes AA
        • Yong HK.
        The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992; 15: 570-575
        • Hviid H.
        The influence of chiropractic treatment on the rotary mobility of the cervical spine.
        Ann Swiss Chiropractic Assoc. 1971; 5: 31-44
        • Nilsson N
        • Christensen HW
        • Hartvigsen J.
        Lasting changes in passive range of motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996; 19: 165-168
        • Lewit K.
        The muscular and articular factor in movement restriction.
        Man Med. 1985; 1: 83-85
        • Burton AK
        • Tillotson KM
        • Edwards VA
        • Sykes DA.
        Lumbar spinal mobility and low back symptoms in patients treated with manipulation.
        J Spinal Disord. 1990; 3: 262-268
        • Akeson WH
        • Amiel D
        • Woo SLY.
        Immobility effects on synovial joints. The pathomechanics of joint contracture.
        Biorheology. 1980; 17: 95-110
        • Enneking W
        • Horowitz M.
        The intra-articular effects of immobilization of the human knee.
        J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1972; 54A: 973-985
        • Jull GA.
        Clinical observations of upper cervical mobility.
        in: Modern manual therapy of the vertebral column. : Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK1986: 315-321
        • Tillman LJ
        • Cummings GS.
        Biology mechanisms of connective tissue mutability.
        in: Dynamics of human biological tissue. : FA Davis, Philadelphia, PA1993: 1-44
        • Light KE
        • Nuzik S
        • Personius W.
        Low load prolonged stretch versus high load brief stretch in treating knee contractures.
        Phys Ther. 1984; 64: 330-333
        • Hood W.
        On the so-called “bonesetting”: its nature and results.
        Lancet. 1871; 1 (372,441,499,631): 336
        • Lee M
        • Gál JM
        • Herzog W.
        Biomechanics of manual therapy.
        in: Clin Biomech. : Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, PA2000: 209-238
        • Boden SD
        • Davis DO
        • Dina TS
        • Patronas NJ
        • Wiesel SW.
        Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: A prospective investigation.
        J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1990; 72A: 403-408
        • Haldeman S.
        Failure of the pathology model to predict back pain.
        Spine. 1990; 15: 718-724
        • Jensen MC
        • Brant-Zawadzki MN
        • Obuchowski N
        • Modic MT
        • Malkasian D
        • Ross JS.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain.
        N Engl J Med. 1994; 331: 69-73
        • van Tulder MW
        • Assendfelt WJJ
        • Koes BW
        • Bouter LM.
        Spinal radiographic findings and non-specific low back pain.
        Spine. 1996; 22: 427-434
        • Wiesel SW
        • Tsourmas N
        • Feffer HL
        • Citrin CM
        • Patronas N.
        A study of computer-assisted tomography. 1. The Incidence of positive CAT scans in an asymptomatic group of patients.
        Spine. 1984; 9: 549-551
        • Cyriax J.
        9th ed. Textbook of orthopaedic medicine. Vol 2. : Bailliere Tindall, London1974
        • Ombregt L
        • Bisschop P
        • ter Veer HJ
        • Van de Velde T.
        A system of orthopaedic medicine.
        : WB Saunders, London1995
        • Dvorák J.
        Inappropriate indications and contraindications for manual therapy.
        J Man Med. 1991; 6: 85-88
        • Powell FC
        • Hanigan WC
        • Olivero WC.
        A risk/benefit analysis of spinal manipulative therapy for relief of lumbar or cervical pain.
        Neurosurgery. 1993; 33: 73-79
        • Burton AK
        • Tillotson KM
        • Cleary J.
        Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.
        Eur Spine J. 2000; 9: 202-207
        • Mathews JA
        • Yates DAH.
        Reduction of lumbar disc prolapse by manipulation.
        Br Med J. 1969; 3: 692
        • Cassidy JD
        • Thiel HW
        • Kirkaldy-Willis WH.
        Side-posture manipulation for lumbar intervertebral disk herniation.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993; 16: 96-103
        • Chrisman OD
        • Mittnacht A
        • Snook GA.
        A study of the results following rotary manipulation in the lumbar intervertebral disc syndrome.
        J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1964; 46A: 517
        • Jayson MI
        • Sims-Williams H
        • Young S
        • Baddeley H
        • Collins E.
        Mobilization and manipulation for low back pain.
        Spine. 1981; 6: 409-416
        • Nachemson A.
        Lumbar intradiscal pressure.
        Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1960; 43: 1-140
        • Lindh M.
        Biomechanics of the lumbar spine.
        in: Basic biomechanics of the mucsuloskeletal system. : Lea and Febiger, London1989: 183-207
        • Maigne J-Y
        • Guillon F.
        Highlighting of intervertebral movements and variations of intradiskal pressure during lumbar spine manipulation: a feasibility study.
        J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000; 23: 531-535
        • Kramer J.
        Intervertebral disk diseases: Causes, diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis.
        2nd ed. : George Thieme Verlag, New York, NY1990
        • Dittmar O.
        Zür Röntgenologie des Kniegelenks. Verhandlaingen Deutschen Orthopedischen Gesellschaft.
        in: (27 Congr., Mannheim, 1932)1933
      9. Fick R. Zum Streit um den GelenkdruckAnat Hefte (Abt.1)43:1911-397.

        • Fuiks DM
        • Grayson CE.
        Vacuum pneumarthrography and the spontaneous occurrence of gas in the joint spaces.
        J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1950; 32A: 933-938
        • Watson P
        • Mollan RAB.
        Cineradiography of a cracking joint.
        Br J Radiol. 1990; 63: 145-147
        • Cramer GD
        • Skogsbergh D
        • Tuck NR
        • Floyd J
        • Allen S
        • Fonda S
        • et al.
        The effects of spinal manipulative therapy on the L5 intervertebral foramina as evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging.
        in: Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research, Proceedings of the 1996 International Conference on Spinal Manipulation1996: 158-160
        • Bogduk N.
        Clinical anatomy of the lumbar spine and sacrum. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone,, Edinburgh1997: 204 (1997)