Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 30, ISSUE 1, P44-49, January 2007

Download started.

Ok

An Examination of Musculoskeletal Cognitive Competency in Chiropractic Interns

      Abstract

      Objective

      This study investigates the cognitive competency of final-year chiropractic students in musculoskeletal medicine.

      Methods

      The face, content, and criterion validity of the Basic Clinical Examination (BCE) for musculoskeletal medicine were tested for use in chiropractic education. After validity testing, the BCE was administered in a cross-sectional design to all fourth year students (154) attending the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College.

      Results

      Twenty percent (5 questions) of the BCE was deemed not relevant or outside of the scope of practice by criterion experts. One hundred twenty-three (80%) fourth year chiropractic interns participated in the cross-sectional study. Interns achieved a 51.2% passing rate (mean score, 73.2%; 95% confidence interval, 82%-71.8%) for the 25-item BCE, whereas the criterion experts achieved a 100% passing rate. For the modified 20-item BCE, the interns' mean score was 80.8%, whereas the criterion experts' mean score rose to 92.8%.

      Conclusions

      Most final-year chiropractic interns at this college was found to be competent in musculoskeletal medicine as assessed by the Basic Competency Examination. This is in contradiction to previous work with medical students, recent medical graduates, nonorthopedic staff physicians, osteopathic students, and physical therapy students. Chiropractic clinicians with postgraduate training showed considerably better results than chiropractic interns. Problems pertaining to the content validity (relevance and scope of practice for chiropractors) of the BCE need to be addressed.

      Key Indexing Terms

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Clawson DK
        • Jackson DW
        • Ostergaard DJ
        It's past time to reform the musculoskeletal curriculum.
        Acad Med. 2001; 76: 709-710
        • Garry JP
        Musculoskeletal medicine in the USA; education and training of family physicians.
        Qual Prim Care. 2003; 11: 159-162
        • Schmale GA
        More evidence of educational inadequacies in musculoskeletal medicine.
        Clin Orthop. 2005; 437: 251-259
        • Pinney SJ
        • Regan WD
        Educating medical students about musculoskeletal problems.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 1317-1320
        • Weinstein SL
        2000-2010: The bone and joint decade.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 1-3
        • Smith J
        • Laskowksi ER
        • Noll SR
        Development of a musculoskeletal examination skills course for a physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program.
        Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 80: 747-753
        • Walker DJ
        • Kay LJ
        Musculoskeletal examination for medical students: the need to agree what we teach.
        Rheumatol. 2002; 41: 1221-1223
        • Coady D
        • Walker D
        • Kay L
        Regional examination of the musculoskeletal system (REMS): a core set of clinical skills for medical students.
        Rheumatol. 2004; 43: 633-639
        • Matheny JM
        • Brinker MR
        • Blake R
        • Rowane MP
        Confidence of graduating family practice residents in their management of musculoskeletal conditions.
        Am J Orthop. 2000; 29: 945-952
        • Saywell RM
        • O'Hara BS
        • Zollinger TW
        • Woolridge S
        • Burba JL
        • McKeag DB
        Medical students' experience with musculoskeletal diagnosis in a family medical clerkship.
        Med Teach. 2002; 24: 186-192
        • Morrison MCT
        Teaching of musculoskeletal medicine: a survey of general practitioners and deans.
        Med Teach. 1993; 27: 245-249
        • Matheson G
        Musculoskeletal knowledge: how do you stack up?.
        Phys Sportsmed. 2002; 30: 2
        • Bernstein J
        • Alonso DR
        • DiCaprio M
        • et al.
        Curricular reform in musculoskeletal medicine: needs, opportunities, and solutions.
        Clin Orthop. 2003; 415: 302-308
        • DiCaprio MR
        • Covey A
        • Bernstein J
        Curricular requirements for musculoskeletal medicine in American medical schools.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85A: 565-567
        • Association of American Medical Colleges
        Report VII: contemporary issues in medicine: musculoskeletal medicine education. Medical school objectives project.
        Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington (DC)2005
        • Freedman KB
        • Bernstein J
        The adequacy of medical school education in musculoskeletal medicine.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80: 1421-1427
        • Broadhurst N
        • Freedman KB
        • Bernstein J
        Measuring cognitive and clinical competency in orthopaedics.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 683-684
        • Freedman KB
        • Bernstein J
        Educational deficiencies in musculoskeletal medicine.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 604-608
        • Matzkin E
        • Smith EL
        • Freccero D
        • Richardson AB
        Adequacy of education in musculoskeletal medicine.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 310-314
        • Stockard AR
        • Allen TW
        Competence levels in musculoskeletal medicine: comparison of osteopathic and allopathic medical graduates.
        J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006; 106: 350-355
        • Childs JD
        • Whitman JM
        • Sizer PS
        • Pugia ML
        • Flynn TW
        • Delitto A
        A description of physical therapists' knowledge in managing musculoskeletal conditions.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005; 6: 32
        • McCann J
        • Phillips RL
        • Green LA
        • Freyer GE
        Chiropractors are not a usual source of primary care.
        Am Fam Physician. 2004; 69: 2544
        • Eisenberg DM
        • Cohen MH
        • Hrbek A
        • Grayzel J
        • Van Rompay MI
        • Cooper RA
        Credentialing complementary and alternative medical providers.
        Ann Intern Med. 2002; 137: 965-973
        • Eisenberg DM
        • Kessler RC
        • Van Rompay MI
        • Kaptchuk TJ
        • Wilkey SA
        • Appel S
        • Davis RB
        Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey.
        Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135: 344-351
        • Coulter I
        • Adams A
        • Coggan P
        • Wilkes M
        • Gonyea M
        A comparative study of chiropractic and medical education.
        Altern Ther Health Med. 1998; 4: 64-76
        • Saranchuk R
        • Watkins T
        Analysis of the relationship between program design and professional practice in CMCC's undergraduate chiropractic program.
        J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2000; 44: 230-245
        • Simmons ED
        • Guyer RD
        • Graham-Smith A
        • Herzog R
        Contemporary concepts in spine care radiographic assessment for patients with low-back pain.
        Spine. 1995; 20: 1839-1841
        • Coulter ID
        • Hurwitz EL
        • Adams AH
        • Genosvese BJ
        • Hays R
        • Shekelle PG
        Patients using chiropractors in North America, who are they, and why are they in chiropractic care?.
        Spine. 2002; 27: 291-298

      Linked Article

      • Erratum
        Journal of Manipulative & Physiological TherapeuticsVol. 30Issue 3
        • Preview
          In the January 2007 article by Humphreys et al, the abstract needs correction. The first sentence of the abstract's conclusion states that “Most final-year chiropractic interns at this college was found to be competent….” The sentence should read thus: “Most final-year chiropractic interns at this college were found to be competent….” We regret the error.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF